Institute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Research Services, Vienna, Austria.
Parasit Vectors. 2023 Jun 2;16(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05810-4.
BACKGROUND: Hippoboscid flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), also known as louse flies or keds, are obligate blood-sucking ectoparasites of animals, and accidentally of humans. The potential role of hippoboscids as vectors of human and veterinary pathogens is being increasingly investigated, but the presence and distribution of infectious agents in louse flies is still unknown in parts of Europe. Here, we report the use of molecular genetics to detect and characterize vector-borne pathogens in hippoboscid flies infesting domestic and wild animals in Austria. METHODS: Louse flies were collected from naturally infested cattle (n = 25), sheep (n = 3), and red deer (n = 12) across Austria between 2015 and 2019. Individual insects were morphologically identified to species level and subjected to DNA extraction for molecular pathogen screening and barcoding. Genomic DNA from each louse fly was screened for Borrelia spp., Bartonella spp., Trypanosomatida, Anaplasmataceae, Filarioidea and Piroplasmida. Obtained sequences of Trypanosomatida and Bartonella spp. were further characterized by phylogenetic and haplotype networking analyses. RESULTS: A total of 282 hippoboscid flies corresponding to three species were identified: Hippobosca equina (n = 62) collected from cattle, Melophagus ovinus (n = 100) from sheep and Lipoptena cervi (n = 120) from red deer (Cervus elaphus). Molecular screening revealed pathogen DNA in 54.3% of hippoboscids, including infections with single (63.39%), two (30.71%) and up to three (5.90%) distinct pathogens in the same individual. Bartonella DNA was detected in 36.9% of the louse flies. Lipoptena cervi were infected with 10 distinct and previously unreported Bartonella sp. haplotypes, some closely associated with strains of zoonotic potential. DNA of trypanosomatids was identified in 34% of hippoboscids, including the first description of Trypanosoma sp. in H. equina. Anaplasmataceae DNA (Wolbachia spp.) was detected only in M. ovinus (16%), while < 1% of the louse flies were positive for Borrelia spp. and Filarioidea. All hippoboscids were negative for Piroplasmida. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic screening confirmed the presence of several pathogens in hippoboscids infesting domestic and wild ruminants in Austria, including novel pathogen haplotypes of zoonotic potential (e.g. Bartonella spp.) and the first report of Trypanosoma sp. in H. equina, suggesting a potential role of this louse fly as vector of animal trypanosomatids. Experimental transmission studies and expanded monitoring of hippoboscid flies and hippoboscid-associated pathogens are warranted to clarify the competence of these ectoparasites as vectors of infectious agents in a One-Health context.
背景:虱蝇(双翅目:虱蝇科),又称跳蚤或虻,是动物的专性吸血外寄生虫,偶尔也会寄生人类。虱蝇作为人类和兽医病原体的潜在传播媒介的作用正越来越受到关注,但在欧洲部分地区,虱蝇体内的传染性病原体的存在和分布仍不清楚。在这里,我们报告了使用分子遗传学来检测和描述奥地利自然感染的寄生在家畜和野生动物身上的虱蝇携带的病原体。
方法:在 2015 年至 2019 年间,我们从奥地利各地自然感染的牛(n=25)、绵羊(n=3)和马鹿(n=12)身上采集了虱蝇。对每只虱蝇进行形态学鉴定,以确定其物种,并提取 DNA 进行分子病原体筛查和条形码分析。从每只虱蝇的基因组 DNA 中筛选出螺旋体、巴尔通体、锥虫门、立克次体科、线虫和梨形虫。进一步对获得的锥虫门和巴尔通体门的序列进行了系统发育和单倍型网络分析。
结果:共鉴定出三种虱蝇,共 282 只:从牛身上采集的马胃蝇(Hippobosca equina,n=62)、从绵羊身上采集的羊狂蝇(Melophagus ovinus,n=100)和从马鹿身上采集的鹿蝇(Lipoptena cervi,n=120)。分子筛查显示,54.3%的虱蝇携带病原体 DNA,包括在同一个体中同时感染一种(63.39%)、两种(30.71%)和多达三种(5.90%)不同病原体的情况。在 36.9%的虱蝇中检测到巴尔通体 DNA。鹿蝇感染了 10 种不同的、以前未报告的巴尔通体属的单倍型,其中一些与具有动物源性潜在风险的菌株密切相关。在 34%的虱蝇中发现了锥虫门 DNA,包括首次在马胃蝇中发现的锥虫属。仅在羊狂蝇中(16%)检测到立克次体科(沃尔巴克氏体属)的 DNA,而<1%的虱蝇呈螺旋体属和线虫阳性。所有的虱蝇均呈梨形虫阴性。
结论:分子遗传筛查证实,在奥地利寄生在家畜和野生动物身上的虱蝇中存在多种病原体,包括具有动物源性潜在风险的新病原体单倍型(如巴尔通体属)和在马胃蝇中首次报告的锥虫属。这表明这种虱蝇可能是动物锥虫的潜在传播媒介。为了明确这些外寄生虫作为传染性病原体在“同一健康”背景下的传播媒介的能力,需要进行实验性传播研究和对虱蝇和虱蝇相关病原体的监测。
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019-5-10
Acta Trop. 2020-5-21
Parasit Vectors. 2017-10-16
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004-10
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2024-9-25
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023-5
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2025-7-1
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2025-6-6
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2025-5-27
Parasitol Res. 2025-5-31
Parasit Vectors. 2025-4-9
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2022-9-3
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022-4
Microorganisms. 2022-1-26
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021-7
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020-12-25