Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Regensburg Regional Hospital for Forensic Health Psychiatry and Neurology, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Aug;165(8):2179-2187. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05624-4. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Several meta-analyses comparing the outcome of awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation procedures could not reveal significant differences concerning the postoperative improvement of motor symptoms. Only rarely information on the procedural details is provided for awake operations and how often somnolence and disorientation occurred, which might hamper the reliability of intraoperative clinical testing. The aim of our study was to investigate possible influencing factors on the occurrence of somnolence and disorientation in awake DBS procedures.
We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with Parkinson's disease having received implantation of a DBS system at our centre. Correlation analyses were performed for the duration of disease prior to surgery, number of microelectrode trajectories, AC-PC-coordinates of the planned target, UPDRS-scores, intraoperative application of sedative drugs, duration of the surgical procedure, perioperative application of apomorphine, and the preoperative L-DOPA equivalence dosage with the occurrence of intraoperative somnolence and disorientation.
Patients with intraoperative somnolence were significantly older (p=0.039). Increased duration of the DBS procedure (p=0.020), delayed start of the surgery (p=0.049), higher number of MER trajectories (p=0.041), and the patients' % UPDRS improvement (p=0.046) also correlated with the incidence of intraoperative somnolence. We identified the main contributing factor to intraoperative somnolence as the use of sedative drugs applied during skin incision and burr hole trepanation (p=0.019). Perioperatively applied apomorphine could reduce the occurrence of somnolent phases during the operation (p=0.026).
Several influencing factors were found to seemingly increase the risk of intraoperative somnolence and disorientation, while the use of sedative drugs seems to be the main contributing factor. We argue that awake DBS procedures should omit the use of sedatives for best clinical outcome. When reporting on awake DBS surgery these factors should be considered and adjusted for, to permit reliable interpretation and comparison of DBS study results.
几项比较清醒与睡眠状态下脑深部刺激术结果的荟萃分析未能显示在术后运动症状改善方面有显著差异。仅有少数清醒手术的手术细节信息和昏睡及定向障碍的发生频率被报道,这可能会影响术中临床测试的可靠性。本研究旨在探讨清醒 DBS 手术中昏睡和定向障碍发生的可能影响因素。
我们回顾性分析了在我们中心接受 DBS 系统植入的 122 例帕金森病患者。对手术前疾病持续时间、微电极轨迹数量、计划靶区的 AC-PC 坐标、UPDRS 评分、术中镇静药物的应用、手术持续时间、围手术期阿扑吗啡的应用以及术前左旋多巴等效剂量与术中昏睡和定向障碍的发生进行了相关性分析。
术中出现昏睡的患者年龄明显较大(p=0.039)。DBS 手术时间延长(p=0.020)、手术开始延迟(p=0.049)、MER 轨迹数量增加(p=0.041)和患者 UPDRS 改善百分比(p=0.046)也与术中昏睡的发生相关。我们发现术中使用镇静药物是导致昏睡的主要因素,这些药物在皮肤切口和颅骨钻孔时应用(p=0.019)。围手术期应用阿扑吗啡可减少术中昏睡期的发生(p=0.026)。
发现几个影响因素似乎增加了术中昏睡和定向障碍的风险,而镇静药物的使用似乎是主要的影响因素。我们认为,为了获得最佳的临床效果,清醒 DBS 手术应避免使用镇静剂。在报告清醒 DBS 手术时,应考虑并调整这些因素,以允许对 DBS 研究结果进行可靠的解释和比较。