• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维分析高角型与低角型个体的上颌骨及下颌骨形态:一项横断面研究。

3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Maryland, Maryland, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Nov;26(4):687-694. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12677. Epub 2023 May 29.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12677
PMID:37246594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10592316/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals, using 3D surface models generated by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

The sample consisted of 60 CBCTs (30 males, 30 females) patients aged 12-30 years, divided into two groups comprising hyperdivergent (≥35°) and hypodivergent (≤30°) individuals, according to the mandibular plane (MP) angle. Multiplanar reconstructions were used to mark the landmarks, and 3D surface models were created to evaluate structures of the maxillomandibular complex, including condyle, ramus, symphysis and palatal height. Intergroup comparisons were performed by independent t-test. Pearson's correlation test was used (P < .05) to evaluate the correlation of the MP angle with the angles and linear measurements of other structures.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between the groups regarding condylar width, ramus height, condylar plus ramus height, mandibular length, gonial angle, palatal plane angle and palatal-mandibular angle. No differences (P > .05) were found for the condylar height, symphysis inclination angle or palatal height. Correlations (P < .05) were found between the MP angle and structures of the maxillomandibular complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperdivergent (MP ≥ 35°) and hypodivergent (MP ≤ 30°) individuals present different skeletal morphology regarding condylar width, ramus height, condylar plus ramus height, mandibular length, gonial angle, palatal plane angle and palatal-mandibular angle. There is a significant correlation between MP angle and morphological structures such as condyle, ramus, symphysis, palatal plane angle and palatal-mandibular angle.

摘要

简介

本横断面研究旨在通过锥形束 CT(CBCT)生成的 3D 表面模型,研究高角和低角患者的上颌下颌形态。

方法

该样本包括 60 名 CBCT(30 名男性,30 名女性)患者,年龄在 12-30 岁之间,根据下颌平面(MP)角分为高角(≥35°)和低角(≤30°)两组。使用多平面重建来标记标志点,并创建 3D 表面模型来评估上颌下颌复合体的结构,包括髁突、下颌支、颏联合和腭高度。通过独立 t 检验进行组间比较。使用 Pearson 相关检验(P<0.05)评估 MP 角与其他结构的角度和线性测量值之间的相关性。

结果

两组之间在髁突宽度、下颌支高度、髁突加下颌支高度、下颌长度、下颌角、腭平面角和腭-下颌角方面存在显著差异。髁突高度、颏联合倾斜角或腭高度方面无差异(P>0.05)。MP 角与上颌下颌复合体的结构之间存在相关性(P<0.05)。

结论

高角(MP≥35°)和低角(MP≤30°)个体在髁突宽度、下颌支高度、髁突加下颌支高度、下颌长度、下颌角、腭平面角和腭-下颌角方面表现出不同的骨骼形态。MP 角与髁突、下颌支、颏联合、腭平面角和腭-下颌角等形态结构之间存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study.三维分析高角型与低角型个体的上颌骨及下颌骨形态:一项横断面研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Nov;26(4):687-694. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12677. Epub 2023 May 29.
2
Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.骨性错牙合畸形的三维下颌特征:一项横断面研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Mar;85(2):134-145. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00419-1. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
3
Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.不同面部生长型个体的下颌支高度和髁突间距不对称:锥形束 CT 研究。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Feb;43(2):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02577-6. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Evaluation of associations between condylar morphology, ramus height, and mandibular plane angle in various vertical skeletal patterns: a digital radiographic study.不同垂直骨面型下颌髁突形态、升支高度与下颌平面角相关性的数字化研究
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02365-1.
5
Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.利用锥形束 CT 对不同前后向和垂直骨骼类型的髁突大小进行比较。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):306-311. doi: 10.2319/032518-229.1. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
6
Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns - a cross-sectional study.不同骨骼类型成年人髁突形态的综合 3D 分析——一项横断面研究。
Head Face Med. 2020 Nov 30;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00245-z.
7
Evaluation of Size of the Condyle in Vertical and Anteroposterior Skeletal Conditions with the Help of Cone-beam Computed Tomography.利用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估垂直和前后骨骼条件下的髁突大小。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):189-193.
8
Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study.不同矢状和垂直骨骼关系的年轻成人的前下颌牙槽骨厚度和高度的比较:一项 CBCT 研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Assessment of mandibular characteristics in patients affected with β-thalassaemia major: A retrospective case-control study.评估重型β-地中海贫血患者下颌特征:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Dec;18(4):776-783. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.基于 CBCT 图像和统计形状分析的不同垂直型类Ⅰ和类Ⅱ患者下颌横断面积形态的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.骨性错牙合畸形的三维下颌特征:一项横断面研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Mar;85(2):134-145. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00419-1. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Analysis of the Volumetric Asymmetry of the Mandibular Condyles Using CBCT.利用 CBCT 分析下颌髁突的容积不对称性。
Int Dent J. 2022 Dec;72(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.019. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
3
Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns - a cross-sectional study.
不同骨骼类型成年人髁突形态的综合 3D 分析——一项横断面研究。
Head Face Med. 2020 Nov 30;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00245-z.
4
3D Mandibular Superimposition: Comparison of Regions of Reference for Voxel-Based Registration.三维下颌骨叠加:基于体素配准的参考区域比较
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0157625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157625. eCollection 2016.
5
Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes.用于评估方向变化的通用三维坐标系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):645-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.021.
6
Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.锥束计算机断层扫描在上颌区域配准中两个参考区域的比较及可重复性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):533-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.026.
7
Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.面部表面形态可预测内部骨骼形状的变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.028.
8
Impact of different malocclusion types on the vertical mandibular asymmetry in young adult sample.不同错牙合类型对年轻成人样本下颌垂直不对称的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):373-377. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163233.
9
Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study.不同垂直生长模式的成年正畸患者下颌垂直不对称性:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):271-7. doi: 10.2319/030515-135.1. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
10
Condylar asymmetry in different occlusion types.不同咬合类型中的髁突不对称性。
Cranio. 2015 Jan;33(1):10-4. doi: 10.1179/0886963414Z.00000000039. Epub 2014 Apr 14.