• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008-2016 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板药物初治患者中血小板二磷酸腺苷 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的使用和依从性趋势。

Trends in Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Use and Adherence Among Antiplatelet-Naive Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2016.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):943-950. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0783.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0783
PMID:29799992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6145718/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Current guidelines recommend prasugrel hydrochloride and ticagrelor hydrochloride as preferred therapies for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is not well known how frequently these newer agents are being used in clinical practice or how adherence varies among the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12) inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To determine trends in use of the different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients who underwent PCI from 2008 to 2016 in a large cohort of commercially insured patients and differences in patient adherence and costs among the P2Y12 inhibitors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study used administrative claims from a large US national insurer (ie, UnitedHealthcare) from January 1, 2008, to December 1, 2016, comprising patients aged 18 to 64 years hospitalized for PCI who had not received a P2Y12 inhibitor for 90 days preceding PCI. The P2Y12 inhibitor filled within 30 days of discharge was identified from pharmacy claims.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportion of patients filling prescriptions for P2Y12 inhibitors within 30 days of discharge by year, as well as medication possession ratios (MPRs) and total P2Y12 inhibitor copayments at 6 and 12 months for patients who received drug-eluting stents.

RESULTS

A total of 55 340 patients (12 754 [23.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 54.4 [7.1] years) who underwent PCI were included in this study. In 2008, 7667 (93.6%) patients filled a prescription for clopidogrel bisulfate and 521 (6.4%) filled no P2Y12 inhibitor prescription within 30 days of hospitalization. In 2016, 2406 (44.0%) patients filled clopidogrel prescriptions, 2015 (36.9%) filled either prasugrel or ticagrelor prescriptions, and 1045 (19.1%) patients filled no P2Y12 inhibitor prescription within 30 days of hospitalization. At 6 months, mean MPRs for patients who received a drug-eluting stent filling clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor prescriptions were 0.85 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.82-1.00), 0.79 (IQR, 0.66-1.00), and 0.76 (IQR, 0.66-0.98) (P < .001), respectively; mean copayments for a 6 months' supply were $132 (IQR, $47-$203), $287 (IQR, $152-$389), and $265 (IQR, $53-$387) (P < .001), respectively. At 12 months, mean MPRs for clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor were 0.76 (IQR, 0.58-0.99), 0.71 (IQR, 0.49-0.98), and 0.68 (IQR, 0.41-0.94) (P < .001), respectively; mean total copayments were $251 (IQR, $100-$371), $556 (IQR, $348-$730), and $557 (IQR, $233-$744) (P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Between 2008 and 2016, increased use of prasugrel and ticagrelor was accompanied by increased nonfilling of prescriptions for P2Y12 inhibitors within 30 days of discharge. Prasugrel and ticagrelor had higher patient costs and lower adherence in the year following PCI compared with clopidogrel. The introduction of newer, more expensive P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with lower adherence to these therapies.

摘要

重要性

目前的指南推荐盐酸普拉格雷和盐酸替卡格雷作为急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的首选治疗药物。然而,目前尚不清楚这些新型药物在临床实践中的使用频率如何,以及血小板二磷酸腺苷(ADP)P2Y12 受体(P2Y12)抑制剂之间的依从性差异。

目的

在一个大型商业保险公司(即联合健康保险)的患者中,确定 2008 年至 2016 年期间接受 PCI 的患者中不同 P2Y12 抑制剂的使用趋势,并确定 P2Y12 抑制剂之间的患者依从性和成本差异。

设计、地点和参与者:一项回顾性队列研究使用了来自美国大型保险公司(即联合健康保险)的行政索赔数据,时间为 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 1 日,包括年龄在 18 至 64 岁之间、因 PCI 住院且在 PCI 前 90 天内未使用 P2Y12 抑制剂的患者。出院后 30 天内开出的 P2Y12 抑制剂可从药房索赔中确定。

主要结局和测量

每年出院后 30 天内开具 P2Y12 抑制剂处方的患者比例,以及接受药物洗脱支架治疗的患者在 6 个月和 12 个月时的药物利用率(MPR)和总 P2Y12 抑制剂共付额。

结果

共纳入 55340 例接受 PCI 的患者(女性 12754 例[23.0%];平均[标准差]年龄 54.4[7.1]岁)。2008 年,7667 例(93.6%)患者开具了硫酸氯吡格雷双羟萘酸盐处方,521 例(6.4%)患者在住院期间未开具任何 P2Y12 抑制剂处方。2016 年,2406 例(44.0%)患者开具氯吡格雷处方,2015 例(36.9%)患者开具普拉格雷或替卡格雷处方,1045 例(19.1%)患者在出院后 30 天内未开具任何 P2Y12 抑制剂处方。在 6 个月时,接受药物洗脱支架治疗的患者服用氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替卡格雷的平均 MPR 分别为 0.85(四分位距[IQR],0.82-1.00)、0.79(IQR,0.66-1.00)和 0.76(IQR,0.66-0.98)(P<.001);6 个月的平均共付额分别为 132 美元(IQR,47-203 美元)、287 美元(IQR,152-389 美元)和 265 美元(IQR,53-387 美元)(P<.001)。在 12 个月时,氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替卡格雷的平均 MPR 分别为 0.76(IQR,0.58-0.99)、0.71(IQR,0.49-0.98)和 0.68(IQR,0.41-0.94)(P<.001);总共付额分别为 251 美元(IQR,100-371 美元)、556 美元(IQR,348-730 美元)和 557 美元(IQR,233-744 美元)(P<.001)。

结论和相关性

2008 年至 2016 年期间,普拉格雷和替卡格雷的使用增加伴随着出院后 30 天内不服用 P2Y12 抑制剂的处方增加。与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷和替卡格雷在 PCI 后一年的患者费用更高,依从性更低。新型、更昂贵的 P2Y12 抑制剂的引入与这些治疗方法的依从性降低有关。

相似文献

1
Trends in Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Use and Adherence Among Antiplatelet-Naive Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2016.2008-2016 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板药物初治患者中血小板二磷酸腺苷 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的使用和依从性趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):943-950. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0783.
2
Physician and Hospital Utilization of P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Research to Practice Initiative.美国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中P2Y12抑制剂的医生及医院使用情况:一项来自国家心血管数据注册中心“研究到实践”倡议的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006275. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
Assessing the Clinical Treatment Dynamics of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US.评估美国急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的临床治疗动态。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238585. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8585.
4
Impact of Society Guidelines on Trends in Use of Newer P2Y Inhibitors for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.社会指南对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者新型 P2Y12 抑制剂使用趋势的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e034414. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034414. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Trends for and Clinical Factors Associated with Choice of Oral P2Y Inhibitors for Patients on Chronic Dialysis.慢性透析患者口服 P2Y 抑制剂选择的趋势及相关临床因素。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019 Oct;33(5):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06913-w.
6
Short- and Midterm Adherence to Platelet P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(支架)术后短期和中期血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的依从性。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;25(5):466-471. doi: 10.1177/1074248420926667. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
Antiplatelet Therapy Changes for Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Recurrent Ischemic Events: Insights Into Contemporary Practice From the TRANSLATE-ACS (Treatment With ADP Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study.心肌梗死伴复发性缺血事件患者的抗血小板治疗改变:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS(ADP 受体抑制剂治疗:急性冠状动脉综合征后治疗模式和事件的纵向评估)研究的当代实践见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 8;7(4):e007982. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007982.
8
A comparison of cangrelor, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中坎格雷洛、普拉格雷、替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Mar;18(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
Comparison of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Australian Population.澳大利亚人群中急性冠脉综合征的 P2Y12 抑制剂比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
A model-based analysis of the clinical and economic impact of personalising P2Y12-receptor inhibition with platelet function testing in acute coronary syndrome patients.基于模型的分析:血小板功能检测指导急性冠脉综合征患者个体化 P2Y12 受体抑制的临床和经济影响。
Thromb Haemost. 2014 Feb;111(2):290-9. doi: 10.1160/TH13-08-0679. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonadherence to Medication: The Overlooked But Critical Concern for Physicians.药物治疗不依从性:医生忽视但至关重要的问题。
JACC Asia. 2025 Jun;5(6):769-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.001.
2
Evaluation of CYP2C19 Clinical Decision Support Alerts to Guide P2Y Inhibitor Prescribing.评估CYP2C19临床决策支持警报以指导P2Y抑制剂的处方开具。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Aug;118(2):470-479. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3698. Epub 2025 May 12.
3
CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Neurointerventional Procedure.CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗与接受神经介入手术患者的临床结局
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70131. doi: 10.1111/cts.70131.
4
Nonvitamin K Anticoagulants: Risk of Bleeding When Interacting With Other Medications: A Cohort Study From Medicare.非维生素 K 拮抗剂:与其他药物相互作用时出血的风险:来自 Medicare 的队列研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):e70023. doi: 10.1002/clc.70023.
5
Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Review Topic of the Week.基于基因型的抗血小板治疗:JACC 本周综述主题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Sep 17;84(12):1107-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.038.
6
Genetic Determinants of Response to P2Y Inhibitors and Clinical Implications.P2Y 抑制剂反应的遗传决定因素及临床意义。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2024 Oct;13(4):469-481. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
7
Precision Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Precision PCI) Registry - Informing optimal antiplatelet strategies.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的精准抗血小板治疗(Precision PCI)注册研究——为优化抗血小板策略提供信息。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e70004. doi: 10.1111/cts.70004.
8
Impact of proton pump inhibitor use on clinical outcomes in East Asian patients receiving clopidogrel following drug-eluting stent implantation.质子泵抑制剂的使用对东亚经药物洗脱支架置入术后接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者临床结局的影响。
BMC Med. 2024 Aug 15;22(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03549-y.
9
Disparity in the Under-Utilization of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者新型P2Y12抑制剂使用不足的差异
Cardiol Res. 2024 Jun;15(3):129-133. doi: 10.14740/cr1528. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
10
Patient and Physician Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome.患者与医生对急性冠状动脉综合征抗血小板治疗的获益与风险的看法
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Sep;13(3):631-643. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00372-7. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary use of P2Y12-inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Austria: A prospective, multi-centre registry.奥地利接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中P2Y12抑制剂的当代应用:一项前瞻性多中心注册研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 20;12(6):e0179349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179349. eCollection 2017.
2
Contemporary Trends in Oral Antiplatelet Agent Use in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者中口服抗血小板药物的应用趋势。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):57-63. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.57.
3
Early Cessation of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors Among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study (Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者中,二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂的早期停用:来自TRANSLATE-ACS研究(二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂治疗:急性冠状动脉综合征后治疗模式和事件的纵向评估)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003602.
4
Assessment of P2Y12 inhibitor usage and switching in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.接受经皮冠状动脉血运重建的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中P2Y12抑制剂使用及转换情况的评估
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:854-859. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.144. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Understanding the Adverse Effects of Ticagrelor in Practice.了解替格瑞洛在实际应用中的不良反应。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;1(4). doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1018.
6
Long-term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for the Secondary Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Secondary Analysis of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial.替格瑞洛用于主要不良心血管事件二级预防的长期耐受性:PEGASUS-TIMI 54 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;1(4):425-32. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1017.
7
2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠状动脉疾病患者双联抗血小板治疗时长的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南、2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉旁路移植手术指南、2012年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国内科医师学会/美国胸外科医师协会/美国预防心脏病学会/心血管造影和介入学会/美国胸外科医师学会稳定型缺血性心脏病患者诊断和管理指南、2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南、2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南以及2014年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会非心脏手术患者围手术期心血管评估和管理指南的更新
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e123-55. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000404. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Voluntary Public Reporting Program: An Interim Report From the NCDR Public Reporting Advisory Group.国家心血管数据注册中心自愿公开报告项目:来自NCDR公开报告咨询小组的中期报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 19;67(2):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
Treatment pattern of contemporary dual antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征后当代双重抗血小板治疗的治疗模式:一项基于瑞典全国人群的队列研究。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016;50(2):99-107. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2015.1119304. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
Medication Adherence Measures: An Overview.药物依从性测量:概述
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:217047. doi: 10.1155/2015/217047. Epub 2015 Oct 11.