School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun;228(6):657-674.e91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.027. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Pelvic floor muscle tone, which includes active and passive components, is argued to be increased in many pelvic health conditions, including those involving pain. This study systematically reviewed evidence for increased pelvic floor muscle tone in pelvic health conditions.
Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched up to May 31, 2021. The search strategy included variants of pelvic and/or floor, muscle, and tone using keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms.
Studies were included if they investigated increased tone of the pelvic floor muscle and reported measures of active or mechanical properties of the pelvic floor muscle in humans with any pelvic health condition, including pain, bowel, urogenital, or sexual dysfunctions. Studies of any design were included, except systematic and narrative reviews. Reference lists of studies, reviews, and book chapters were searched for additional studies.
Data were extracted using a standardized form, including measurement tool and outcome measure. Risk of bias was analyzed using a modified ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) tool, and a score was allocated to determine whether the study provided "convincing" interpretation (comparison with condition-free control group, valid measure, no application issues).
In total, 151 studies were included, reporting 8 different tools (electromyography, dynamometry, manometry, digital palpation, defecography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, other). The most common pelvic health condition was pelvic pain (n=16 conditions), followed by bowel and urogenital conditions. Most studies (57%) were cross-sectional. A healthy control group was infrequently included for comparison (27%). Unvalidated methods or methods applied in a manner that precluded convincing interpretation were common (94%). Of the 15 measurement tools that provided convincing evidence, 10 demonstrated greater tone in a pelvic health condition (all pain) compared with controls, and 5 showed no difference.
Despite the large literature, few studies provide convincing evidence for increased tone/overactivity of pelvic floor muscles in pelvic health conditions. Interpretation is hampered by design and measurement issues. Terminology was often inaccurate. Few studies investigate male, transgender, and pediatric groups.
盆腔底肌张力包括主动和被动成分,在许多盆腔健康状况中被认为会增加,包括涉及疼痛的状况。本研究系统地综述了盆腔健康状况中盆腔底肌张力增加的证据。
截至 2021 年 5 月 31 日,电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL 和 Embase)进行了检索。检索策略包括使用关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)术语对盆腔和/或地板、肌肉和张力进行变体。
如果研究调查了盆腔健康状况中盆腔底肌张力增加,并报告了人类盆腔底肌主动或机械特性的测量指标,则纳入研究,包括疼痛、肠、尿生殖或性功能障碍。纳入了任何设计的研究,除了系统和叙述性综述。还搜索了研究、综述和章节的参考文献,以获取其他研究。
使用标准化表格提取数据,包括测量工具和结果测量。使用改良的 ROBINS-I(非随机干预研究的偏倚风险)工具分析偏倚风险,并分配分数以确定研究是否提供“令人信服”的解释(与无疾病对照组进行比较、有效测量、无应用问题)。
共纳入 151 项研究,报道了 8 种不同的工具(肌电图、测力计、测压法、数字触诊、排粪造影、超声、磁共振成像、其他)。最常见的盆腔健康状况是盆腔疼痛(n=16 种疾病),其次是肠和尿生殖状况。大多数研究(57%)为横断面研究。很少有研究(27%)将健康对照组纳入比较。常见的是未验证的方法或应用方式妨碍了令人信服的解释(94%)。在提供令人信服证据的 15 种测量工具中,有 10 种工具显示在盆腔健康状况(均为疼痛)中与对照组相比,张力更大,而 5 种工具则没有差异。
尽管文献很多,但很少有研究提供令人信服的证据表明盆腔健康状况中盆腔底肌张力增加/过度活跃。设计和测量问题妨碍了解释。术语通常不准确。很少有研究调查男性、跨性别者和儿科群体。