Suppr超能文献

手部手术后患者报告结局测量的自动化

Automating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Hand Surgery.

作者信息

Hijji Fady Y, London Daniel A, Schneider Andrew D, Via Garrhett G, Franko Orrin I

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH.

Mary S. Stern Hand Surgery Fellowship, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Dec;49(12):1272.e1-1272.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 May 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the overall response rate of patients receiving electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) following hand surgery and to determine the patient characteristics associated with responding.

METHODS

A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, web-based system was developed to automatically distribute ePROMs to patients undergoing hand surgery at five institutions with 22 surgeons. Patients who were at least 18 years old were eligible. The PROMs used were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH). After surgery, ePROMs along with a satisfaction questionnaire were electronically sent three, six, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 6458 patients were eligible. Of these, 80% were enrolled voluntarily. Among these, 70% completed ePROMs for at least one postoperative time point, whereas 30% did not complete any. Among responders, 28% completed all five time points, whereas 72% completed four or fewer time points. Incomplete responders were more likely to be insured by workers' compensation when compared to complete responders. Incomplete responders exhibited higher baseline QuickDASH scores and similar baseline VAS compared to complete responders. During the follow-up, incomplete responders demonstrated worse VAS and QuickDASH scores at all time points. Finally, in comparison with complete responders, incomplete responders were less likely to be satisfied with their surgery at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that automated email-based ePROM systems may be an effective method for survey distribution. Particularly for simple, outpatient surgeries, this study illustrates the potential for clinical use of the data obtained from these systems.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patient-reported outcome measures continue to have an expanding role in health care with the rise of valued-based systems. Electronic PROMs are a relatively unexplored medium that may offer a viable alternative to more effectively collecting these valuable patient metrics.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估接受手部手术后使用电子患者报告结局测量(ePROMs)的患者的总体反应率,并确定与做出反应相关的患者特征。

方法

开发了一个符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的基于网络的系统,以自动向五家机构中22位外科医生进行手部手术的患者分发ePROMs。年龄至少18岁的患者符合条件。所使用的患者报告结局测量工具为疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表(QuickDASH)。手术后,在术后3周、6周、12周、24周和52周以电子方式发送ePROMs以及一份满意度调查问卷。

结果

共有6458名患者符合条件。其中,80%自愿参与。在这些患者中,70%在至少一个术后时间点完成了ePROMs,而30%未完成任何一个。在做出反应的患者中,28%完成了所有五个时间点的测量,而72%完成了四个或更少时间点的测量。与完全做出反应的患者相比,未完全做出反应的患者更有可能由工人赔偿保险承保。与完全做出反应的患者相比,未完全做出反应的患者表现出更高的基线QuickDASH评分和相似的基线VAS评分。在随访期间,未完全做出反应的患者在所有时间点的VAS和QuickDASH评分均较差。最后,与完全做出反应的患者相比,未完全做出反应的患者在所有时间点对手术的满意度都较低。

结论

本研究表明,基于电子邮件的自动ePROM系统可能是一种有效的调查分发方法。特别是对于简单的门诊手术,本研究说明了从这些系统获得的数据在临床应用中的潜力。

临床意义

随着价值导向型医疗系统的兴起,患者报告结局测量在医疗保健中的作用不断扩大。电子患者报告结局测量是一种相对未被充分探索的媒介,可能为更有效地收集这些有价值的患者指标提供一种可行的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验