Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Blood & Marrow Transplantation Center, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Department of Hematology, Rui Jin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Clinical Research Center, Feng Lin International Centre, Shanghai, China.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Aug;29(8):512.e1-512.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 30.
Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with standard myeloablative conditioning regimens such as fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (Bu) remains a major concern in patients with myeloid malignancies. A low relapse rate has been reported when thiotepa or melphalan (Mel) is added to Flu-Bu, but at a possible increased risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Here we evaluated the outcomes of 100 patients (70 with acute myeloid leukemia, 23 with myelodysplastic syndrome, 4 with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and 3 with granulocytic sarcoma) who underwent their first allo-HSCT after a moderate-dose FBM conditioning regimen consisting of Flu 150 mg/m, Bu 6.4 mg/kg, and Mel 140 mg/m (n = 69), with Mel 100 mg/m for patients age >55 years and/or with a Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) ≥3 (n = 31). Donors were HLA-matched siblings (n = 19), matched unrelated donors (n = 4), and haploidentical donors (n = 77). The majority of patients (88%) had an intermediate or high Disease Risk Index. Out of 96 evaluable patients, 94 achieved neutrophil engraftment and had full donor chimerism on day +30 post-transplantation. After a median follow-up of 468 days (range, 55 to 1039 days), only 4 patients relapsed, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 5.3% ± 3.6%. The 100-day and 2-year NRM were 6.8% ± 4.4% and 12.3% ± 3.6%, respectively. At the last follow-up, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 82.4% ± 4.2% and 80.3% ± 6.0%, respectively. Comparing the transplantation outcomes between patients receiving Mel 100 mg/m and those receiving Mel 140 mg/m, showed no significant differences in NRM and CIR between the 2 groups and similar 2-year DFS and OS in the 2 groups, although the Mel 100 group had a higher median age (58 years versus 42 years; P < .001) and a higher percentage of patients with an HCT-CI ≥3 (P = .005). In the total cohort, the sole independent factor associated with transplantation outcomes was HCT-CI ≥3, which correlated with higher NRM and inferior DFS and OS. Our study suggests that moderate-intensity FBM conditioning is feasible for patients with myeloid malignancies, with a low relapse rate without increased NRM. A lower Mel dose of 100 mg/m maintained the low risk of relapse without excess NRM in older adults. However, the FBM regimen should be used with caution in patients with high-risk HCT-CI (≥3).
异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后复发仍是伴有髓系恶性肿瘤患者的主要关注点,采用标准的清髓性预处理方案,如氟达拉滨(Flu)和白消安(Bu)。然而,当硫替哌或美法仑(Mel)加入 Flu-Bu 时,复发率较低,但非复发死亡率(NRM)可能增加。在此,我们评估了 100 例患者(70 例急性髓系白血病,23 例骨髓增生异常综合征,4 例慢性粒单核细胞白血病,3 例粒细胞肉瘤)的移植结果,他们在接受中等剂量 FBM 预处理方案(Flu 150mg/m2、Bu 6.4mg/kg 和 Mel 140mg/m2,n=69)后接受了首次 allo-HSCT,年龄>55 岁或伴有造血细胞移植合并症指数(HCT-CI)≥3 患者接受 Mel 100mg/m2 预处理(n=31)。供者为 HLA 匹配的同胞(n=19)、匹配的无关供者(n=4)和单倍体相合供者(n=77)。大多数患者(88%)为中危或高危疾病风险指数。96 例可评估患者中,94 例获得中性粒细胞植入,并在移植后第 30 天达到完全供者嵌合。中位随访 468 天(范围 55-1039 天)后,仅 4 例患者复发,2 年累积复发率(CIR)为 5.3%±3.6%。100 天和 2 年 NRM 分别为 6.8%±4.4%和 12.3%±3.6%。最后一次随访时,2 年无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)分别为 82.4%±4.2%和 80.3%±6.0%。比较接受 Mel 100mg/m 和接受 Mel 140mg/m 的患者移植结果,两组间 NRM 和 CIR 无显著差异,两组 2 年 DFS 和 OS 相似,尽管 Mel 100 组的中位年龄较高(58 岁比 42 岁;P<.001)和 HCT-CI≥3 的患者比例较高(P=.005)。在总队列中,唯一与移植结果相关的独立因素是 HCT-CI≥3,这与较高的 NRM 和较差的 DFS 和 OS 相关。我们的研究表明,中等强度的 FBM 预处理方案对于伴有髓系恶性肿瘤的患者是可行的,复发率低,NRM 无增加。对于老年患者,较低剂量的 Mel(100mg/m)维持了低复发率,无额外的 NRM。然而,在伴有高危 HCT-CI(≥3)的患者中应谨慎使用 FBM 方案。