Suppr超能文献

街头骚扰经历和旁观者的积极参与:来自瑞士受访者样本的见解。

Experiences of Street Harassment and the Active Engagement of Bystanders: Insights From a Swiss Sample of Respondents.

机构信息

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10640-10663. doi: 10.1177/08862605231175912. Epub 2023 Jun 4.

Abstract

In this article, we analyze data from a survey conducted in the Swiss city of Fribourg to investigate the correlation between bystanders' experiences of street harassment and their likelihood of active engagement and strategies used to stop the harasser or assist and support targets of street harassment. Results reveal that, among bystanders, lifetime experiences of street harassment correlate positively with their ability to recognize street harassment conduct and the likelihood of intervention, support of the survivors, and reporting emergencies, even more significantly when the bystander endured physical abuse. In addition, behavioral differences among bystanders reflect different forms of resistance to the sexist culture that fuels street harassment. In light of these findings, we emphasize the need to integrate the narratives of the bystanders into awareness programs and campaigns, the importance of designing tools and policies to improve feelings of safety and limit street harassment conducts, including forms of benevolent sexism, and support further studies to assess the effectiveness of different intervention strategies in support of victims, including the need to research the use of digital media and its impact as a deterrent to street harassment or in increasing police reporting.

摘要

本文分析了在瑞士弗里堡市进行的一项调查的数据,旨在研究旁观者遭受街头骚扰的经历与其主动干预的可能性以及用于阻止骚扰者或协助和支持街头骚扰受害者的策略之间的相关性。研究结果表明,在旁观者中,一生经历过街头骚扰的人更有可能识别出街头骚扰行为,并更有可能进行干预、支持幸存者以及报告紧急情况,尤其是当旁观者遭受身体虐待时。此外,旁观者之间的行为差异反映了对助长街头骚扰的性别歧视文化的不同形式的抵制。鉴于这些发现,我们强调需要将旁观者的叙述纳入意识提升计划和运动中,重要的是要设计工具和政策来提高安全感并限制街头骚扰行为,包括善意性别歧视的形式,并支持进一步研究,以评估不同干预策略在支持受害者方面的有效性,包括研究使用数字媒体及其作为遏制街头骚扰或增加警察报案的威慑力的效果。

相似文献

1
Experiences of Street Harassment and the Active Engagement of Bystanders: Insights From a Swiss Sample of Respondents.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10640-10663. doi: 10.1177/08862605231175912. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
2
Gender disparity and sexual harassment in vascular surgery practices.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):692-699. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.071. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
The Harasser's Toolbox: Investigating the Role of Mobility in Street Harassment.
Violence Against Women. 2019 May;25(7):767-791. doi: 10.1177/1077801218804100. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Personal and Bystander Harassment Experiences and Outcomes for Hospital Nurses.
J Nurs Adm. 2022 Apr 1;52(4):234-240. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001138.
6
Naming the Unspeakable Harm of Street Harassment: A Survey-Based Examination of Disclosure Practices.
Violence Against Women. 2019 Feb;25(2):223-248. doi: 10.1177/1077801218768709. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence Victimization: Results From an Online Survey of Australian Adults.
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Sep;34(17):3637-3665. doi: 10.1177/0886260516672055. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
Perceptions of sexual harassment: the effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism.
Law Hum Behav. 1997 Feb;21(1):71-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1024818110678.
10
You Too? Female Radiologists' Narratives on Discrimination and Harassment.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Feb;19(2 Pt A):288-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.043. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Harassment: The Dark Triad and Rape Myth acceptance in Indonesia, Singapore, and United Kingdom.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22151-NP22174. doi: 10.1177/08862605211072150. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
From "Ghettoization" to a Field of Its Own: A Comprehensive Review of Street Harassment Research.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jan;24(1):125-138. doi: 10.1177/15248380211021608. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Everyday self-defence: Hollaback narratives, habitus and resisting street harassment.
Br J Sociol. 2019 Dec;70(5):1709-1729. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12699. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
College Students' Perceptions of Barriers to Bystander Intervention.
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):2971-2992. doi: 10.1177/0886260517706764. Epub 2017 May 1.
6
Not All Behind Closed Doors: Examining Bystander Involvement in Intimate Partner Violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Sep;34(18):3915-3935. doi: 10.1177/0886260516673629. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
7
Attentional Bias for Sexual Threat Among Sexual Victimization Survivors: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Apr;18(2):172-184. doi: 10.1177/1524838015602737. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention.
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Feb;29(3):476-96. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505210. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy.
J Adolesc. 2013 Jun;36(3):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验