Fernandes Delfina, Gomes João P, Albuquerque Pedro B, Matos Marlene
Psychology Research Centre (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, Portugal.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Apr;25(2):1382-1396. doi: 10.1177/15248380231177317. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
Child sexual abuse (CSA) is widely recognized as a global public health problem with negative consequences for victims, their families, and society. The child's testimony is essential to the case outcome, given the frequent absence of physical or biological evidence of the abusive acts. Thus, the child forensic interview plays a decisive role in criminal investigation. The present scoping review aims to identify and describe the judicial procedures for collecting CSA victims' testimony using an evidence-based approach and a structured methodology. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Scoping Review guidelines. Studies were identified through manual reference checking and in four electronic databases: PsycARTICLES, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. In all, 146 studies were identified according to the defined inclusion criteria, that is, empirical studies identifying judicial procedures to collect CSA victims' testimony, published in English or Portuguese. In total, 30 different forensic interview procedures to collect the child victim's testimony were found. The National Institute for Child Health and Human Development investigative interview protocol was the most frequently mentioned. Despite the variety of protocols, it was possible to conclude that they have a similar general structure. This review also identified gaps in interviewing practices with CSA victims. The scoping review corroborates the importance of forensic interviews with CSA victims, stating its implications for criminal investigation, the legal system, and the child's recovery process.
儿童性虐待(CSA)被广泛认为是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,会给受害者及其家庭和社会带来负面影响。鉴于虐待行为的身体或生物学证据常常缺失,儿童的证词对案件结果至关重要。因此,儿童法医面谈在刑事调查中起着决定性作用。本范围综述旨在采用基于证据的方法和结构化方法,识别并描述收集CSA受害者证词的司法程序。该综述遵循系统评价与Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目指南。通过人工查阅参考文献以及在四个电子数据库(PsycARTICLES、PubMed、SCOPUS和科学网)中进行检索来确定相关研究。根据既定的纳入标准,共识别出146项研究,即确定收集CSA受害者证词的司法程序的实证研究,这些研究以英文或葡萄牙文发表。总共发现了30种不同的收集儿童受害者证词的法医面谈程序。美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所的调查面谈协议被提及的频率最高。尽管协议多种多样,但可以得出结论,它们具有相似的总体结构。本综述还发现了与CSA受害者面谈实践中的差距。该范围综述证实了对CSA受害者进行法医面谈的重要性,并阐述了其对刑事调查、法律体系以及儿童康复过程的影响。