Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征中的 P2Y12 抑制剂:基于真实世界的、社区为基础的缺血和出血结局比较。

P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Real-World, Community-Based Comparison of Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Walnut Creek, California, USA.

Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2023 May 20;2023:1147352. doi: 10.1155/2023/1147352. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have shown superiority of the novel P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but clinical benefit in the community remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel to ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and were discharged with clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel from 2012 to 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We used Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score matching to evaluate the association of the P2Y12 agent with the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and bleeding events.

RESULTS

The study included 15,476 patients (93.1% on clopidogrel, 3.6% on ticagrelor and 3.2% on prasugrel). Compared to the clopidogrel group, ticagrelorand prasugrel patients were younger with less comorbidities. In multivariable models with propensity-score matching, we found a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the ticagrelor vs the clopidogrel group (HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.20-0.92)), but no differences in the other endpoints, and no difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel among any endpoints. A larger proportion of patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel switched to an alternative P2Y12 agent vs. clopidogrel ( < 0.01), and a higher level of persistence was seen among patients on clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor ( = 0.03) or prasugrel ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with ACS who underwent PCI, we observed a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients treated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, but no difference in other clinical endpoints nor any differences in endpoints between prasugrel vs. clopidogrel users. These results suggest that further study is needed to identify an optimal P2Y12 inhibitor in a real-world population.

摘要

背景

随机试验已经证明,新型 P2Y12 抑制剂在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中的疗效优于氯吡格雷,但在社区中的临床获益仍存在争议。我们的目的是在真实世界人群中比较 ACS 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛和普拉格雷的安全性和疗效。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2018 年期间在 Kaiser Permanente Northern California 接受 PCI 并出院时接受氯吡格雷、替格瑞洛或普拉格雷治疗的 ACS 患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型和倾向评分匹配来评估 P2Y12 抑制剂与全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和出血事件的主要结局之间的关联。

结果

该研究纳入了 15476 例患者(93.1%接受氯吡格雷治疗,3.6%接受替格瑞洛治疗,3.2%接受普拉格雷治疗)。与氯吡格雷组相比,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷组患者年龄较小,合并症较少。在多变量模型和倾向评分匹配后,我们发现替格瑞洛组全因死亡率风险低于氯吡格雷组(HR(95%CI)为 0.43(0.20-0.92)),但其他终点无差异,且普拉格雷与氯吡格雷之间在任何终点均无差异。与氯吡格雷相比,更多的替格瑞洛或普拉格雷患者转为其他 P2Y12 抑制剂( <0.01),且氯吡格雷组的患者较替格瑞洛( =0.03)或普拉格雷( <0.01)组的患者更能坚持用药。

结论

在接受 PCI 的 ACS 患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛治疗患者的全因死亡率风险较低,但其他临床终点无差异,普拉格雷与氯吡格雷之间的终点也无差异。这些结果表明,需要进一步研究以确定在真实世界人群中哪种 P2Y12 抑制剂最理想。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f44/10224789/66c5710d255c/JITC2023-1147352.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验