Suppr超能文献

三种不同技术分离器械取出后牙本质结构丧失的评估:一项离体研究。

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt.

Private Practice, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Endod J. 2023 May;8(3):225-230. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.37929.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit.

METHODS

Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean+-standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed.

RESULTS

Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn't any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815).

CONCLUSION

TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals. (EEJ-2023-01-01).

摘要

目的

评估使用 Ruddle 技术、Terauchi 文件检索套件(TFRK)和 Endo Rescue 套件从根管中段成功取出分离器械、根管体积变化和检索时间的成功率。

方法

选择 60 颗下颌第一磨牙,在中度弯曲近颊根管的中段分离 4mm 的 #25/.04 旋转锉。将牙齿随机分为三组(n=20):R 组,根据 Ruddle 技术取出分离的文件;T 组,使用 TFRK 取出分离的文件;E 组,使用 Endo Rescue 套件取出分离的文件。使用 IBM SPSS 分析数值。结果以根管体积和时间的平均值+标准差和 95%置信区间以及成功率的频率(%)表示。评估组间时间、根管体积和成功率差异的比较。

结果

R 和 T 组的检索均成功(分别为 70%和 80%),两组之间无显著差异(p=0.715),而 E 组没有任何成功样本(0.0%),与 R 和 T 组之间有显著差异(p<0.001,p<0.001)。E 组的根管体积增加最大,其次是 R 组,而 T 组的根管体积增加最小。R 和 T 组之间的平均检索时间无显著差异(p=0.815)。

结论

TFRK 为从中度弯曲根管中段取出分离器械提供了一种更保守的方法。(EEJ-2023-01-01)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcbf/10244914/08c482e7262d/EEJ-8-225-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验