GOG Foundation, Philadelphia; Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, West Palm Beach, USA.
Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI-CERCA), Girona University, Girona; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer ginecológicO (GEICO), Madrid, Spain.
Ann Oncol. 2024 Nov;35(11):981-992. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2241. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
The phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported.
Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical [overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) population]. Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cut-off date, 8 April 2024).
The median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio was 1.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23; P = 0.8834] for niraparib (n = 487) versus placebo (n = 246). In the HRd (n = 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n = 249) populations, the OS hazard ratios were 0.95 (95% CI 0.70-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed.
In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were two times as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile.
PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 三期临床试验达到了主要终点。尼拉帕利一线维持治疗显著延长了新诊断为晚期卵巢癌患者的无进展生存期(PFS),这些患者对一线含铂化疗有反应,无论同源重组缺陷(HRD)状态如何。报告最终的总生存期(OS)结果。
患者按 2:1 随机分配至尼拉帕利或安慰剂组,分层因素为一线治疗反应、新辅助化疗的使用情况和肿瘤 HRD 状态。达到 60%目标成熟度后,采用分层对数秩检验评估 OS,使用随机化分层因素进行分层,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行总结。OS 检验是分层的(首先是总体人群,然后是同源重组缺陷(HRd)人群)。评估了其他次要终点和长期安全性;还对研究者评估的 PFS 进行了更新的、特别的分析(截止日期为 2024 年 8 月 8 日)。
中位随访时间为 73.9 个月。在总体人群中,尼拉帕利(n=487)与安慰剂(n=246)的 OS 风险比为 1.01(95%CI 0.84-1.23;P=0.8834)。在 HRd(n=373)和同源重组功能正常(HRp)人群(n=249)中,OS 风险比分别为 0.95(95%CI 0.70-1.29)和 0.93(95%CI 0.69-1.26)。在总体人群和 HRd 人群中,分别有 11.7%和 15.8%的尼拉帕利患者和 37.8%和 48.4%的安慰剂患者随后接受了多聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂治疗。在总体人群(尼拉帕利 22%,安慰剂 12%)和 HRd 人群(尼拉帕利 35%,安慰剂 16%)中,尼拉帕利组的 5 年 PFS 率均有数值优势。骨髓增生异常综合征/急性髓系白血病的发生率低于 2.5%(尼拉帕利 2.3%,安慰剂 1.6%)。未观察到新的安全性信号。
在复发风险高的新诊断为晚期卵巢癌的患者中,两组间的 OS 无差异。在 HRd 人群中,与安慰剂相比,尼拉帕利治疗的患者在 5 年时无进展生存的可能性是安慰剂的两倍。长期安全性与尼拉帕利既定的安全性特征一致。