• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内留置导管超过 10 天的感染风险:随机对照试验的事后分析。

Risk of infections in intravascular catheters in situ for more than 10 days: a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

IAME UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France; Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Center, Geneva, Switzerland.

IAME UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Sep;29(9):1200.e1-1200.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.025
PMID:37245658
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the infectious risk during the dwell time for different catheter types. Furthermore, we wanted to identify risk factors for infections from catheters in place for >10 days.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis using prospectively collected data from four randomized controlled trials. First, we evaluated the infectious risk after 10 days of analysing the significance of the interaction between dwell time and catheter type in a Cox model. Second, we investigated risk factors for infection in catheters in place for >10 days using multivariable marginal Cox models.

RESULTS

We included 15 036 intravascular catheters from 24 intensive care units. Infections occurred in 46 (0.7%) of 6298 arterial catheters (ACs), 62 (1.0%) of 6036 central venous catheters (CVCs) and 47 (1.7%) of 2702 short-term dialysis catheters (DCs). The interaction between dwell time beyond 10 days and catheter type was significant for CVCs (p 0.008) and DCs (p < 0.001), thus indicating an increased risk of infection after 10 days. The interaction was not significant for ACs (p 0.98). Therefore, we selected 1405 CVCs and 454 DCs in place for >10 days for further analyses. In the multivariable marginal Cox model, we observed an increased hazard ratio (HR) for infection for femoral CVC (HR, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.99-20.09), jugular CVC (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.13-7.07), femoral DC (HR, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.54-13.33) and jugular DC (HR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.42-14.21) compared with subclavian insertions.

DISCUSSION

We showed that the risk of catheter infection for CVCs and DCs increased 10 days after insertion, thus suggesting routine replacement for nonsubclavian catheters in situ for >10 days.

摘要

目的

我们旨在描述不同类型导管留置期间的感染风险。此外,我们还希望确定导管留置时间超过 10 天时感染的危险因素。

方法

我们使用四项随机对照试验前瞻性收集的数据进行了事后分析。首先,我们通过 Cox 模型分析留置时间和导管类型之间的交互作用,评估第 10 天后的感染风险。其次,我们使用多变量边际 Cox 模型研究导管留置时间超过 10 天时感染的危险因素。

结果

我们纳入了 24 个重症监护病房的 15036 例血管内导管。6298 例动脉导管(AC)中有 46 例(0.7%)发生感染,6036 例中心静脉导管(CVC)中有 62 例(1.0%)发生感染,2702 例短期透析导管(DC)中有 47 例(1.7%)发生感染。留置时间超过 10 天与导管类型之间的交互作用对于 CVC(p=0.008)和 DC(p<0.001)有统计学意义,这表明超过 10 天后感染风险增加。AC 之间的交互作用无统计学意义(p=0.98)。因此,我们选择了留置时间超过 10 天的 1405 例 CVC 和 454 例 DC 进一步分析。在多变量边际 Cox 模型中,我们观察到股静脉 CVC(HR,6.33;95%CI,1.99-20.09)、颈内静脉 CVC(HR,2.82;95%CI,1.13-7.07)、股静脉 DC(HR,4.53;95%CI,1.54-13.33)和颈内静脉 DC(HR,4.50;95%CI,1.42-14.21)的感染风险比均升高。

讨论

我们发现,CVC 和 DC 的感染风险在导管插入后 10 天增加,因此建议对留置时间超过 10 天的非锁骨下导管常规更换。

相似文献

1
Risk of infections in intravascular catheters in situ for more than 10 days: a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管内留置导管超过 10 天的感染风险:随机对照试验的事后分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Sep;29(9):1200.e1-1200.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Short-term dialysis catheter versus central venous catheter infections in ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of individual data of 4 multi-centric randomized trials.短期透析导管与 ICU 患者中心静脉导管感染:4 项多中心随机试验个体数据的事后分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05812-w. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Ultrasound Guidance and Risk for Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in the Intensive Care Unit: A Post Hoc Analysis of Individual Data of 3 Multicenter Randomized Trials.超声引导与 ICU 中心静脉导管相关感染风险:3 项多中心随机试验的个体数据事后分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1054-e1061. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1817.
4
Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model of central venous catheter-tip colonization in a cohort of five randomized trials.开发和验证了一个多变量预测模型,用于预测五个随机试验队列中心静脉导管尖端定植。
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 7;26(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04078-x.
5
Jugular versus femoral short-term catheterization and risk of infection in intensive care unit patients. Causal analysis of two randomized trials.颈内静脉与股静脉短期置管与 ICU 患者感染风险。两项随机试验的因果分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1232-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0460OC.
6
Complications of intravascular catheters in ICU: definitions, incidence and severity. A randomized controlled trial comparing usual transparent dressings versus new-generation dressings (the ADVANCED study).ICU 中血管内导管相关并发症:定义、发生率和严重程度。一项比较常规透明敷料与新一代敷料的随机对照试验(ADVANCED 研究)。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1753-1765. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4582-2. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Cumulative Evidence of Randomized Controlled and Observational Studies on Catheter-Related Infection Risk of Central Venous Catheter Insertion Site in ICU Patients: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.ICU患者中心静脉导管插入部位导管相关感染风险的随机对照和观察性研究的累积证据:成对和网状荟萃分析
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e437-e448. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002092.
8
Peripherally inserted central catheters versus non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters in newborns: a retrospective observational study.新生儿外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管与非隧道式超声引导中心静脉导管的比较:一项回顾性观察研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):e058866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058866.
9
Obesity and risk of catheter-related infections in the ICU. A post hoc analysis of four large randomized controlled trials.肥胖与 ICU 患者导管相关感染的风险。四项大型随机对照试验的事后分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):435-443. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06336-4. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.股静脉置管与锁骨下静脉和颈内静脉置管相比与导管相关血流感染的风险:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2479-85. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d9bc.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review.重新评估短期中心静脉导管定期更换的必要性:一项叙述性综合综述。
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Nov 7;6(4):100420. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100420. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparison of outcomes from tunnelled femorally inserted central catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: a propensity score-matched cohort study.经隧道股静脉插入中心导管与经外周静脉插入中心导管的结局比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 17;14(5):e081749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081749.
3
Modified combined short and long axis method versus oblique axis method in adult patients undergoing right internal jugular vein cannulation: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study.
改良的短轴联合长轴法与斜轴法在成人右颈内静脉置管中的随机对照非劣效性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 19;18(12):e0295916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295916. eCollection 2023.