• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟达拉滨、白消安和马法兰预处理方案用于成年髓系恶性肿瘤患者异基因造血干细胞移植:一项多中心回顾性研究

Fludarabine, busulfan, and melphalan conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with myeloid malignancies: A multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Jiang Jieling, Li Xiaofan, Wu Dong, Lu Quanyi, Miao Kourong, Wang Houcai, Li Xiaoping, Chen Yingnian, Zhou Shiyuan, Zhou Yali, Liao Guiping, Jiang Chuanhe, Yuan Xiaohong, Zhao Youshan, Chang Chunkang, Chen Jie, Zhu Han, Ma Ruye, Li Nainong, Yin Xiaolin, Wu Xiaojin, Wang Sanbin, Wang Chun, Hu Jiong

机构信息

Department of Hematology. Shanghai Institute of Hematology Blood & Marrow Transplantation Center Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital Shanghai China.

Department of Hematology Fujian Medical University Union Hospital Fuzhou China.

出版信息

EJHaem. 2024 Jul 8;5(4):757-767. doi: 10.1002/jha2.947. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/jha2.947
PMID:39157627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11327722/
Abstract

Relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure in patients with myeloid malignancies even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We observed a particularly low incidence of relapse in patients prepared with fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan in our previous study and this multicenter retrospective analysis aimed to confirm the feasibility of the regimen and to identify the potential prognostic factors. This study was performed using registry data from adults patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent their first allo-HSCT following fludarabine(≥100 mg/m), busulfan (≥3.2 mg/kg) and melphalan (≥100 mg/m) based conditioning at nine transplantation centers in China between Jan. 2020 and Mar. 2022. A total of 221 consecutive patients (AML  = 171, MDS-IB-1 or 2  = 44, CMML  = 6) with median age of 46 were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 507 days for survivors. The 2-year NRM, CIR, OS and DFS were 10.6% ± 2.2%, 14.8% ± 3.3%, 79.4% ± 3.7% and 74.6% ± 3.7%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, high HCT-CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 2.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 7.90;  = 0.030] and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95%CI, 1.15 to 5.16;  = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.13 to 4.02;  = 0.020). AML diagnosis and positive measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplantation were predictors for higher CIR (HR = 7.92, 95%CI 1.05-60.03,  = 0.045; HR = 3.64, 95%CI 1.40-9.44,  = 0.008; respectively), while post-transplantation cyclophosphamide based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was associated with lower CIR (HR = 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.54,  = 0.001). The intensity of conditioning regimen did not impact CIR, NRM, DFS and OS. These results supported that double alkylating agents of busulfan and melphalan based conditioning regimens were associated with low relapse rate and acceptable NRM in adult patients with myeloid malignancies. The optimal dose remained to be confirmed by further prospective studies.

摘要

即使在异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后,复发仍然是髓系恶性肿瘤患者治疗失败的主要原因。在我们之前的研究中,我们观察到接受氟达拉滨、白消安和马法兰预处理的患者复发率特别低,这项多中心回顾性分析旨在确认该方案的可行性,并确定潜在的预后因素。本研究使用了2020年1月至2022年3月期间在中国9个移植中心接受首次allo-HSCT的成年髓系恶性肿瘤患者的登记数据。共有221例连续患者(急性髓系白血病[AML]=171例,骨髓增生异常综合征-国际预后积分系统[MDS-IPSS]-1或2级=44例,慢性粒-单核细胞白血病[CMML]=6例)入组本研究,中位年龄为46岁。幸存者的中位随访时间为507天。2年的非复发死亡率(NRM)、复发率(CIR)及总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为10.6%±2.2%、14.8%±3.3%、79.4%±3.7%和74.6%±3.7%。在多变量分析中,高造血细胞移植合并症指数(HCT-CI)(≥3)是NRM升高的唯一独立因素[风险比(HR),2.96;95%置信区间(CI),1.11至7.90;P=0.030],东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分≥2是OS(HR,2.43;95%CI,1.15至5.16;P=0.020)和DFS(HR,2.12;95%CI,1.13至4.02;P=0.020)较差的唯一独立因素。AML诊断和移植时可测量残留病(MRD)阳性是CIR升高的预测因素(HR=7.92,95%CI 1.05-60.03,P=0.045;HR=3.64,95%CI 1.40-9.44,P=0.008;分别),而移植后基于环磷酰胺预防移植物抗宿主病与较低的CIR相关(HR=0.24,95%CI 0.11-0.54,P=0.001)。预处理方案的强度不影响CIR、NRM、DFS和OS。这些结果支持,基于白消安和马法兰的双烷化剂预处理方案与成年髓系恶性肿瘤患者的低复发率和可接受的NRM相关。最佳剂量仍有待进一步的前瞻性研究来证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/11327722/6b639beb674e/JHA2-5-757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/11327722/659c265a3517/JHA2-5-757-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/11327722/6b639beb674e/JHA2-5-757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/11327722/659c265a3517/JHA2-5-757-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c008/11327722/6b639beb674e/JHA2-5-757-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Fludarabine, busulfan, and melphalan conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with myeloid malignancies: A multicenter retrospective study.氟达拉滨、白消安和马法兰预处理方案用于成年髓系恶性肿瘤患者异基因造血干细胞移植:一项多中心回顾性研究
EJHaem. 2024 Jul 8;5(4):757-767. doi: 10.1002/jha2.947. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Low Incidence of Relapse with a Moderate Conditioning Regimen of Fludarabine, Busulfan, and Melphalan for Patients with Myeloid Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis of 100 Patients.氟达拉滨、白消安和马法兰中度预处理方案治疗髓系恶性肿瘤患者的复发率低:单中心 100 例患者分析。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Aug;29(8):512.e1-512.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 30.
3
Transplantation Outcomes of Myelofibrosis with Busulfan and Fludarabine Myeloablative Conditioning.骨髓纤维化伴白消安和氟达拉滨清除性预处理的移植结局。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Dec;29(12):770.e1-770.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
4
Impact on Outcome of Minimal Residual Disease after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Fludarabine, Amsacrine, and Cytosine Arabinoside-Busulfan Conditioning: A Retrospective Monocentric Study.氟达拉滨、安吖啶和阿糖胞苷-白消安预处理的造血干细胞移植后微小残留病对预后的影响:一项回顾性单中心研究
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jan;29(1):38.e1-38.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning With Fludarabine/Busulfan for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.氟达拉滨/白消安与减低强度预处理方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征:倾向评分匹配分析。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jun;28(6):323.e1-323.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
6
Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan versus fludarabine and melphalan for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.氟达拉滨与白消安的减低剂量预处理方案对比氟达拉滨与美法仑用于急性髓细胞白血病患者:欧洲血液与骨髓移植组急性白血病工作组的报告
Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):1048-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29163. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Comparison of Conditioning with Fludarabine/Busulfan and Fludarabine/Melphalan in Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients 50 Years or Older.50 岁及以上异基因移植受者中氟达拉滨/白消安与氟达拉滨/马法兰预处理方案的比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Dec;23(12):2079-2087. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Reduced-Intensity Compared to Nonmyeloablative Conditioning in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.在接受异基因造血干细胞移植的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,与非清髓性预处理相比,强度降低的预处理。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Jan;30(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.09.022. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
9
Comparison of fludarabine-based conditioning regimens in adult cord blood transplantation for myeloid malignancy: A retrospective, registry-based study.成人亲缘血造血干细胞移植中基于氟达拉滨的预处理方案比较:一项回顾性、基于注册库的研究。
Am J Hematol. 2024 Feb;99(2):236-244. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27172. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
10
Busulfan, fludarabine, and melphalan are effective conditioning for pediatric and young adult patients with myeloid malignancies underdoing matched sibling or alternative donor transplantation.马利兰、氟达拉滨和苯丙氨酸氮芥联合方案作为预处理方案,可使接受同胞或非血缘供者移植的儿童及青年髓系恶性肿瘤患者获得良好疗效。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Feb;70(2):e30102. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30102. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Low Incidence of Relapse with a Moderate Conditioning Regimen of Fludarabine, Busulfan, and Melphalan for Patients with Myeloid Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis of 100 Patients.氟达拉滨、白消安和马法兰中度预处理方案治疗髓系恶性肿瘤患者的复发率低:单中心 100 例患者分析。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Aug;29(8):512.e1-512.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Prognostic Value of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients with AML Undergoing HSCT: A Multicenter Study.接受造血干细胞移植的急性髓系白血病患者中可测量残留病的预后价值:一项多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;15(5):1609. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051609.
3
Comparison of fludarabine-melphalan and fludarabine-treosulfan as conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation-a registry study on behalf of the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party.
氟达拉滨-马法兰与氟达拉滨-噻替哌作为异基因造血细胞移植预处理方案的比较:EBMT 急性白血病工作组的注册研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Aug;57(8):1269-1276. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01646-1. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Double alkylators based conditioning reduced the relapse rate after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in adult patients with myeloid malignancies: a single arm phase II study.基于双烷化剂的预处理降低了成年髓系恶性肿瘤患者异基因外周血干细胞移植后的复发率:一项单臂II期研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 May;57(5):843-845. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01643-4. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Randomized Phase III BMT CTN Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Interventions in Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.随机 III 期 BMT CTN 试验:在血液恶性肿瘤的清髓性造血细胞移植中,钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂免费的慢性移植物抗宿主病干预。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 1;40(4):356-368. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02293. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
Prognostic value of measurable residual disease monitoring by next-generation sequencing before and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.异基因造血细胞移植前后应用下一代测序技术检测可测量残留病对急性髓系白血病的预后价值。
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Jun 4;11(6):109. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00500-9.
7
Effect of the Thiotepa Dose in the TBF Conditioning Regimen in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Remission: A Report From the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party.在完全缓解的急性髓系白血病患者中进行异基因造血干细胞移植时 TBF 预处理方案中噻替哌剂量的影响:来自 EBMT 急性白血病工作组的报告。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 May;20(5):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients.当前时代重新定义和衡量移植预处理强度:一项针对急性髓系白血病患者的研究
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jun;55(6):1114-1125. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0803-y. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplants in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prepared with Busulfan and Fludarabine (BUFLU) or Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine (TBF): A Retrospective Study.异基因造血干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)患者:采用白消安和氟达拉滨(BUFLU)或噻替哌、白消安和氟达拉滨(TBF)预处理方案的回顾性研究。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Apr;26(4):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.725. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
Impact of Conditioning Intensity of Allogeneic Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Genomic Evidence of Residual Disease.有残留疾病基因组证据的急性髓细胞性白血病异体移植的条件强度的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 20;38(12):1273-1283. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03011. Epub 2019 Dec 20.