Huang Wenjie, Lee Melody Kee Tai, Sin Amanda Teo Kai, Nazari Reyan Shah, Chua Syn Yu, Sng Li-Hwei
Central Tuberculosis Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Central Tuberculosis Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Pathology. 2023 Aug;55(5):688-697. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 May 4.
Tuberculosis (TB) is a public health challenge globally, and molecular testing is recommended to expedite diagnosis. Concerns that Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) may be less sensitive when testing paucibacillary samples led to the development of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Ultra). We evaluated the performance of Ultra against Xpert on clinical samples sent to the national reference laboratory in Singapore. In total, 149 samples collected between January 2019 and November 2020 were analysed. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) was isolated from 55 cultures. Using culture as the reference standard, Ultra demonstrated higher sensitivity (96.4% vs 85.5%) and marginally lower specificity (88.3% vs 89.4%) compared to Xpert in the full cohort. When considering only paucibacillary specimens such as extrapulmonary and smear-negative samples, similar results were obtained. Reclassifying Ultra trace results (low levels of MTB are detected but no rifampicin resistant result is detected) as negative in the full cohort led to a decrease in sensitivity by 10.9% and a marginal increase in specificity by 1.1%. In instances of low bacillary load, Ultra also identified rifampicin resistance more accurately than Xpert, when corroborated against other methods such as broth microdilution, line probe assay and whole genome sequencing (WGS). One isolate tested rifampicin-resistant using Xpert and Ultra, but was phenotypically susceptible and WGS demonstrated the presence of the silent mutation Thr444Thr. Ultra is more sensitive than Xpert in the detection of MTBC and rifampicin resistance in our local setting. Nevertheless, the results of molecular testing should still be correlated with phenotypic studies.
结核病(TB)是全球公共卫生面临的一项挑战,推荐采用分子检测以加快诊断。由于担心Xpert MTB/RIF检测法(Xpert)在检测菌量少的样本时可能敏感性较低,因此研发了Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测法(Ultra)。我们在送至新加坡国家参考实验室的临床样本上评估了Ultra相对于Xpert的性能。总共分析了2019年1月至2020年11月期间收集的149份样本。从55份培养物中分离出结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTBC)。以培养作为参考标准,在整个队列中,与Xpert相比,Ultra表现出更高的敏感性(96.4%对85.5%)和略低的特异性(88.3%对89.4%)。仅考虑肺外和涂片阴性等菌量少的标本时,也获得了类似结果。在整个队列中将Ultra的痕量结果(检测到低水平的MTB但未检测到利福平耐药结果)重新分类为阴性,导致敏感性降低10.9%,特异性略有增加1.1%。在菌量低的情况下,与肉汤微量稀释、线性探针检测和全基因组测序(WGS)等其他方法对照时,Ultra在鉴定利福平耐药性方面也比Xpert更准确。一株分离株使用Xpert和Ultra检测为利福平耐药,但表型敏感,WGS显示存在沉默突变Thr444Thr。在我们当地环境中,Ultra在检测MTBC和利福平耐药性方面比Xpert更敏感。尽管如此,分子检测结果仍应与表型研究相关联。