• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国黄卡计划中与抗凝药物使用相关的胃肠道出血漏报情况。

Under-reporting of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with anticoagulant use using the UK Yellow Card Scheme.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, SK2 7JE, UK.

Pharmacy Department, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, SK2 7JE, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):1014-1018. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01601-0. Epub 2023 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-023-01601-0
PMID:37269441
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Yellow Card Scheme was created in 1964 to oversee new and existing medicines and medical devices, and act as an early warning system for unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Under-reporting within the system is a known issue, estimated to be as high as 94% in a 2006 systematic review. Anticoagulants are often prescribed in the UK to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but can be associated with gastrointestinal bleeding as a common ADR.

AIM

The study aimed to investigate the incidence of suspected DOAC-related GI bleeds at a North-West England hospital and explore the volume of these incidents reported through the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme, over a 5-year period.

METHOD

Hospital coding data was used to identify patient records with GI bleeding and cross-referenced with electronic prescribing records for anticoagulant usage. Additionally, pharmacovigilance reporting activity for the Trust was obtained from the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme.

RESULTS

For the period investigated, the Trust recorded 12,013 GI bleed related emergency admissions. Of these admissions, 1058 patients were taking a DOAC. During the same time period, a total of 6 DOAC-related pharmacovigilance reports were made by the trust.

CONCLUSION

Utilisation of the Yellow Card System for reporting potential ADR is poor, leading to under-reporting of ADRs.

摘要

背景

黄卡计划于 1964 年成立,旨在监督新的和现有的药物和医疗器械,并作为药物不良反应(ADR)的早期预警系统。该系统的低报告率是一个已知问题,在 2006 年的一项系统评价中估计高达 94%。在英国,抗凝剂通常被开给患有心房颤动的患者,以预防中风,但可能会出现胃肠道出血等常见的 ADR。

目的

本研究旨在调查英格兰西北部一家医院疑似 DOAC 相关胃肠道出血的发生率,并探讨在 5 年期间通过 MHRA 黄卡计划报告的这些事件的数量。

方法

医院编码数据用于识别有胃肠道出血的患者记录,并与抗凝剂使用的电子处方记录进行交叉参考。此外,还从 MHRA 黄卡计划获得了信托基金的药物警戒报告活动。

结果

在所调查的期间,该信托机构记录了 12013 例与胃肠道出血相关的紧急入院。在这些住院患者中,有 1058 名患者正在服用 DOAC。在同一时期,该信托总共提交了 6 份与 DOAC 相关的药物警戒报告。

结论

黄卡系统用于报告潜在 ADR 的使用率很低,导致 ADR 报告不足。

相似文献

1
Under-reporting of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with anticoagulant use using the UK Yellow Card Scheme.英国黄卡计划中与抗凝药物使用相关的胃肠道出血漏报情况。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):1014-1018. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01601-0. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
2
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
3
Interpreting adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports as hospital patient safety incidents.将药物不良反应报告解释为医院患者安全事件。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):102-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03671.x.
4
Nonmedical prescriber experiences of training and competence to report adverse drug reactions in the UK.英国非医学开处方者报告药品不良反应的培训及能力经验
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Feb;44(1):78-83. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12756. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
A Comparative Safety Analysis of Medicines Based on the UK Pharmacovigilance and General Practice Prescribing Data in England.基于英国药物警戒和英格兰一般实践处方数据的药品比较安全性分析。
In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):780-800. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12765.
6
Identifying and managing adverse drug reactions: Qualitative analysis of patient reports to the UK yellow card scheme.识别和管理药物不良反应:对英国黄卡计划中患者报告的定性分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;88(7):3434-3446. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15263. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
Adverse drug reaction reporting in the UK: a retrospective observational comparison of yellow card reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals.英国的药物不良反应报告:患者和医疗保健专业人员提交的黄卡报告的回顾性观察比较。
Drug Saf. 2010 Sep 1;33(9):775-88. doi: 10.2165/11536510-000000000-00000.
8
Adverse drug reactions with oral anticoagulants: data from sicilian spontaneous reporting system database.口服抗凝剂的药物不良反应:来自西西里岛自发报告系统数据库的数据。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):1027-1040. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13391. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
9
Relevance of physicochemical properties and functional pharmacology data to predict the clinical safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants.理化性质和功能药理学数据与直接口服抗凝剂临床安全性特征预测的相关性。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Jun;8(3):e00603. doi: 10.1002/prp2.603.
10
The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK.英国 BIO-TRAC 研究:英国临床实践中生物制剂的产品和批次可追溯性以及电子药物不良反应报告的横断面研究。
Drug Saf. 2020 Mar;43(3):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00891-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions for Older People in the Community: Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the ADRe Profile.减少社区老年人药物不良反应:评估药物不良反应概况(ADRe Profile)的有效性和可靠性。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 May 14;2025:9921349. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9921349. eCollection 2025.
2
Triggers for identifying anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.住院患者中识别抗凝相关不良药物事件的触发因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01916-0.
3
Cancer-Therapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Results of the Analysis of the UK Yellow Card Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Reporting.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile apps for quick adverse drug reaction report: A scoping review.移动应用程序快速不良反应报告:范围综述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):19-27. doi: 10.1002/pds.5542. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Adverse drug reactions, multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a prospective analysis of 1 month of medical admissions.药物不良反应、多种合并症和多种药物治疗:对 1 个月医疗入院的前瞻性分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 4;12(7):e055551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055551.
3
Prevalence, contributory factors and severity of medication errors associated with direct-acting oral anticoagulants in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
癌症治疗引起的心脏毒性:英国黄卡药物不良反应(ADR)报告分析结果
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;16(24):4223. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244223.
4
Accuracy in patient-reported adverse drug reactions and their recognition: a mixed-methods study.患者报告的药物不良反应及其识别的准确性:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01669-8. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
直接口服抗凝药物相关的成年患者药物错误的流行率、促成因素和严重程度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr;78(4):623-645. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03212-y. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Severity of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants.直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者的胃肠道出血严重程度。
Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):573.e9-573.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Direct oral anticoagulants and digestive bleeding: therapeutic management and preventive measures.直接口服抗凝剂与消化道出血:治疗管理及预防措施
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;10(6):495-505. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17702092. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
The thalidomide disaster, lessons from the past.沙利度胺灾难:历史教训
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;947:575-86. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-131-8_36.
7
Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy.系统回顾出院编码准确性。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):138-48. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr054. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
8
Adverse drug reaction reporting in the UK: a retrospective observational comparison of yellow card reports submitted by patients and healthcare professionals.英国的药物不良反应报告:患者和医疗保健专业人员提交的黄卡报告的回顾性观察比较。
Drug Saf. 2010 Sep 1;33(9):775-88. doi: 10.2165/11536510-000000000-00000.
9
Knowledge and attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions.关于报告药品不良反应的知识与态度。
Br J Nurs. 2010;19(14):899-904. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2010.19.14.49048.
10
Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.药品不良反应报告不足:一项系统评价
Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385-96. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003.