• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤患者分诊不足。

Undertriage of Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

机构信息

Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Froedtert Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2023 Oct;89(10):4129-4134. doi: 10.1177/00031348231177939. Epub 2023 May 31.

DOI:10.1177/00031348231177939
PMID:37259503
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) delineates trauma team activation (TTA) criteria to identify seriously injured trauma patients in the field. Patients are deemed to be severely undertriaged (SU), placing them at risk for adverse outcomes, when they do not meet TTA criteria but nonetheless sustain significant injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥25).

OBJECTIVES

Delineate patient demographics, injuries, and outcomes after SU.

PARTICIPANTS

Trauma patients presenting to our ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center with ISS ≥25 were included (11/2015-03/2022). Transfers and private vehicle transports were excluded. Patients were dichotomized and compared by trauma arrival level: TTA (Appropriately Triaged, AT) vs routine consults (SU).

RESULTS

Study criteria were satisfied by 1653 patients: 1375 (83%) AT and 278 (17%) SU. Severely undertriaged patients were older than AT patients (47 vs 36 years, P < .001). Severely undertriaged occurred almost exclusively following blunt trauma (96% vs 71%, P < .001). Injury Severity Score was lower following SU than AT (29 vs 32, P < .001). The most common severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score [AIS] ≥3) among the SU group were in the Chest (n = 179, 64%). Severely undertriaged patients necessitated emergent intubation (n = 34, 12%), surgery (n = 59, 21%), and angioembolization (n = 22, 8%) at high rates. Severely undertriaged mortality was n = 40, 14%.

CONCLUSION

Severely undertriaged occurred among a substantial proportion of ISS ≥25 patients, predominately following blunt trauma. Severe chest injuries were most likely to evade capture. Rates of intubation, emergent intervention, and in-hospital mortality were high after SU. Efforts should be made to identify such patients in the field as they may benefit from TTA.

摘要

简介

美国外科医师学院 (ACS) 制定了创伤救治团队激活 (TTA) 标准,以在现场识别严重受伤的创伤患者。如果患者不符合 TTA 标准,但仍遭受严重损伤(损伤严重程度评分 [ISS] ≥25),则认为他们被严重低分诊(SU),这使他们面临不良结局的风险。

目的

描述 SU 后患者的人口统计学、损伤和结局。

参与者

本研究纳入了在我们经 ACS 认证的 1 级创伤中心就诊、ISS ≥25 的创伤患者(2015 年 11 月至 2022 年 3 月)。排除了转院和私人车辆转运的患者。根据创伤到达级别将患者分为两组并进行比较:TTA(适当分诊,AT)与常规会诊(SU)。

结果

1653 名患者符合研究标准:1375 名(83%)为 AT,278 名(17%)为 SU。严重低分诊患者比 AT 患者年龄更大(47 岁比 36 岁,P <.001)。严重低分诊几乎完全发生在钝性创伤后(96%比 71%,P <.001)。SU 患者的损伤严重程度评分低于 AT(29 比 32,P <.001)。SU 组中最常见的严重损伤(损伤严重程度评分 [AIS] ≥3)为胸部损伤(179 例,64%)。严重低分诊患者需要紧急插管(n = 34,12%)、手术(n = 59,21%)和血管栓塞(n = 22,8%)的比例很高。严重低分诊患者的死亡率为 n = 40,14%。

结论

ISS ≥25 的患者中,相当一部分存在严重低分诊,主要发生在钝性创伤后。严重的胸部损伤最有可能被遗漏。SU 后患者的插管、紧急干预和住院死亡率较高。应努力在现场识别此类患者,因为他们可能受益于 TTA。

相似文献

1
Undertriage of Severely Injured Trauma Patients.严重创伤患者分诊不足。
Am Surg. 2023 Oct;89(10):4129-4134. doi: 10.1177/00031348231177939. Epub 2023 May 31.
2
Undertriaged trauma patients: Who are we missing?未充分评估的创伤患者:我们遗漏了谁?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):865-869. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002393.
3
Undertriage Despite Use of Geriatric-Specific Trauma Team Activation Guidelines : Who Are We Missing?尽管使用了老年创伤团队激活指南,但仍存在分诊不足的情况:我们漏掉了哪些人?
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):419-426. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951450. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Noncompliance with American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommended criteria for full trauma team activation is associated with undertriage deaths.不符合美国外科医师学会创伤委员会推荐的充分创伤小组激活标准与分诊不足死亡有关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):287-294. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001745.
5
Attempting to validate the overtriage/undertriage matrix at a Level I trauma center.试图在一级创伤中心验证过度分诊/分诊不足矩阵。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Dec;83(6):1173-1178. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001623.
6
Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines.引入创伤团队激活指南后,对送往创伤中心的患者进行现场分诊的精确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Jan 9;17:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-1.
7
Using a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to decrease undertriage and overtriage of pediatric trauma patients.采用多学科且基于证据的方法,以减少儿科创伤患者的分诊不足和过度分诊情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Outcome assessment of blunt trauma patients who are undertriaged.钝性创伤患者分诊不足的结局评估。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.004.
9
Undertriage of Geriatric Trauma Patients in Florida.佛罗里达州老年创伤患者的分诊不足。
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
Evaluating the ability of a trauma team activation tool to identify severe injury: a multicentre cohort study.评估创伤团队激活工具识别严重损伤的能力:一项多中心队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 10;26(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0533-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Trauma and Intensive Care (ERATIC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and International Association for Trauma Surgery and Intensive Care (IATSIC) Society Recommendations: Part 3: Trauma Ethics and Systems Aspects.创伤与重症监护强化康复指南(ERATIC):外科手术强化康复(ERAS)与国际创伤外科与重症监护协会(IATSIC)学会建议:第3部分:创伤伦理与系统方面
World J Surg. 2025 Aug;49(8):2055-2065. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70003. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
Exploring patient and system factors impacting undertriage of injured patients meeting national field triage guideline criteria.探索影响符合国家现场分诊指南标准的受伤患者分诊不足的患者和系统因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Apr 1;98(4):605-613. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004407. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Prospective validation of a hospital triage predictive model to decrease undertriage: an EAST multicenter study.一种用于减少分诊不足的医院分诊预测模型的前瞻性验证:一项东部地区多中心研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 May 2;9(1):e001280. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001280. eCollection 2024.