• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于心电图参数和临床表现的A型主动脉夹层死亡率的预测因素。

Predictive factors for type A aortic dissection mortality based on electrocardiogram parameters and clinical presentations.

作者信息

Rahmanian Mahdi, Bazrafshan Mehdi, Kamali Farnaz, Zare Maryam, Keshavarz Mohammad, Bazrafshan Hanieh, Izadpanah Payman, Mohammadi Mohammad, Zare Marjan, Bazrafshan Drissi Hamed

机构信息

Cardiovascular research center, Shiraz University of medical science, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of internal medicine, Shiraz University of medical science, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2023 Sep-Oct;80:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.05.008
PMID:37247497
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection is a rare but potentially lethal disorder and may be associated with electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. In this study, we aim to investigate ECG-related parameters alongside clinical presentations of type A aortic dissection to come up with the predictive factors for the severity of the disease and its mortality rate.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 201 patients with type A aortic dissection were studied between March 2015 and March 2020. Two expert cardiologists blinded to the diagnosis studied former and new patients' ECGs and recorded changes.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and one patients, including 143 (71.1%) men and 58 (28.9%) women, presented with acute dissection of the aorta, were studied. Forty-four (21.8%) and 84 (41.7%) patients had ST-segment elevation and depression in ECG, respectively. Bivariate analysis revealed that higher heart rate (p = 0.006), longer QTc (p = 0.044), and ST-segment elevation in aVR lead (p = 0.044) were associated with mortality in the patients. Multivariate regression showed higher heart rate (OR = 1.022, CI = 1.003-1.041, p = 0.012) and ST-segment elevation in aVR (OR = 4.854, CI = 2.255-10.477, p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased odds of mortality in aortic dissection patients. ROC curve analysis showed heart rate equal to or >60 per minute (AUC = 0.625, sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 10%, p = 0.019) and ST-segment elevation in aVR >0.5 mm (AUC = 0.854, sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 92%, p < 0.001) were associated with a higher mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Heart rate equal or >60 and ST-segment elevation >0.5 mm in aVR lead can be used as predictive factors for mortality of patients with type A aortic dissection.

摘要

背景

主动脉夹层是一种罕见但可能致命的疾病,可能与心电图(ECG)改变有关。在本研究中,我们旨在研究与A型主动脉夹层临床表现相关的心电图参数,以找出该疾病严重程度及其死亡率的预测因素。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,对2015年3月至2020年3月期间的201例A型主动脉夹层患者进行了研究。两名对诊断不知情的心脏专家研究了新老患者的心电图并记录变化。

结果

研究了201例急性主动脉夹层患者,其中男性143例(71.1%),女性58例(28.9%)。心电图ST段抬高和压低的患者分别为44例(21.8%)和84例(41.7%)。双变量分析显示,心率较高(p = 0.006)、QTc较长(p = 0.044)以及aVR导联ST段抬高(p = 0.044)与患者死亡率相关。多变量回归显示,心率较高(OR = 1.022,CI = 1.003 - 1.041,p = 0.012)和aVR导联ST段抬高(OR = 4.854,CI = 2.255 - 10.477,p < 0.001)与主动脉夹层患者死亡率增加独立相关。ROC曲线分析显示,心率等于或>60次/分钟(AUC = 0.625,敏感性 = 86%,特异性 = 10%,p = 0.019)和aVR导联ST段抬高>0.5 mm(AUC = 0.854,敏感性 = 75%,特异性 = 92%,p < 0.001)与较高的死亡率相关。

结论

心率等于或>60次/分钟以及aVR导联ST段抬高>0.5 mm可作为A型主动脉夹层患者死亡率的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for type A aortic dissection mortality based on electrocardiogram parameters and clinical presentations.基于心电图参数和临床表现的A型主动脉夹层死亡率的预测因素。
J Electrocardiol. 2023 Sep-Oct;80:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Evaluation of ST segment elevation criteria for the prehospital electrocardiographic diagnosis fo acute myocardial infarction.院前心电图诊断急性心肌梗死时ST段抬高标准的评估
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70002-8.
3
Information on myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias added by prehospital electrocardiograms.增加了院前心电图的心肌缺血和心律失常信息。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):187-92. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.755583. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
4
Electrocardiography changes in acute aortic dissection-association with troponin leak, coronary anatomy, and prognosis.急性主动脉夹层的心电图变化——与肌钙蛋白泄漏、冠状动脉解剖结构及预后的关系
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
5
Frequency and implication of ST-T abnormalities on hospital admission electrocardiograms in patients with type A acute aortic dissection.急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者入院时心电图 ST-T 异常的频率及其意义。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 1;112(3):424-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.050. Epub 2013 May 1.
6
Electrocardiographic differentiation of early repolarization from subtle anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.心电图对早期复极与细微前壁 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的鉴别诊断。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):45-56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
7
Predictive Value of ST-Segment Elevation in Lead aVR for Left Main and/or Three-Vessel Disease in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.aVR导联ST段抬高对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者左主干和/或三支血管病变的预测价值
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 Jan;21(1):91-7. doi: 10.1111/anec.12272. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Patients With Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Presenting With an Abnormal Electrocardiogram.伴有异常心电图表现的A型急性主动脉夹层患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.063. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
9
Prognostic significance of ST segment changes in lead aVR in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation.急性下壁伴 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者 aVR 导联 ST 段变化的预后意义。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(2):111-8.
10
Clinical utility of aVR lead T-wave in electrocardiogram of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者心电图中 aVR 导联 T 波的临床应用价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Oct 28;21(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02335-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Heart Rate and Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis.急性主动脉夹层患者心率与死亡风险的关系:一项荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 27;26(5):27755. doi: 10.31083/RCM27755. eCollection 2025 May.