Department of Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University/Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Email:
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology/LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
West Afr J Med. 2023 May 27;40(5):553-561.
Inhalational therapy is the cornerstone in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Patients' peak inspiratory flow impacts effective dry powder inhaler (DPI) delivery and management outcome.
This study assessed peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) and determined the factors associated with suboptimal inspiratory flow rates among COPD patients.
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 participants (30 stable COPD patients and 30 age-and-sex matched controls). Socio-demographic characteristics was obtained and spirometry was done for all participants. PIFR assessment was done using the In-Check Dial Meter and was categorized as suboptimal (< 60L/min) or optimal (≥ 60L/min). P values less than 0.05 were taken as statistically significant.
Mean age of the COPD patients and healthy controls were both 67.8 ± 10.3 years, with 53.3% being females. Post-bronchodilation FEV 1/FVC% for COPD patients was 54.15 ± 11.27%. The mean PIFR among COPD patients was significantly lower than that of healthy controls, in all DPIs simulated, especially for Clickhaler (46.2±13.4 vs 60.5±11.4L/min, p<0.001). A significant proportion of COPD patients had suboptimal PIFR, in the simulated resistances against Clickhaler and Turbuhaler (70% vs 80%; p<0.001). Older age, shorter height and low BMI were associated with suboptimal PIFR among COPD patients. However, independent predictors of suboptimal PIFR were BMI, PEFR, FEV1% and FVC%.
Suboptimal PIFR was found in a significant number of COPD patients when compared with healthy respondents. Routine assessment using In-Check Dial meter should be done to determine the suitability of dry powder inhalers for patients with COPD.
吸入疗法是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者管理的基石。患者的吸气峰流速会影响干粉吸入器(DPI)的有效输送和管理效果。
本研究评估了 COPD 患者的吸气峰流速(PIFR),并确定了与吸气流速不理想相关的因素。
对 60 名参与者(30 名稳定的 COPD 患者和 30 名年龄和性别匹配的对照者)进行了描述性横断面研究。所有参与者均进行了社会人口统计学特征的采集和肺量测定。使用 In-Check Dial 计进行 PIFR 评估,并分为不理想(<60L/min)或理想(≥60L/min)。P 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
COPD 患者和健康对照者的平均年龄均为 67.8±10.3 岁,女性占 53.3%。COPD 患者支气管扩张后的 FEV 1/FVC%为 54.15±11.27%。在所有模拟的 DPI 中,COPD 患者的平均 PIFR明显低于健康对照组,尤其是在 Clickhaler 中(46.2±13.4 与 60.5±11.4L/min,p<0.001)。在模拟的 Clickhaler 和 Turbuhaler 阻力下,相当比例的 COPD 患者存在吸气峰流速不理想,分别为 70%和 80%(p<0.001)。COPD 患者中,年龄较大、身高较短和 BMI 较低与吸气峰流速不理想相关。然而,BMI、PEFR、FEV1%和 FVC%是吸气峰流速不理想的独立预测因素。
与健康受访者相比,相当数量的 COPD 患者存在吸气峰流速不理想的情况。应使用 In-Check Dial 计进行常规评估,以确定 COPD 患者使用干粉吸入器的适宜性。