Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病行血液透析患者及其家属共享决策体验的研究:范围综述。

The experience of shared decision-making for patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis and their families-A scoping review.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK.

Doctoral College, Ulster University, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):6243-6253. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16766. Epub 2023 May 27.

Abstract

AIM

To identify the experiences of shared decision-making (SDM) for adults with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and their family members.

DESIGN

A scoping literature review.

METHOD

A scoping literature review, using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Medline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych Info, ProQuest, Web of Science, Open grey and grey literature were searched covering years from January 2015 to July 2022. Empirical studies, unpublished thesis and studies in English were included. The scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta analysis-scoping review extension (PRISMA-Scr).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the final review. While SDM is welcomed by people undergoing HD, their experience is often limited to treatment decisions, with little opportunity to revisit decisions previously made. The role of the family/caregivers as active participants in SDM requires recognition.

CONCLUSION

People with end-stage kidney disease undergoing HD do and want to participate in the process of SDM, on a wide range of topics, in addition to treatment. A strategy is needed to ensure that SDM interventions are successful in achieving patient-driven outcomes and enhancing their quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review highlights the experiences of people undergoing HD and their family/caregivers. There is a wide variety of clinical decisions requiring consideration for people undergoing HD, including considering the importance who should be involved in the decision-making processes and when decisions should occur. Further study to ensure nurses understand the importance, and influence of including family members in conversations on both SDM processes and outcomes is needed. There is a need for research from both patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives to ensure that people feel supported and have their needs met in the SDM process.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

目的

确定接受血液透析(HD)治疗的终末期肾病成人及其家属在共同决策(SDM)方面的体验。

设计

范围综述文献。

方法

使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所指南进行范围综述文献。

数据来源

Medline(OVID)、EMBASE、CINAHL、Psych Info、ProQuest、Web of Science、Open Grey 和灰色文献,涵盖了 2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月的年份。纳入的研究包括实证研究、未发表的论文和英文研究。使用首选报告项目的系统综述-扩展范围综述(PRISMA-Scr)进行范围综述。

结果

最终综述纳入了 13 项研究。虽然接受 HD 治疗的人对 SDM 表示欢迎,但他们的体验往往仅限于治疗决策,几乎没有机会重新审议之前做出的决策。需要认识到家庭成员/照顾者作为 SDM 积极参与者的作用。

结论

接受 HD 治疗的终末期肾病患者确实希望参与除治疗以外的广泛主题的 SDM 过程。需要制定一项策略,以确保 SDM 干预措施成功实现以患者为驱动的结果,并提高他们的生活质量。

对临床实践的影响

本综述强调了接受 HD 治疗的患者及其家属的体验。接受 HD 治疗的患者需要考虑各种各样的临床决策,包括考虑谁应该参与决策过程以及何时做出决策。需要进一步研究以确保护士了解包括家庭成员参与 SDM 过程和结果的重要性和影响。需要从患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的角度进行研究,以确保人们在 SDM 过程中感到得到支持并满足他们的需求。

患者和公众贡献

无患者或公众贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验