多布斯案之后对避孕的关注。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

A Focus on Contraception in the Wake of Dobbs.

作者信息

Salganicoff Alina, Ranji Usha

机构信息

KFF, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jul-Aug;33(4):341-344. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.002

PMID:37258339

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

A Focus on Contraception in the Wake of Dobbs.多布斯案之后对避孕的关注。

Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jul-Aug;33(4):341-344. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 May 29.

Changes in Permanent Contraception Procedures Among Young Adults Following the Dobbs Decision.多布斯裁决后年轻人永久性避孕程序的变化。

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240424. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0424.

Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后，与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势：州法律有多大影响？

JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.

Another Dobbs? The Supreme Court and the Administrative State.另一个多布斯案？最高法院与行政国家。

Soc Work. 2023 Dec 23;69(1):106-108. doi: 10.1093/sw/swad042.

Contraception, data-sharing among issues expected on Supreme Court docket.避孕、最高法院待审案件中预期出现的问题间的数据共享。

Mod Healthc. 2015 Oct 5;45(40):12.

Supreme Court considers cases on abortion and contraception ... another challenge to the ACA ... state all-payer databases.最高法院审理有关堕胎和避孕的案件……对《平价医疗法案》的又一挑战……州全支付方数据库。

Mod Healthc. 2016 Jan 4;46(1):20.

The right to privacy expanded: state infringements upon decisions affecting contraception subjected to strict scrutiny.隐私权得到扩展：国家对影响避孕决策的干预受到严格审查。

Loyola Law Rev. 1978 Winter;24(1):149-63.

Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.医学人类学学会就最高法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的声明

Med Anthropol Q. 2022 Dec;36(4):433-441. doi: 10.1111/maq.12741. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.违背人民意愿：美国最高法院推翻堕胎权。

Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Oct-Dec;VII(4):261-263. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2022.057. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

ACA Heads Back To Supreme Court.ACA 重返最高法院。

Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Aug;38(8):1257-1258. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00880. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

Contraception Coverage Policy in the United States: History and Current Challenges.美国的避孕覆盖政策：历史与当前挑战

Womens Health Issues. 2025 May-Jun;35(3):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

Contraceptive use among transgender men and gender diverse individuals in the United States: Reasons for use, non-use, and methods used for pregnancy prevention.美国跨性别男性和性别多样化个体的避孕措施使用情况：使用、不使用的原因以及预防怀孕所采用的方法

Contraception. 2025 Jan;141:110719. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110719. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

Contraceptive uptake in postpartum people with and without opioid use disorder and opioid use with co-occurring substance use.有和没有阿片类物质使用障碍的产后人群以及同时存在物质使用情况时的阿片类物质使用与避孕药具的使用情况

Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Jun 24;12:100248. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100248. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.美国最高法院“多布斯案”判决后口服避孕药和紧急避孕药的使用情况。

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620.

Contraception Usage and Workforce Trends Through 2022.截至2022年的避孕措施使用情况及劳动力趋势。

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e246044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6044.

Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.多布斯诉杰克逊案对患者和医疗保健提供者的公共卫生和临床影响：范围综述。

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验