Medical Oncology Department, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Program in Solid Tumours, CIMA, Pamplona, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain.
Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG Foundation), NYU Langone, Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Aug;189:112908. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.024. Epub 2023 May 3.
To report updated long-term efficacy and safety from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016).
Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with complete or partial response (CR or PR) to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received niraparib or placebo once daily (2:1 ratio). Stratification factors were best response to first-line chemotherapy regimen (CR/PR), receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status (deficient [HRd]/proficient [HRp] or not determined). Updated (ad hoc) progression-free survival (PFS) data (as of November 17, 2021) by investigator assessment (INV) are reported.
In 733 randomised patients (niraparib, 487; placebo, 246), median PFS follow-up was 3.5years. Median INV-PFS was 24.5 versus 11.2months (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.68) in the HRd population and 13.8 versus 8.2months (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79) in the overall population for niraparib and placebo, respectively. In the HRp population, median INV-PFS was 8.4 versus 5.4months (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87), respectively. Results were concordant with the primary analysis. Niraparib-treated patients were more likely to be free of progression or death at 4years than placebo-treated patients (HRd, 38% versus 17%; overall, 24% versus 14%). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in niraparib patients were thrombocytopenia (39.7%), anaemia (31.6%), and neutropenia (21.3%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukaemia incidence rate (1.2%) was the same for niraparib- and placebo-treated patients. Overall survival remained immature.
Niraparib maintained clinically significant improvements in PFS with 3.5years of follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of progression irrespective of HRD status. No new safety signals were identified.
报告来自双盲、安慰剂对照、III 期 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 研究(NCT02655016)的更新的长期疗效和安全性。
接受过一线含铂化疗并达到完全或部分缓解(CR 或 PR)的新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者接受尼拉帕利或安慰剂每日一次(2:1 比例)治疗。分层因素为一线化疗方案的最佳反应(CR/PR)、是否接受新辅助化疗(是/否)和同源重组缺陷(HRD)状态(缺陷[HRd]/有功能[HRp]或未确定)。研究者评估的更新(临时)无进展生存期(PFS)数据(截至 2021 年 11 月 17 日)。
在 733 名随机患者(尼拉帕利,487 例;安慰剂,246 例)中,中位 PFS 随访时间为 3.5 年。在 HRd 人群中,尼拉帕利组和安慰剂组的中位 INV-PFS 分别为 24.5 个月和 11.2 个月(风险比,0.52;95%置信区间 [CI],0.40-0.68),在总体人群中分别为 13.8 个月和 8.2 个月(风险比,0.66;95% CI,0.56-0.79)。在 HRp 人群中,尼拉帕利组和安慰剂组的中位 INV-PFS 分别为 8.4 个月和 5.4 个月(风险比,0.65;95% CI,0.49-0.87)。结果与主要分析一致。与安慰剂组相比,尼拉帕利治疗的患者在 4 年时无进展或死亡的可能性更高(HRd,38% 比 17%;总体,24% 比 14%)。尼拉帕利治疗患者中最常见的 3 级及以上治疗相关不良事件为血小板减少症(39.7%)、贫血(31.6%)和中性粒细胞减少症(21.3%)。尼拉帕利组和安慰剂组骨髓增生异常综合征/急性髓系白血病的发生率(1.2%)相同。总生存仍不成熟。
在新诊断的晚期卵巢癌患者中,无论 HRD 状态如何,尼拉帕利在 3.5 年的随访中均保持了显著的 PFS 改善,具有临床意义。未发现新的安全性信号。