Cen Feng, Sun Xu, Pan Zhiping, Yan Qiang
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China.
The Affiliated Huzhou Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Huzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 11;10:1127122. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1127122. eCollection 2023.
Postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with low survival rates. While HCC treatment options have expanded substantially, they are accompanied by several challenges. This study assessed the outcomes of repeated hepatectomy (RH) for postoperative intrahepatic recurrence of HCC among patients undergoing initial hepatectomy (IH) as well as independent risk factors for HCC recurrence among patients undergoing repeated hepatectomy (RH).
Clinical data from 84 patients undergoing both IH and RH and 66 recurrent HCC patients who had received radiofrequency ablation (RFA) from July 2011 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The following groups were compared: (1) RH Group A ( = 84), (2) IH Group ( = 84, same individuals as RH Group A), (3) RH Group B ( = 45/84 from RH Group A), and (4) RFA Group ( = 66). The clinical pathology and operative characteristics of the patients in RH Group A were compared to those in the IH Group. Meanwhile, the clinical pathology and pre- and post-treatment features of the patients in RH Group B were compared to those in the RFA Group. The tumor-free survival time was compared between patients in RH Group A and the IH Group as well as between patients in RH Group B and the RFA Group. The independent risk factors for the 1-year postoperative tumor-free survival of RH Group A patients were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Measures of clinical pathology, including AFP, Child-Pugh score, HBV-DNA, tumor number, liver cirrhosis, tumor differentiation, surgical approach, and TNM stage differed significantly between patients in RH Group A and the IH Group (all < 0.05), with the exception of tumor number and tumor size (both > 0.05). No significant differences were found in these measures between the patients in RH Group B and the RFA Group (all > 0.05). While patients in the RH Group A had a longer operation time than those in the IH Group (4.35 ± 1.25 h vs. 3.55 ± 0.92 h, < 0.001), the level of intraoperative bleeding was similar (400.00 ± 199.25 ml vs. 359.40 ± 213.37 ml, = 0.204). RH Group B patients had a longer hospitalization time than those in the RFA Group (6.5 ± 0.8 d vs. 5.5 ± 1.1 d, < 0.001), however, the difference in hospitalization costs was not statistically significant (29,009 ± 3,806 CNY vs. 29,944 ± 3,752 CNY, = 0.202). Five-day post-operative serum biomarker levels, including direct bilirubin (DB) and albumin (ALB), were significantly higher in RH Group B than in the RFA Group (all < 0.05), with the exception of ALT, AST, and total bilirubin (TB) (all > 0.05). Patients in RH Group A had a lower tumor-free survival time than those in the IH Group (median: 12 vs. 22 months, < 0.001), and patients in the RH Group B had a significantly higher tumor-free survival time than those in the RFA group (median: 15 months vs. 8 months, < 0.001). Age ≥50 y, Child-Pugh class A, and negative HBV-DNA were independent risk factors that positively impacted the 1-year postoperative tumor-free survival rate of postoperative intrahepatic recurrent HCC patients undergoing RH ( < 0.001, respectively).
Due to the potential of harm related to relapse of recurrent HCC for cancer patients, RH is a superior option. RH could offer better outcomes for recurrent HCC patients undergoing IH. Compared with lesion pathology, the better target organ of the liver will be key to ameliorating tumor-free survival for recurrent HCC patients undergoing RH.
肝细胞癌(HCC)术后复发与低生存率相关。虽然HCC的治疗选择已大幅扩展,但也伴随着若干挑战。本研究评估了接受初次肝切除术(IH)的患者中HCC术后肝内复发接受再次肝切除术(RH)的结局,以及接受再次肝切除术(RH)的患者中HCC复发的独立危险因素。
回顾性分析2011年7月至2017年9月期间84例接受了IH和RH的患者以及66例接受了射频消融(RFA)的复发性HCC患者的临床资料。比较以下几组:(1)RH A组(n = 84),(2)IH组(n = 84,与RH A组为同一批个体),(3)RH B组(n = 45/84来自RH A组),以及(4)RFA组(n = 66)。将RH A组患者的临床病理和手术特征与IH组进行比较。同时,将RH B组患者的临床病理以及治疗前后特征与RFA组进行比较。比较RH A组与IH组患者以及RH B组与RFA组患者的无瘤生存时间。采用单因素和多因素分析研究RH A组患者术后1年无瘤生存的独立危险因素。
RH A组与IH组患者之间的临床病理指标,包括甲胎蛋白(AFP)、Child-Pugh评分、乙肝病毒脱氧核糖核酸(HBV-DNA)、肿瘤数量、肝硬化、肿瘤分化、手术方式和TNM分期,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05),但肿瘤数量和肿瘤大小除外(均P > 0.05)。RH B组与RFA组患者之间这些指标无显著差异(均P > 0.05)。虽然RH A组患者的手术时间比IH组患者长(4.35 ± 1.25小时 vs. 3.55 ± 0.92小时,P <\u200b 0.001),但术中出血量水平相似(400.00 ± 199.25毫升 vs. 359.40 ± 213.37毫升,P = 0.204)。RH B组患者的住院时间比RFA组患者长(6.5 ± 0.8天 vs. 5.5 ± 1.1天,P <\u200b 0.001),然而,住院费用差异无统计学意义(29,009 ± 3,806元 vs. 29,944 ± 3,752元,P = 0.202)。术后第5天的血清生物标志物水平,包括直接胆红素(DB)和白蛋白(ALB),RH B组显著高于RFA组(均P <\u200b 0.05),但谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)和总胆红素(TB)除外(均P > 0.05)。RH A组患者的无瘤生存时间比IH组患者短(中位数:12个月 vs. 22个月,P <\u200b 0.001),RH B组患者的无瘤生存时间显著高于RFA组(中位数:15个月 vs. 8个月,P <\u200b 0.001)。年龄≥50岁、Child-Pugh A级和HBV-DNA阴性是对接受RH的术后肝内复发性HCC患者术后1年无瘤生存率有积极影响的独立危险因素(分别为P <\u200b 0.001)。
由于复发性HCC复发对癌症患者存在潜在危害,RH是一种更优选择。RH可为接受IH的复发性HCC患者提供更好的结局。与病灶病理相比,肝脏这一更好的靶器官将是改善接受RH的复发性HCC患者无瘤生存的关键。