Growth assessment of pure ground-glass nodules on CT: comparison of density and size measurement methods.

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences of size and density measurements in assessing pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) growth, and compare the growth rates and growth proportions of the two methods during follow-up period.

METHODS

Ninety patients with at least 3 consecutive thin-section chest CTs and confirmed 103 pGGNs on baseline CT were enrolled retrospectively. Using the two definitions of size and density to evaluate pGGNs growth with semi-automated segmentation. Then, the two methods were compared to assess differences in pGGNs growth.

RESULTS

For the size and density methods to assess nodule growth, 50.5% and 26.2% showed interval growth at the last CT (p < 0.001). Among the 19 nodules that grew in both size and density, the volume doubling time (VDT) of solid component (mean, 317.1; standard deviation, 224.8 days) was shorter than total VDT (median, 942.8; range, 400.1-2315.9 days) (p < 0.001). Of the 27 growth pGGNs assessed by the density method, the growth rates at years 1 and 2 were 25.9% and 63.0%, while the growth rates of 52 growing nodules assessed by size method were 11.5% and 48.1%, respectively. Twenty of 103 (19.4%) nodules were classified into category 4A lesions, and 7 (6.8%) were 4B lesions.

CONCLUSION

Compared to size measurements, observed density increases have a higher proportion of early growth and faster growth rates in growing nodules. Clinicians need to pay close attention to the nodules of new solid components and make timely decision management.