Suppr超能文献

一项比较癌症成人患者外周置入中心静脉导管隧道长度的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Tunnel Lengths in Adult Patients With Cancer.

机构信息

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

出版信息

Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2023 May 18;27(3):295-304. doi: 10.1188/23.CJON.295-304.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence is insufficient on the effect of tunnel lengths on tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in adult patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to explore whether there is an optimal PICC tunnel length to reduce the risk of PICC-related complications. The secondary objective was to compare patients' pain and comfort levels during catheter placement with different tunnel lengths.

METHODS

Two hundred patients were randomly assigned to groups based on PICC tunnel length. Data collected included baseline characteristics, catheter-related characteristics, PICC-related complications, and patients' pain and comfort levels.

FINDINGS

Patients with 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm PICC tunnel lengths had a longer catheter dwell time and fewer PICC-related complications. No significant differences were found among all groups regarding patients' pain and comfort levels. The results suggest that a tunneled PICC is safe and effective. A tunnel length longer than 4 cm is recommended for tunneled PICC placement.

摘要

背景

关于隧道长度对癌症成人患者经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)置管的影响,证据尚不充分。

目的

主要目的是探讨是否存在最佳的 PICC 隧道长度,以降低 PICC 相关并发症的风险。次要目的是比较不同隧道长度下患者在置管过程中的疼痛和舒适度水平。

方法

将 200 名患者随机分配到基于 PICC 隧道长度的组中。收集的数据包括基线特征、导管相关特征、PICC 相关并发症以及患者的疼痛和舒适度水平。

发现

隧道长度为 4cm、5cm 和 6cm 的患者的导管留置时间更长,PICC 相关并发症更少。所有组在患者的疼痛和舒适度水平方面均无显著差异。结果表明,隧道式 PICC 是安全有效的。建议对隧道式 PICC 置管采用长于 4cm 的隧道长度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验