School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA,Australia.
Department of Physical Education, Qatar University, Doha,Qatar.
Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2023 Jun 1;41(1):33-50. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2022-0168. Print 2024 Jan 1.
This research provides a review of seated shot put alongside new data from the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games with the aim to understand the latest trends in equipment within a recently established rule set and how key equipment variables may impact performance for athletes in different classifications. First, a review of the literature found that the throwing pole is a key equipment aid that is not well understood, in part due to limitations in testing design. New data from the 2020 Paralympic Games showed inconsistent trends for the use of the throwing pole among athletes, particularly in transitionary classes (F33-34 and F54-55). A two-way analysis of variance found a main effect of classification on performance (p < .001), as well as an interaction effect between pole use and classification on performance (p < .05). Notably, pole users are seen to perform better than non-pole users in Class F32 (p < .05).
本研究回顾了坐式推铅球,并结合 2020 年东京残奥会的新数据,旨在了解最近建立的规则体系内设备的最新趋势,以及关键设备变量如何影响不同级别运动员的表现。首先,文献回顾发现,推铅球杆是一种关键的设备辅助工具,但并未被很好地理解,部分原因是测试设计的局限性。2020 年残奥会的新数据显示,运动员对推铅球杆的使用存在不一致的趋势,特别是在过渡性级别(F33-34 和 F54-55)。方差分析发现,分类对表现有主要影响(p<0.001),以及杆的使用和分类对表现的交互作用(p<0.05)。值得注意的是,在 F32 级别,使用推铅球杆的运动员比不使用的表现要好(p<0.05)。