Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Endocr Rev. 2023 Nov 9;44(6):975-1011. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnad016.
It is estimated that 2% to 3% of the population are currently prescribed systemic or topical glucocorticoid treatment. The potent anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids to deliver therapeutic benefit is not in doubt. However, the side effects associated with their use, including central weight gain, hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and osteoporosis, often collectively termed iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome, are associated with a significant health and economic burden. The precise cellular mechanisms underpinning the differential action of glucocorticoids to drive the desirable and undesirable effects are still not completely understood. Faced with the unmet clinical need to limit glucocorticoid-induced adverse effects alongside ensuring the preservation of anti-inflammatory actions, several strategies have been pursued. The coprescription of existing licensed drugs to treat incident adverse effects can be effective, but data examining the prevention of adverse effects are limited. Novel selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists and selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators have been designed that aim to specifically and selectively activate anti-inflammatory responses based upon their interaction with the glucocorticoid receptor. Several of these compounds are currently in clinical trials to evaluate their efficacy. More recently, strategies exploiting tissue-specific glucocorticoid metabolism through the isoforms of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase has shown early potential, although data from clinical trials are limited. The aim of any treatment is to maximize benefit while minimizing risk, and within this review we define the adverse effect profile associated with glucocorticoid use and evaluate current and developing strategies that aim to limit side effects but preserve desirable therapeutic efficacy.
据估计,目前有 2%至 3%的人口接受全身性或局部性糖皮质激素治疗。糖皮质激素具有强大的抗炎作用,能带来治疗益处,这一点毋庸置疑。然而,其使用相关的副作用,包括中心性体重增加、高血压、胰岛素抵抗、2 型糖尿病(T2D)和骨质疏松症,通常统称为医源性库欣综合征,会给患者带来严重的健康和经济负担。糖皮质激素发挥理想和不理想作用的具体细胞机制仍不完全清楚。由于临床需要限制糖皮质激素引起的不良反应,同时确保保留抗炎作用,因此人们采取了几种策略。联合使用现有的已批准药物来治疗新出现的不良反应可能是有效的,但关于预防不良反应的数据有限。目前正在临床试验中评估几种新型选择性糖皮质激素受体激动剂和选择性糖皮质激素受体调节剂的疗效,这些药物旨在基于与糖皮质激素受体的相互作用,特异性和选择性地激活抗炎反应。最近,通过 11β-羟甾体脱氢酶同工型来利用组织特异性糖皮质激素代谢的策略显示出了早期潜力,尽管临床试验的数据有限。任何治疗的目的都是在最大程度地获益的同时将风险最小化,在本次综述中,我们定义了与糖皮质激素使用相关的不良反应谱,并评估了旨在限制副作用但保留理想治疗效果的现有和新兴策略。