Department of Orthopedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
Department of Orthopedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
Injury. 2023 Aug;54(8):110713. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.041. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) is an established treatment for posttraumatic elbow stiffness (PTES); however, its efficacy is debatable for some patients. Poor surgical outcomes have been associated with anxiety and depression in other orthopedic conditions, but no studies have examined this association in OEA. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a high preoperative anxiety and depression score is associated with a worse functional outcome in OEA for PTES.
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was carried out in patients undergoing OEA between April 2021 and March 2022. Mental state evaluated by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), subjective elbow function valued by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, objective elbow function valued by Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain score measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and the flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) of the affected elbow were collected before and after surgery in outpatient clinic follow-up at 3 months and 6 months. Patient satisfaction was only recorded 6 months postoperatively. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the preoperative HADS score for analysis: Group A was the nonanxiety-depression group, and Group B was the anxiety-depression group.
A total of 49 patients were included. Both groups improved in DASH, MEPS and ROM at 3 months and at 6 months. The HADS score in Group B decreased significantly at 6 months, showing that the mental state of patients in Group B improved after surgery. Group A had a lower DASH at 3 months and 6 months, larger 6-month ROM and higher satisfaction rate than Group B. Comparing the differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements, Group A improved more in ROM at 6 months. There was no significant difference in other outcome measures between the two groups.
OEA is a safe and effective treatment for PTES, and can achieve good clinical outcomes in the short-term follow-up, regardless of whether the patients suffer from anxiety or depression. Patients with a HADS score ≥11 before OEA, however, have worse outcomes than those with a HADS score <11.
Level II; Retrospective Design; Prognosis Study.
开放式肘松解术(OEA)是治疗创伤后肘僵硬(PTES)的一种既定方法;然而,其疗效在某些患者中存在争议。在其他骨科疾病中,焦虑和抑郁与手术结果不佳有关,但尚无研究探讨 OEA 中这种关联。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定术前较高的焦虑和抑郁评分是否与 OEA 治疗 PTES 的功能结果较差有关。
对 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受 OEA 的患者进行前瞻性数据的回顾性分析。通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评估精神状态,用残疾上肢、肩部和手(DASH)评分评估主观肘部功能,用 Mayo 肘部功能评分(MEPS)评估客观肘部功能,用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛评分和受影响肘部的屈伸活动范围(ROM)。在门诊随访中,分别在术后 3 个月和 6 个月进行收集。所有患者仅在术后 6 个月记录患者满意度。所有患者均根据术前 HADS 评分分为 2 组进行分析:A 组为非焦虑抑郁组,B 组为焦虑抑郁组。
共纳入 49 例患者。两组患者的 DASH、MEPS 和 ROM 在术后 3 个月和 6 个月均有改善。B 组的 HADS 评分在术后 6 个月明显下降,表明 B 组患者术后精神状态改善。A 组在术后 3 个月和 6 个月的 DASH 评分较低,6 个月的 ROM 较大,满意度较高。比较术前和术后测量的差异,A 组在术后 6 个月的 ROM 改善更为明显。两组间其他疗效指标无明显差异。
OEA 是治疗 PTES 的一种安全有效的方法,在短期随访中可获得良好的临床疗效,无论患者是否患有焦虑或抑郁。然而,在接受 OEA 治疗前 HADS 评分≥11 的患者比 HADS 评分<11 的患者结局更差。
Ⅱ级;回顾性设计;预后研究。