Lawrenz Joshua M, Vega Jose F, George Jaiben, Curtis Gannon L, Gordon Jaymeson, Maggiotto Amanda, Tullio Katherine, Shepard Dale R, Reith John D, Schwartz Herbert S, Nystrom Lukas M, Mesko Nathan W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Sarcoma. 2023 May 23;2023:9022770. doi: 10.1155/2023/9022770. eCollection 2023.
Time to treatment initiation (TTI) is a quality metric in cancer care. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of TTI data from a single cancer center registry that reports to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for sarcoma diagnoses.
A retrospective analysis of a single Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited cancer center's tumor registry between 2006 and 2016 identified 402 patients who underwent treatment of a musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcoma and had TTI data available. Registry-reported TTI was extracted from the tumor registry. Effective TTI was manually calculated by medical record review as the number of days from the date of tissue diagnosis to initiation of first effective treatment. Effective treatment was defined as oncologic surgical excision or initiation of radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Registry-reported TTI and effective TTI values were compared for concordance in all patients.
In the entire cohort, 25% (99/402) of patients had TTI data discordance, all related to surgical treatment definition. For patients with a registry-reported value of TTI = 0 days, 74% (87/118) had a diagnostic surgical procedure coded as their first treatment event, with 73 unplanned incomplete excision procedures and 14 incisional biopsies. In these patients, effective TTI was on average 59 days ( < 0.001). For patients with a registry-reported value of TTI >0 days, only 4% (12/284) had discordant TTI values.
Nearly three-fourths of patients with a registry-reported value of TTI = 0 days in a large, CoC-accredited cancer center registry had a diagnostic procedure coded as their first treatment event, though their effective treatment had not yet started. These data suggest that TTI is likely longer than what is reported to the NCDB. Redefinition of what constitutes surgical treatment should be considered to improve the accuracy of data used in measuring TTI in sarcoma.
治疗开始时间(TTI)是癌症护理中的一项质量指标。本研究的目的是确定来自向国家癌症数据库(NCDB)报告肉瘤诊断情况的单一癌症中心登记处的TTI数据的准确性。
对一家获得癌症委员会(CoC)认证的单一癌症中心2006年至2016年期间的肿瘤登记处进行回顾性分析,确定了402例接受肌肉骨骼软组织肉瘤治疗且有TTI数据的患者。登记处报告的TTI从肿瘤登记处提取。通过病历审查手动计算有效TTI,即从组织诊断日期到首次有效治疗开始的天数。有效治疗定义为肿瘤外科切除或开始放疗或化疗。比较所有患者登记处报告的TTI和有效TTI值的一致性。
在整个队列中,25%(99/402)的患者TTI数据不一致,均与手术治疗定义有关。对于登记处报告的TTI值=0天的患者,74%(87/118)的诊断性手术程序被编码为其首次治疗事件,其中73例为计划外不完全切除程序,14例为切开活检。在这些患者中,有效TTI平均为59天(P<0.001)。对于登记处报告的TTI值>0天的患者,只有4%(12/284)的TTI值不一致。
在一个大型的、获得CoC认证的癌症中心登记处,近四分之三登记处报告的TTI值=0天的患者,其诊断程序被编码为首次治疗事件,尽管他们的有效治疗尚未开始。这些数据表明,TTI可能比报告给NCDB的时间更长。应考虑重新定义手术治疗的构成,以提高用于测量肉瘤TTI的数据的准确性。