Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oecologia. 2023 Jun;202(2):261-273. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
Both abiotic and biotic conditions may be important for biodiversity. However, their relative importance may vary among different diversity dimensions as well as across spatial scales. Spiders (Araneae) offer an ecologically relevant system for evaluating variation in the relative strength abiotic and biotic biodiversity regulation. We quantified the relative importance of abiotic and biotic conditions for three diversity dimensions of spider communities quantified across two spatial scales. Spiders were surveyed along elevation gradients in northern Sweden. We focused our analysis on geomorphological and climatic conditions as well as vegetation characteristics, and quantified the relative importance of these conditions for the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spider communities sampled across one intermediate (500 m) and one local (25 m) scale. There were stronger relationships among diversity dimensions at the local than the intermediate scale. There were also variation in the relative influence of abiotic and biotic conditions among diversity dimensions, but this variation was not consistent across spatial scales. Across both spatial scales, vegetation was related to all diversity dimensions whereas climate was important for phylogenetic and functional diversity. Our study does not fully support stronger abiotic regulation at coarser scales, and conversely stronger abiotic regulation at more local scales. Instead, our results indicate that community assembly is shaped by interactions between abiotic constrains in species distributions and biotic conditions, and that such interactions may be both scale and context dependent.
非生物和生物条件都可能对生物多样性很重要。然而,它们的相对重要性可能因不同的多样性维度以及空间尺度而异。蜘蛛(Araneae)为评估生物多样性调节中生物和非生物条件的相对强度变化提供了一个生态相关的系统。我们量化了蜘蛛群落三个多样性维度的非生物和生物条件的相对重要性,这些多样性维度是在两个空间尺度上进行量化的。蜘蛛沿着瑞典北部的海拔梯度进行了调查。我们的分析集中在地貌和气候条件以及植被特征上,并量化了这些条件对在一个中间(500 米)和一个局部(25 米)尺度上采样的蜘蛛群落的分类学、系统发育和功能多样性的相对重要性。在局部尺度上,多样性维度之间的关系比在中间尺度上更强。非生物和生物条件对多样性维度的相对影响也存在差异,但这种差异在空间尺度上并不一致。在两个空间尺度上,植被与所有多样性维度都有关,而气候对系统发育和功能多样性很重要。我们的研究结果并不完全支持在较粗的尺度上非生物调节更强,而是相反,在更局部的尺度上非生物调节更强。相反,我们的结果表明,群落组装受到物种分布的生物限制和生物条件之间相互作用的影响,并且这种相互作用可能是尺度和上下文相关的。