Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK; NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK; NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, UK.
Sleep Med. 2023 Jul;107:243-267. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 18.
Sleep disturbance is common in hospital. The hospital environment can have a negative impact on sleep quality, through factors such as noise, light, temperature, and nursing care disruptions. Poor sleep can lead to delays in recovery, wound healing, and increase risk of post-operative infection.
We conducted a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for improving inpatient sleep. The primary outcome was sleep quality, the secondary outcome was length of hospital stay, the harm outcome was adverse events. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 17 February 2022. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model, with narrative synthesis for studies with no useable data. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool.
76 studies identified with 5375 people randomised comparing 85 interventions. Interventions focused on physical sleep aids (n = 26), relaxation (n = 25), manual therapy (n = 12), music (n = 9), psychological therapy (n = 5), light therapy (n = 3), sleep protocols (n = 2), milk and honey (n = 1), exercise (n = 1), and nursing care (n = 1). In meta-analysis, medium to large improvements in sleep quality were noted for sleep aids, relaxation, music, and manual therapies. Results were generally consistent in studies at lower risk of bias. Length of hospital stay and adverse events were reported for some studies, with benefit in some trials but this was not consistent across all interventions.
Physical sleep aids, relaxation, manual therapy and music interventions have a strong evidence base for improving inpatient sleep quality. Research is needed to evaluate how to optimise interventions into routine care.
睡眠障碍在医院中很常见。医院环境会通过噪音、光线、温度和护理干扰等因素对睡眠质量产生负面影响。睡眠质量差会导致康复延迟、伤口愈合缓慢,并增加术后感染的风险。
我们进行了一项系统评价,评估非药物睡眠干预措施对内科住院患者睡眠的有效性。主要结局是睡眠质量,次要结局是住院时间,危害结局是不良事件。从建库到 2022 年 2 月 17 日,我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane Library。使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析,对于没有可用数据的研究进行叙述性综合。使用 Cochrane 工具评估偏倚风险。
共确定 76 项研究,涉及 5375 名随机分组的患者,比较了 85 种干预措施。干预措施集中在物理睡眠辅助(n=26)、放松(n=25)、手法治疗(n=12)、音乐(n=9)、心理治疗(n=5)、光照治疗(n=3)、睡眠方案(n=2)、牛奶加蜂蜜(n=1)、运动(n=1)和护理(n=1)。荟萃分析显示,睡眠辅助、放松、音乐和手法治疗在改善睡眠质量方面有中到大的效果。在偏倚风险较低的研究中结果基本一致。一些研究报告了住院时间和不良事件,一些试验中有获益,但并非所有干预措施都一致。
物理睡眠辅助、放松、手法治疗和音乐干预措施有很强的证据支持,可以改善内科住院患者的睡眠质量。需要研究如何将干预措施优化到常规护理中。