Hossain Ismail, Subarna Jannatul Ferdous, Kabiraj Congriev Kumar, Begum Jahan Ara, Parvin Rokshana, Martins Mathias, Diel Diego G, Chowdhury Emdadul Haque, Islam Mohammad Rafiqul, Nooruzzaman Mohammed
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 May 20;11(5):1005. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11051005.
Newcastle disease (ND) is endemic in Bangladesh. Locally produced or imported live Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccines based on lentogenic virus strains, locally produced live vaccines of the mesogenic Mukteswar strain, as well as imported inactivated vaccines of lentogenic strains, are being used in Bangladesh under different vaccination regimens. Despite these vaccinations, frequent outbreaks of ND are being reported in Bangladesh. Here we compared the efficacy of booster immunization with three different vaccines in chickens that had been primed with two doses of live LaSota vaccine. A total of 30 birds (Group A) were primed with two doses of live LaSota virus (genotype II) vaccine at days 7 and 28, while 20 birds (Group B) remained unvaccinated. At day 60, birds of Group A were divided into three sub-groups, which received booster immunizations with three different vaccines; A1: live LaSota vaccine, A2: inactivated LaSota vaccine, and A3: inactivated genotype XIII.2 vaccine (BD-C161/2010 strain from Bangladesh). Two weeks after booster vaccination (at day 74), all vaccinated birds (A1-A3) and half of the unvaccinated birds (B1) were challenged with a genotype XIII.2 virulent NDV (BD-C161/2010). A moderate antibody response was observed after the primary vaccination, which substantially increased after the booster vaccination in all groups. The mean HI titers induced by the inactivated LaSota vaccine (8.0 log/5.0 log with LaSota/BD-C161/2010 HI antigen) and the inactivated BD-C161/2010 vaccine (6.7 log/6.2 log with LaSota/BD-C161/2010 HI antigen) were significantly higher than those induced by the LaSota live booster vaccine (3.6 log/2.6 log with LaSota/BD-C161/2010 HI antigen). Despite the differences in the antibody titers, all chickens (A1-A3) survived the virulent NDV challenge, while all the unvaccinated challenged birds died. Among the vaccinated groups, however, 50% of the chickens in Group A1 (live LaSota booster immunization) shed virus at 5- and 7-days post challenge (dpc), while 20% and 10% of the chickens in Group A2 (inactivated LaSota booster immunization) shed virus at 3 and 5 dpc, respectively, and only one chicken (10%) in Group A3 shed virus at 5 dpc. In conclusion, the genotype-matched inactivated NDV booster vaccine offers complete clinical protection and a significant reduction in virus shedding.
新城疫(ND)在孟加拉国呈地方流行。基于弱毒株的本地生产或进口的新城疫病毒(NDV)活疫苗、本地生产的中等毒力 Mukteswar 株活疫苗以及进口的弱毒株灭活疫苗,正在孟加拉国按照不同的免疫程序使用。尽管进行了这些疫苗接种,但孟加拉国仍频繁报告新城疫疫情。在此,我们比较了三种不同疫苗对已用两剂活 LaSota 疫苗进行初免的鸡的加强免疫效果。总共 30 只鸡(A 组)在第 7 天和第 28 天用两剂活 LaSota 病毒(基因型 II)疫苗进行初免,而 20 只鸡(B 组)未接种疫苗。在第 60 天,A 组的鸡被分为三个亚组,分别用三种不同疫苗进行加强免疫;A1:活 LaSota 疫苗,A2:灭活 LaSota 疫苗,A3:灭活基因型 XIII.2 疫苗(来自孟加拉国的 BD-C161/2010 株)。加强免疫两周后(第 74 天),所有接种疫苗的鸡(A1 - A3)和一半未接种疫苗的鸡(B1)用基因型 XIII.2 强毒 NDV(BD-C161/2010)进行攻毒。初免后观察到中等程度的抗体反应,在所有组加强免疫后抗体反应大幅增强。灭活 LaSota 疫苗(用 LaSota/BD-C161/2010 HI 抗原时为 8.0 log/5.0 log)和灭活 BD-C161/2010 疫苗(用 LaSota/BD-C161/2010 HI 抗原时为 6.7 log/6.2 log)诱导的平均血凝抑制(HI)效价显著高于 LaSota 活加强疫苗(用 LaSota/BD-C161/2010 HI 抗原时为 3.6 log/2.6 log)。尽管抗体效价存在差异,但所有鸡(A1 - A3)在强毒 NDV 攻毒中存活,而所有未接种疫苗的攻毒鸡死亡。然而,在接种疫苗的组中,A1 组(活 LaSota 加强免疫)50%的鸡在攻毒后第 5 天和第 7 天排毒(dpc),A2 组(灭活 LaSota 加强免疫)分别有 20%和 10%的鸡在攻毒后第 3 天和第 5 天排毒,A3 组只有 1 只鸡(10%)在攻毒后第 5 天排毒。总之,基因型匹配的灭活 NDV 加强疫苗提供了完全的临床保护并显著减少了病毒排出。