Măroiu Alexandra-Cristina, Jivănescu Anca, Șerban Dan-Andrei, Negru Radu-Marcel, Duma Virgil-Florin, Sinescu Cosmin, Romînu Mihai
Research Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Prosthodontics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 12;16(10):3694. doi: 10.3390/ma16103694.
(1) Background: Aesthetic dentistry has become one of the most dynamic fields in modern dental medicine. Ceramic veneers represent the most appropriate prosthetic restorations for smile enhancement, due to their minimal invasiveness and highly natural appearance. For long-term clinical success, accurate design of both tooth preparation and ceramic veneers is of paramount importance. The aims of this in vitro study were to assess the stress in anterior teeth restored with Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) ceramic veneers and compare the resistance to detachment and the fracture of ceramic veneers prepared using two different designs. (2) Methods: Sixteen lithium disilicate ceramic veneers were designed and milled using the CAD-CAM technology and divided into two groups according to the preparations ( = 8): Group 1, conventional (CO), with linear marginal contour and Group 2, crenelated (CR), the latter with our novel (patented) sinusoidal marginal design. All samples were bonded to anterior natural teeth. The mechanical resistance to detachment and fracture was investigated by applying bending forces on the incisal margin of the veneers in order to determine which type of preparation leads to better adhesion. An analytic method was employed, as well, and the results of the two approaches were compared. (3) Results: The mean values of the maximum force recorded at the veneer detachment were 78.82 ± 16.55 N for the CO group and 90.20 ± 29.81 N for the CR group. The relative increase, equal to 14.43%, demonstrated that the novel CR tooth preparation provided higher adhesive joints. In order to determine the stress distribution within the adhesive layer, a finite element analysis (FEA) was performed. The statistical -test showed that the mean value of the maximum normal stresses is higher for the CR-type preparations. (4) Conclusions: The patented CR veneers represent a practical solution to augment the adhesion and mechanical properties of ceramic veneers. The obtained results demonstrated that CR adhesive joints triggered higher mechanical and adhesive forces, which subsequently led to a higher resistance to detachment and fracture.
(1) 背景:美容牙科已成为现代牙科医学中最具活力的领域之一。陶瓷贴面由于其微创性和高度自然的外观,是改善笑容最合适的修复体。为了获得长期的临床成功,精确设计牙齿预备和陶瓷贴面至关重要。本体外研究的目的是评估使用计算机辅助设计(CAD)和计算机辅助制造(CAM)陶瓷贴面修复的前牙的应力,并比较使用两种不同设计制备的陶瓷贴面的抗脱粘力和抗折性。(2) 方法:使用CAD-CAM技术设计并研磨16个二硅酸锂陶瓷贴面,根据预备方式分为两组(每组n = 8):第1组为传统型(CO),边缘轮廓为直线型;第2组为圆齿型(CR),后者采用我们新颖的(已获专利的)正弦形边缘设计。所有样本均粘结到天然前牙上。通过在贴面切缘施加弯曲力来研究其抗脱粘和抗折的机械性能,以确定哪种预备方式能产生更好的粘结效果。同时采用了一种分析方法,并比较了两种方法的结果。(3) 结果:CO组贴面脱粘时记录的最大力的平均值为78.82 ± 16.55 N,CR组为90.20 ± 29.81 N。相对增加量为14.43%,表明新颖的CR牙齿预备方式提供了更高的粘结强度。为了确定粘结层内的应力分布,进行了有限元分析(FEA)。统计学t检验表明,CR型预备方式的最大法向应力平均值更高。(4) 结论:已获专利的CR贴面是增强陶瓷贴面粘结力和机械性能的一种实用解决方案。所得结果表明,CR粘结接头引发了更高的机械力和粘结力,进而导致更高的抗脱粘和抗折性。