Cristea Darie, Ilie Dragoș-Georgian, Constantinescu Claudia, Fîrțală Valeriu
Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, 010181 Bucharest, Romania.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;10(9):1496. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091496.
This paper presents the findings of a study aiming at an innovative typology of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. The proposed typology tries to go beyond the common sociological studies who divide the public into three categories: pro-vaxxers, anti-vaxxers, and hesitants. Our purpose is obtaining a more complex typology using cluster analysis. The article is based on a nation-wide survey conducted in Romania. The sample of the survey was statistically representative to the population of Romania and was composed of 1002 participants. A k-means algorithm for classifying cases was used to identify how the studied population structures itself when it comes to attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. We see hesitancy as an expression of concern or doubt about the value or safety of the vaccination, but also as fear or dis(trust) in the authorities, or as disinterest. We found out that the Romanian public falls into three categories regarding the attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination: the "non-fanatical" pro-vaxxers, the anti-vaxxers, and those without a clear opinion (uninterested and/or undecided). What we usually call "vaccine hesitancy" can be found, depending on motivation or type of hesitancy, in both of the last two clusters.
本文介绍了一项旨在对新冠疫苗接种态度进行创新分类研究的结果。所提出的分类法试图超越将公众分为三类的常见社会学研究:支持接种者、反对接种者和犹豫者。我们的目的是使用聚类分析获得一种更复杂的分类法。本文基于在罗马尼亚进行的一项全国性调查。该调查样本在统计学上代表了罗马尼亚人口,由1002名参与者组成。一种用于对案例进行分类的k均值算法被用来确定在新冠疫苗接种态度方面,所研究的人群是如何自我构建的。我们将犹豫视为对疫苗接种价值或安全性的担忧或怀疑的一种表现,同时也视为对当局的恐惧或不信任,或者是不感兴趣。我们发现,罗马尼亚公众在新冠疫苗接种态度方面分为三类:“非狂热”的支持接种者、反对接种者以及没有明确意见的人(不感兴趣和/或未决定)。根据犹豫的动机或类型,我们通常所说的“疫苗犹豫”可以在最后两类中找到。