NSW Institute for Trauma and Injury Management (ITIM), NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI), Australia; Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Australia.
NSW Institute for Trauma and Injury Management (ITIM), NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI), Australia.
Injury. 2023 Oct;54(10):110988. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110988. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Prehospital trauma systems are designed to ensure optimal survival from critical injuries by triaging and transporting such patients to the most appropriate hospital in a timely manner.
We sought to evaluate whether prehospital time and location (metropolitan versus non-metropolitan) were associated with 30-day mortality in a cohort of patients transported by road ambulance using a trauma transport protocol.
Data linkage analysis of routinely collected ambulance and hospital data across all public hospitals in New South Wales (NSW). The data linkage cohort included adult patients (age ≥ 16years) transported by NSW Ambulance, where a T1 Major Trauma Transport Protocol was documented by paramedic crews and transported by road to a public hospital emergency department in NSW for two years between January 2019 and December 2020. The outcomes of interest were prehospital times (response time, scene time and transport time) and 30-day mortality due to injury.
9012 cases were identified who were transported to an emergency department with T1 protocol indication. Median prehospital transport times were longer in non-metropolitan road transports [n = 3,071, 98 min (71-126)] compared to metropolitan transports [n = 5,941, 65 min (53-80), p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (1.24% vs 1.65%, p = 0.13). In the subgroup of patients with abnormal vital signs, the only predictors of mortality were increasing age, presence of severe injury (OR 24.87, 95%CI 11.02, 56.15, p < 0.001), and arrival at a non-trauma facility (OR 3.01, 95%CI 1.26, 7.20, p < 0.05). Increasing transport times were not found to increase the odds of 30-day mortality.
In the context of an inclusive trauma system and an established prehospital major trauma protocol, increasing prehospital transport times and scene location were not associated with increased mortality.
院前创伤系统旨在通过分诊和及时将此类患者送往最合适的医院,确保从严重创伤中获得最佳生存机会。
我们旨在评估在使用创伤转运方案通过公路救护车转运的患者队列中,院前时间和地点(城市与非城市)是否与 30 天死亡率相关。
对新南威尔士州(NSW)所有公立医院常规收集的救护车和医院数据进行数据链接分析。该数据链接队列包括成年患者(年龄≥16 岁),由 NSW 救护车转运,其中记录了由护理人员记录的 T1 重大创伤转运方案,并在 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月的两年间通过公路转运到 NSW 公立医院急诊科。研究结果为院前时间(反应时间、现场时间和转运时间)和因伤导致的 30 天死亡率。
确定了 9012 例符合 T1 方案指征的患者被转运到急诊科。非城市公路转运的院前转运时间中位数较长[ n =3071,98 分钟(71-126)],而非城市转运[ n =5941,65 分钟(53-80)],差异具有统计学意义( p <0.001)。两组之间 30 天死亡率无显著差异(1.24%比 1.65%, p =0.13)。在生命体征异常的患者亚组中,死亡率的唯一预测因素是年龄增大、严重损伤(OR 24.87,95%CI 11.02,56.15, p <0.001)和转运到非创伤机构(OR 3.01,95%CI 1.26,7.20, p <0.05)。没有发现转运时间增加会增加 30 天死亡率的可能性。
在包含性创伤系统和既定的院前重大创伤方案的背景下,增加院前转运时间和现场位置与死亡率增加无关。