Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):8251-8262. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09783-x. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
To assess the prognostic significance of automatically quantified interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) according to the definition by the Fleischner Society in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for NSCLC between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Preoperative CT scans were analyzed using the commercially available deep-learning-based automated quantification software for ILA. According to quantified results and the definition by the Fleischner Society and multidisciplinary discussion, patients were divided into normal, ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups.
Of the 1524 patients, 87 (5.7%) and 20 (1.3%) patients had ILA and ILD, respectively. Both ILA (HR, 1.81; 95% CI: 1.25-2.61; p = .002) and ILD (HR, 5.26; 95% CI: 2.99-9.24; p < .001) groups had poor recurrence-free survival (RFS). Overall survival (OS) decreased (HR 2.13 [95% CI: 1.27-3.58; p = .004] for the ILA group and 7.20 [95% CI: 3.80-13.62, p < .001] for the ILD group) as the disease severity increased. Both quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components were associated with poor RFS (HR, 1.57; 95% CI: 1.12-2.21; p = .009; and HR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.23; p = .03) and OS (HR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06-2.37; p = .02; and HR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33; and p = .01) in normal and ILA groups.
The automated CT quantification of ILA based on the definition by the Fleischner Society predicts outcomes of patients with resectable lung cancer based on the disease category and quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components.
Quantitative CT assessment of ILA provides prognostic information for lung cancer patients after surgery, which can help in considering active surveillance for recurrence, especially in those with a larger extent of quantified ILA.
• Of the 1524 patients with resectable lung cancer, 1417 (93.0%) patients were categorized as normal, 87 (5.7%) as interstitial lung abnormality (ILA), and 20 (1.3%) as interstitial lung disease (ILD). • Both ILA and ILD groups were associated with poor recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81, p = .002; HR, 5.26, p < .001, respectively) and overall survival (HR, 2.13; p = .004; HR, 7.20; p < .001). • Both quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components were associated with recurrence-free survival and overall survival in normal and ILA groups.
评估根据 Fleischner 学会定义的可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者自动量化的间质肺异常(ILA)的预后意义。
回顾性纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 NSCLC 肺叶切除术或全肺切除术的患者。使用市售的基于深度学习的自动量化 ILA 软件分析术前 CT 扫描。根据量化结果和 Fleischner 学会和多学科讨论的定义,将患者分为正常、ILA 和间质性肺病(ILD)组。
在 1524 例患者中,87 例(5.7%)和 20 例(1.3%)患者分别有 ILA 和 ILD。ILA 组(HR,1.81;95%CI:1.25-2.61;p=0.002)和 ILD 组(HR,5.26;95%CI:2.99-9.24;p<0.001)的无复发生存率(RFS)均较差。随着疾病严重程度的增加,总生存率(OS)降低(ILA 组 HR 2.13[95%CI:1.27-3.58;p=0.004],ILD 组 HR 7.20[95%CI:3.80-13.62,p<0.001])。定量纤维化和非纤维化 ILA 成分均与 RFS(HR,1.57;95%CI:1.12-2.21;p=0.009;和 HR,1.11;95%CI:1.01-1.23;p=0.03)和 OS(HR,1.59;95%CI:1.06-2.37;p=0.02;和 HR,1.17;95%CI:1.03-1.33;p=0.01)相关,在正常和 ILA 组中。
基于 Fleischner 学会定义的 CT 自动量化 ILA 可预测可切除肺癌患者的预后,其依据是疾病类别和量化的纤维化和非纤维化 ILA 成分。
ILA 的定量 CT 评估为手术后的肺癌患者提供了预后信息,这有助于考虑对复发进行主动监测,特别是在那些 ILA 范围较大的患者中。
在 1524 例可切除肺癌患者中,1417 例(93.0%)患者被归类为正常,87 例(5.7%)为间质性肺异常(ILA),20 例(1.3%)为间质性肺病(ILD)。
ILA 组和 ILD 组的无复发生存率(HR,1.81,p=0.002;HR,5.26,p<0.001)和总生存率(HR,2.13;p=0.004;HR,7.20;p<0.001)均较差。
正常和 ILA 组中,定量纤维化和非纤维化的 ILA 成分与无复发生存率和总生存率均相关。