Suppr超能文献

比较脾切除术联合食管胃底周围血管离断术与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症并食管胃静脉曲张再出血患者的长期疗效。

Comparison of long-term outcomes of splenectomy with periesophagogastric devascularization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in treating cirrhotic portal hypertension patients with recurrent variceal bleeding.

机构信息

Department of Hepatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Liver Transplantation, Guangzhou, 510630, China.

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 29;408(1):215. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02933-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and splenectomy with periesophagogastric devascularization (SPD) are widely used to treat cirrhotic portal hypertension (PH) and prevent variceal rebleeding. However, direct comparisons between these two approaches are rare. This study was designed to compare the long-term outcomes of TIPS and SPD in patients with cirrhotic PH and variceal rebleeding.

METHODS

The study included cirrhotic PH patients with a history of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding between 18 and 80 years of age who were admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2012 to January 2022. Patients were enrolled into two groups according to TIPS or SPD was performed. Baseline characteristics were matched using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients underwent TIPS, while 184 underwent SPD. PSM was carried out to balance available covariates, resulting in a total of 83 patients in the TIPS group and 83 patients in the SPD group. Patients in SPD group had better liver function during 60 months follow-up. Five-year overall survival rates in SPD group and TIPS group were 72 and 27%, respectively, at 2 years were 88 and 86%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year freedom from variceal rebleeding rates were 95 and 80% in SPD group and 80 and 54% in TIPS group.

CONCLUSIONS

SPD is clearly superior to TIPS in terms of OS and freedom from variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhotic PH. In addition, SPD improved liver function in patients with cirrhotic PH.

摘要

目的

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)和贲门周围血管离断术(SPD)联合脾切除术广泛用于治疗肝硬化门静脉高压(PH)和预防静脉曲张再出血。然而,这两种方法的直接比较很少。本研究旨在比较 TIPS 和 SPD 治疗肝硬化 PH 合并静脉曲张再出血患者的长期疗效。

方法

该研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间中山大学附属第三医院收治的年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间、有胃食管静脉曲张出血史的肝硬化 PH 患者。根据是否行 TIPS 或 SPD 将患者分为两组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)对基线特征进行匹配。

结果

共 230 例行 TIPS,184 例行 SPD。行 PSM 以平衡可利用的协变量,最终 TIPS 组和 SPD 组各纳入 83 例患者。SPD 组患者在 60 个月随访期间肝功能更好。SPD 组和 TIPS 组的 5 年总生存率分别为 72%和 27%,2 年生存率分别为 88%和 86%。SPD 组和 TIPS 组的 2 年和 5 年无静脉曲张再出血率分别为 95%和 80%,80%和 54%。

结论

在肝硬化 PH 患者中,SPD 在 OS 和无静脉曲张再出血方面明显优于 TIPS。此外,SPD 改善了肝硬化 PH 患者的肝功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaee/10227160/1a0e8e27785d/423_2023_2933_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验