Glazer H S, Niemeyer J H, Balfe D M, Hayden R E, Emami B, Devineni V R, Levitt R G, Aronberg D J, Ward M P, Lee J K
Radiology. 1986 Aug;160(2):349-54. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.2.3726112.
Thirty-three patients who had undergone prior surgery and/or radiation therapy for malignant neoplasms of the neck were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Twenty-seven of these patients were also evaluated with computed tomography (CT). Ten patients were healthy posttreatment volunteers, and 23 had documented tumor recurrence. MR images better demonstrated normal muscular landmarks, especially in patients with obliterated fat planes. Areas of posttreatment fibrosis or scarring were low in signal intensity with all MR pulse sequences. However, in three patients, high signal intensity from postradiation edema of the supraglottic area mimicked neoplasm. In patients with recurrent tumor, MR imaging was superior to CT in defining the relationship of tumor and muscle and in demonstrating vascular anatomy when no intravenous contrast material was given during the CT examination. In two patients tumor and fibrosis were separated on MR images because of signal intensity differences. CT scans, however, showed adjacent bone and cartilage anatomy better. Our data indicate that an MR examination may be helpful in patients in whom CT is indeterminate either because of anatomical distortion or suboptimal demonstration of vascular anatomy.
对33例曾因颈部恶性肿瘤接受过手术和/或放射治疗的患者进行了磁共振(MR)成像研究。其中27例患者还接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)评估。10例患者为治疗后健康志愿者,23例有肿瘤复发记录。MR图像能更好地显示正常肌肉标志,尤其是在脂肪平面消失的患者中。所有MR脉冲序列显示,治疗后纤维化或瘢痕区域信号强度较低。然而,3例患者声门上区放疗后水肿的高信号强度类似肿瘤。在复发肿瘤患者中,当CT检查未给予静脉造影剂时,MR成像在确定肿瘤与肌肉的关系以及显示血管解剖结构方面优于CT。在2例患者中,由于信号强度差异,肿瘤和纤维化在MR图像上得以区分。然而,CT扫描能更好地显示相邻骨骼和软骨的解剖结构。我们的数据表明,对于因解剖结构扭曲或血管解剖显示不佳而导致CT检查结果不确定的患者,MR检查可能会有所帮助。