Yang Xiu Hong, Bao Wen Jing, Zhang Hua, Fu Shun Kun, Jin Hui Min
Division of Nephrology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Pudong Medical Center, Gong Wei Road, Shanghai, China.
Department of Nephrology, Affiliated the Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun 2:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9.
Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly.
We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis where MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were queried to identify relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials, prospective, observational cohort, and case-control studies assessing breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality after coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in the elderly (≥ 60 years old).
Overall, 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the vaccinated group showed a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection after 28-34 (relative risk [RR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.49) and 35-60 days (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.62). There was a step-wise increase in efficacy with additional doses with the two-dose group experiencing decreased risk of breakthrough infection (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.32-0.42), hospital admissions (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.14-0.45), disease severity (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.70), and mortality (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.14-0.32) compared with those receiving one or no doses. Similarly three-dose and four-dose vaccine groups also showed a decreased risk of breakthrough infection (3-dose: RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.10-0.20; 4-dose RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.4-0.53), hospital admissions (3-dose: RR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.07-0.17; 4-dose: RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32-0.55), and all-cause mortality (3-dose: RR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.48; 4-dose: RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.84) Subgroup analysis found that protection against mortality for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups was similar by age (60-79 years: RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47-0.74; ≥ 80 years: RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98) and gender (female: RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87, male: (RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76), and comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.92) or diabetes (DM) (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89.
Our pooled results showed that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered to the elderly is effective in preventing prevent breakthrough infection, hospitalization, severity, and death. What's more, increasing number of vaccine doses is becoming increasingly effective.
鉴于老年人群对疫苗的免疫反应降低,本研究旨在评估新冠疫苗接种的效果及其对老年人突破性感染、住院和死亡率的影响。
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,检索了MEDLINE、科学网、EMBASE、临床试验.gov和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,以识别相关文献。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机试验、前瞻性观察队列和病例对照研究,评估老年人(≥60岁)接种冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗后的突破性感染、住院和死亡率。
总体而言,本荟萃分析纳入了26项研究。与未接种疫苗组相比,接种疫苗组在28-34天(相对风险[RR]=0.42,95%置信区间[CI]0.37-0.49)和35-60天时SARS-CoV-2感染风险降低。随着剂量增加,效力逐步提高,两剂组与接种一剂或未接种的组相比,突破性感染风险降低(RR=0.37,95%CI 0.32-0.42)、住院风险降低(RR=0.25,95%CI 0.14-0.45)、疾病严重程度降低(RR=0.38,95%CI 0.20-0.70)和死亡率降低(RR=0.21,95%CI 0.14-0.32)。同样,三剂和四剂疫苗组也显示突破性感染风险降低(三剂:RR=0.14,95%CI 0.10-0.20;四剂RR=0.46,95%CI 0.4-0.53)、住院风险降低(三剂:RR=0.11,95%CI 0.07-0.17;四剂:RR=0.42,95%CI 0.32-0.55)和全因死亡率降低(三剂:RR=0.10,95%CI 0.02-0.48;四剂:RR=0.48,95%CI 0.28-0.84)。亚组分析发现,接种疫苗组与未接种疫苗组相比,按年龄(60-79岁:RR=0.59;95%CI,0.47-0.74;≥80岁:RR=0.76;95%CI,0.59-0.98)、性别(女性:RR=0.66;95%CI,0.50-0.87,男性:(RR=0.58;95%CI,0.44-0.76)以及合并心血管疾病(CVD)(RR=0.69;95%CI,0.52-0.92)或糖尿病(DM)(RR=0.59;95%CI,0.39-0.89)分层后,对死亡率的保护相似。
我们的汇总结果表明,给老年人接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗可有效预防突破性感染、住院、疾病严重程度和死亡。此外,增加疫苗剂量的效果越来越显著。