• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复肝切除术与射频消融治疗复发性肝细胞癌:平均治疗效果分析。

Repeat hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an average treatment effect analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia Level 5, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.

Duke-National University of Singapore (NUS) Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7731-7740. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09948-2. Epub 2021 May 9.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-09948-2
PMID:33969464
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver with high rates of recurrence post-resection. Repeat hepatectomy (RH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the mainstays for managing recurrent HCC following initial curative resection. This retrospective study aims to determine the average treatment effect of RH and RFA in patients with recurrent HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2016, a total of 219 consecutive patients with recurrent HCC who underwent either RH or RFA were included in the study. The analysis was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and propensity score-matched (PSM) methods.

RESULTS

The minor and major post-operative morbidity after propensity score-matched analysis for the RH group was 30.0% and 6.0%, respectively, and 19.2% and 0.0% (p = 0.1006), respectively, for the RFA group. After propensity score matching, the median OS for RH and RFA was 85.5 (IQR, 33.5-not reached) and 53.3 months (IQR, 27.5-not reached) (p = 0.8474), respectively. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between both groups (p = 0.1287). RH showed improved long-term overall survival over RFA at the third [71.3% versus 65.7% (p = 0.0432)], fifth [59.9% versus 45.4% (p = 0.0271)] and tenth [35.4% versus 32.2% (p = 0.0132)] year follow-up, respectively. Median time to recurrence was 11.1 (IQR, 5.0-33.2) and 28.0 months (IQR, 9.1-not reached) (p = 0.0225) for the RFA and RH group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RH confers a late survival benefit compared with RFA for patients with recurrent HCC despite a higher morbidity rate.

摘要

背景

肝细胞癌(HCC)是肝脏最常见的原发性恶性肿瘤,其切除术后复发率很高。再次肝切除术(RH)和射频消融术(RFA)是治疗初始根治性切除术后复发性 HCC 的主要方法。本回顾性研究旨在确定 RH 和 RFA 治疗复发性 HCC 患者的平均治疗效果。

患者和方法

2000 年至 2016 年,共有 219 例接受 RH 或 RFA 治疗的复发性 HCC 患者纳入本研究。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法进行分析。

结果

经过倾向评分匹配分析,RH 组术后轻微和主要并发症的发生率分别为 30.0%和 6.0%,RFA 组分别为 19.2%和 0.0%(p=0.1006)。倾向评分匹配后,RH 和 RFA 的中位 OS 分别为 85.5(IQR,33.5-未达到)和 53.3 个月(IQR,27.5-未达到)(p=0.8474)。两组 90 天死亡率无显著差异(p=0.1287)。RH 在第三个[71.3%比 65.7%(p=0.0432)]、第五个[59.9%比 45.4%(p=0.0271)]和第十个[35.4%比 32.2%(p=0.0132)]年随访时,总体生存率均高于 RFA。RFA 和 RH 组的中位复发时间分别为 11.1(IQR,5.0-33.2)和 28.0 个月(IQR,9.1-未达到)(p=0.0225)。

结论

尽管 RH 术后并发症发生率较高,但与 RFA 相比,RH 可为复发性 HCC 患者带来生存获益。

相似文献

1
Repeat hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an average treatment effect analysis.重复肝切除术与射频消融治疗复发性肝细胞癌:平均治疗效果分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7731-7740. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09948-2. Epub 2021 May 9.
2
Radiofrequency ablation versus repeat resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 5 cm) after initial curative resection.射频消融与再次切除治疗初始根治性切除后复发的≤5cm 肝细胞癌。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6357-6368. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06990-8. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation versus hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after initial surgery: a propensity score matching study.经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融与肝切除术治疗初始手术后复发性肝细胞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3522-3531. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5166-4. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Clinical outcomes of surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation in very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.非常早期肝细胞癌手术切除与射频消融治疗的临床结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01995-z.
5
The 10-year Survival Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma 5 cm or Smaller: Primary versus Recurrent HCC.单发 5cm 或以下肝癌射频消融治疗的 10 年生存分析:原发性与复发性 HCC。
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):458-469. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021200153. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Repeat hepatic resection combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatic resection alone for recurrent and multiple hepatocellular carcinoma patients meeting the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A: A propensity score-matched analysis.再次肝切除联合术中射频消融与单独再次肝切除治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期 A 期符合条件的复发性和多发性肝细胞癌患者:倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9213-9227. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5662. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Repeat hepatectomy versus microwave ablation for solitary and small (≤3 cm) recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with early or late recurrence: A propensity score matched study.肝切除与微波消融治疗早期或晚期复发的孤立性小(≤3 cm)复发性肝细胞癌的倾向评分匹配研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 May;49(5):1001-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.12.016. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
The risk factors for long-term survival outcome in solitary hepatocellular carcinoma up to 2 cm: Propensity score matching analysis in a population cohort with a high rate of HBV infection.2cm 以内单发肝细胞癌长期生存预后的危险因素:高乙肝病毒感染率人群队列的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
9
Radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in subcapsular location: a retrospective cohort study.射频消融与重复肝切除术治疗包膜下位置复发性肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun 14;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02277-4.
10
Treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation versus liver transplantation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a population-based study.射频消融与肝移植和手术切除治疗米兰标准内肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5379-5389. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07551-9. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the evidence for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Surgery radiofrequency ablation through sentiment and meta-analysis.通过情感分析和荟萃分析梳理肝细胞癌治疗的证据:手术与射频消融
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 May 24;16(5):105881. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.105881.
2
Efficacy of repeat hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis.复发性肝细胞癌再次肝切除术与射频消融术的疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 26;15:1559491. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1559491. eCollection 2025.
3
Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation versus radiofrequency ablation: analysis of its efficacy and safety.
射频消融术后辅助索拉非尼治疗肝细胞癌与单纯射频消融治疗的疗效及安全性分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 4;14:1383312. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383312. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a SEER population-based propensity score matching study.小肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜肝切除术与射频消融术的比较:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库人群的倾向评分匹配研究
Updates Surg. 2024 Dec;76(8):2755-2766. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02016-w. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
5
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver surgery and thermal ablations: state of the art and future perspectives.肝切除术后及热消融后肝细胞癌复发的管理:现状与未来展望
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):71-88. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-579. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
Recent advances in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma therapy.复发性肝细胞癌治疗的最新进展
World J Hepatol. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):460-476. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.460.
7
Repeat hepatic resection combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatic resection alone for recurrent and multiple hepatocellular carcinoma patients meeting the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A: A propensity score-matched analysis.再次肝切除联合术中射频消融与单独再次肝切除治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期 A 期符合条件的复发性和多发性肝细胞癌患者:倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9213-9227. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5662. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
8
Meta-Analysis of Repeat Hepatectomy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌复发行再次肝切除术与射频消融术的Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;14(21):5398. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215398.
9
The role of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.再次切除术在复发性肝细胞癌中的作用。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2381-2391. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02545-1. Epub 2022 May 23.
10
Repeat hepatic resection versus percutaneous ablation for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis.再次肝切除术与经皮消融治疗复发性肝细胞癌:荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2022 Mar 8;6(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac036.