• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

至少 3.5 年的整体式二硅酸锂混合基台冠的临床性能。

Clinical performance of monolithic lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns over at least 3.5 years.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2024 Jan;33(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13719. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.13719
PMID:37243453
Abstract

PURPOSE

Hybrid abutment crowns (HACs) made from monolithic ceramics represent an efficient option for single restorations on implants. However, long-term data are scarce. The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the survival and complication rates of CAD-CAM fabricated HACs over a time period of at least 3.5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with a total of 40 HACs made of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic bonded to a titanium base CAD-CAM abutment were retrospectively evaluated. All implants and screw-retained restorations were placed and manufactured in the same department of a university hospital. Only crowns that had been in service for more than 3.5 years were included in the study. HACs were evaluated regarding technical and biological complications. Functional Implant Prosthodontic Scores (FIPS) were obtained.

RESULTS

The mean observation time was 5.9 ± 1.4 years. Implant survival was 100%, and HAC survival was 97.5%. Over the observation period, one crown fracture was observed, necessitating refabricating of the restoration. Three minor biological complications were found. The overall mean FIPS score was 8.69 ± 1.12 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, monolithic screw-retained HACs milled from lithium disilicate ceramics and bonded to titanium bases appeared to be a reliable treatment option over more than 3.5 years due to their low biological and technical complication rates.

摘要

目的

由整体陶瓷制成的混合基台冠(HAC)是种植体单颗修复的有效选择。然而,长期数据有限。本临床试验的目的是评估 CAD-CAM 制作的 HAC 在至少 3.5 年的时间内的存活率和并发症发生率。

材料与方法

回顾性评估了 25 名患者的 40 个 HAC,这些 HAC 由整体锂硅玻璃陶瓷制成,结合在 CAD-CAM 钛基底台。所有种植体和螺丝固位修复体均由大学医院的同一科室进行植入和制作。本研究仅纳入使用时间超过 3.5 年的冠。评估 HAC 的技术和生物学并发症。获取功能性种植体修复体评分(FIPS)。

结果

平均观察时间为 5.9 ± 1.4 年。种植体存活率为 100%,HAC 存活率为 97.5%。在观察期间,发现 1 例冠折,需要重新制作修复体。发现 3 例轻微的生物学并发症。总体平均 FIPS 评分为 8.69 ± 1.12 分。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,由锂硅玻璃陶瓷制成并结合钛基底的整体螺丝固位 HAC 显示出是一种可靠的治疗选择,超过 3.5 年的低生物学和技术并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of monolithic lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns over at least 3.5 years.至少 3.5 年的整体式二硅酸锂混合基台冠的临床性能。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Jan;33(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13719. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
2
Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.疲劳后整体式二硅酸锂植入物支持的单冠与钛基基台粘结与定制陶瓷基台粘结的失败负荷。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):136-146. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13369. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.基于钛基底的整体式 CAD/CAM 制作的基台-冠的机械稳定性和技术效果:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Feb;32(2):222-232. doi: 10.1111/clr.13693. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns.整体式混合基台冠(螺丝固位)与带有粘结式整体冠的整体式混合基台的对比
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Mar;34(3):209-220. doi: 10.1111/clr.14031. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
5
Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns: Influence of crown height, crown morphology and material on the implant-abutment complex.整体式混合基台冠:冠高度、冠形态和材料对种植体-基台复合体的影响。
J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Oct 16;68(4):606-614. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00253. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results.CAD/CAM氧化锆基台和二硅酸锂全冠修复体的前瞻性评估:2.4年结果
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jul;116(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.023. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.基于钛的二硅酸锂和氧化锆植入物修复体的抗断裂性能。
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):644-650. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12765. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
8
Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.钛、氧化锆和陶瓷增强聚醚醚酮种植体基台支持 CAD/CAM 整体式氧化锂硅陶瓷冠在老化后的抗折强度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):622–630. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7036. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.两种制作技术和两种设计的定制硅酸锂植入修复体的抗 fracture 性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):677-684. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9657.
10
Strength of implant-supported lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations after thermomechanical aging.热机械老化后,种植体支持的锂硅玻璃陶瓷和聚合物渗透陶瓷网络修复体的强度。
Int J Comput Dent. 2023 Sep 26;26(3):237-245. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3781703.

引用本文的文献

1
How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.CAD-CAM种植体支持的全瓷修复体与钛基在临床上的结合稳定性如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Mar 26;17:181-200. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S510760. eCollection 2025.
2
Monolithic Hybrid Abutment Crowns (Screw-Retained) Versus Monolithic Hybrid Abutments With Monolithic Crowns (Adhesively Cemented): Three-Year Data of a Prospective Clinical Split-Mouth Study.整体式混合基台冠(螺丝固位)与带整体式冠的整体式混合基台(粘结固定):一项前瞻性临床双侧对照研究的三年数据
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):126-141. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13335. Epub 2024 Oct 26.