NSW Institute for Trauma and Injury Management (ITIM), NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI), Australia; Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Australia.
NSW Institute for Trauma and Injury Management (ITIM), NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI), Australia.
Injury. 2023 Sep;54(9):110846. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110846. Epub 2023 May 24.
Prehospital triage and transport protocols are critical components of the trauma systems. Still, there have been limited studies evaluating the performance of trauma protocols in New South Wales, such as the NSW ambulance major Trauma transport protocol (T1).
Determine the performance of a major trauma transport protocol in a cohort of ambulance road transports METHODS: A data-linkage study using routine ambulance and hospital datasets across New South Wales Australia. Adult patients (age > 16 years) where any trauma protocol was indicated by paramedic crews and transported to any emergency department in the state were included. Major injury outcome was defined as an Injury Severity Score >8 based on coded in-patient diagnoses, or admission to intensive care unit or death within 30 days due to injury. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine ambulance predictors of major injury outcome.
There were 168,452 linked ambulance transports analysed. Of the 9,012 T1 protocol activations, 2,443 cases had major injury [positive predictive value (PPV) = 27.1%]. There were 16,823 major injuries in total giving a sensitivity of the T1 protocol of 2,443/16,823 (14.5%), specificity of 145,060/151,629 (95.7%) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 145,060/159,440 (91%). Overtriage rate associated with T1 protocol was 5,697/9,012 (63.2%) and undertriage rate was 5,509/159,440 (3.5%). The most important predictor of major injury was the activation of more than one trauma protocol by ambulance paramedics.
Overall, the T1 was associated with low undertriage and high specificity. The protocol may be improved by considering age and the number of trauma protocols activated by paramedics for any given patient.
院前分诊和转运方案是创伤系统的重要组成部分。然而,在新南威尔士州,评估创伤方案性能的研究有限,例如新南威尔士州救护车主要创伤转运方案(T1)。
确定在新南威尔士州救护车道路转运的队列中,主要创伤转运方案的性能。
这是一项使用澳大利亚新南威尔士州常规救护车和医院数据集进行的数据链接研究。纳入任何创伤方案均由护理人员指示并转运至该州任何急诊部的成年患者(年龄>16 岁)。主要损伤结局定义为基于编码住院诊断的损伤严重程度评分>8,或入住重症监护病房或因损伤在 30 天内死亡。采用多变量逻辑回归确定救护车对主要损伤结局的预测因素。
共分析了 168452 例链接救护车转运。在 9012 次 T1 方案激活中,有 2443 例发生主要损伤[阳性预测值(PPV)=27.1%]。总共有 16823 例主要损伤,T1 方案的灵敏度为 2443/16823(14.5%),特异性为 145060/151629(95.7%),阴性预测值(NPV)为 145060/159440(91%)。与 T1 方案相关的过度分诊率为 5697/9012(63.2%),分诊不足率为 5509/159440(3.5%)。主要损伤的最重要预测因素是救护车护理人员激活了多个创伤方案。
总体而言,T1 与低分诊不足和高特异性相关。该方案可通过考虑年龄和每个患者激活的创伤方案数量进行改进。