Suppr超能文献

基于加速度计的身体活动水平在生理跌倒风险与跌倒恐惧不匹配的老年人中。

Levels of Accelerometer-Based Physical Activity in Older Adults With a Mismatch Between Physiological Fall Risk and Fear of Falling.

出版信息

J Gerontol Nurs. 2023 Jun;49(6):41-49. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20230512-06. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Abstract

We examined the associations between levels of accelerometer-based physical activity and the mismatch of physiological fall risk and fear of falling (FOF) in community-dwelling older adults. We assessed 123 participants who received 7-day wrist-worn accelerometry. Physiological fall risk was assessed using the portable BTrackS™ balance system and FOF was assessed using a short version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Participants were categorized into four groups: rational (low FOF/normal balance), irrational (high FOF/normal balance), incongruent (low FOF/poor balance), and congruent (high FOF/poor balance). One third of older adults had a mismatch between their FOF and actual fall risk. Accelerometer-based moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was significantly different in the irrational group compared to the rational group ( = 0.023) and the congruent group compared to the rational group ( = 0.032). Encouraging older adults to improve MVPA may prevent them from shifting from rational to irrational or congruent groups, thereby reducing the risk of injurious falls. [(6), 41-49.].

摘要

我们研究了社区居住的老年人中基于加速度计的身体活动水平与生理跌倒风险和跌倒恐惧(FOF)不匹配之间的关联。我们评估了 123 名接受了 7 天腕戴加速度计的参与者。生理跌倒风险使用便携式 BTrackS™平衡系统进行评估,FOF 使用国际跌倒效能量表的简短版本进行评估。参与者被分为四组:理性(低 FOF/正常平衡)、非理性(高 FOF/正常平衡)、不一致(低 FOF/平衡差)和一致(高 FOF/平衡差)。三分之一的老年人的 FOF 和实际跌倒风险不匹配。与理性组相比,非理性组和一致组的基于加速度计的中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)有显著差异( = 0.023)和一致组与理性组相比( = 0.032)。鼓励老年人增加 MVPA 可能会阻止他们从理性组转变为非理性或一致组,从而降低受伤性跌倒的风险。 [(6), 41-49.].

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e9/10513747/f5e73235731b/nihms-1928965-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验