• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭穿结构性心脏病经导管介入治疗中的“七月效应”:事实还是神话?

Debunking the July Effect in Transcatheter Interventions in Structural Heart Disease: Truth or Myth?

作者信息

Hirji Sameer A, Singh Supreet, Okoh Alexis K, Malarczyk Alexandra, Percy Edward D, Harloff Morgan T, Kolkailah Ahmed A, Zogg Cheryl K, Loccoh Emefah, Yazdchi Farhang, Russo Mark J, O'Gara Patrick, Shah Pinak, Kaneko Tsuyoshi

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Cardiovascular Research Institute, RWJ Barnabas Health, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Struct Heart. 2022 Mar 17;6(1):100001. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100001. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2022.100001
PMID:37273471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10236779/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The "July effect", the perception of worse outcomes in the first month of training, has been previously demonstrated in critical care medicine and general surgery. However, the July effect in the context of structural heart interventions (i.e., transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR] and MitraClip) remains unknown.

METHODS

All adult patients undergoing TAVR or MitraClip in the 2012-2016 National Inpatient Sample were included. Outcomes were compared by procedure month and academic year quartiles (i.e., between the first academic year quartile [Q1] vs. the fourth quartile [Q4]). Outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals were compared using risk-adjusted logistic difference-in-difference regression.

RESULTS

During the study period, 94,170 TAVR (Q1: 25,250; Q4: 23,170) and 8750 MitraClip (Q1: 2220; Q4: 2150) procedures were performed. In-hospital mortality did not vary as per academic year quartiles for either procedure, even after risk adjustment. These findings persisted in sensitivity analysis by procedure month and newer device era (2015-2016; all > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the unadjusted and adjusted Q1 vs. Q4 in-hospital mortality between teaching and nonteaching hospitals were similar for either procedure. In-hospital mortality also did not vary by procedure month when stratified by hospital teaching status for both procedures. However, postprocedural complication rates appeared to be improving among the TAVR teaching hospitals for stroke, major bleeding, and vascular complications (all < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, nationwide study, the July effect was not evident for structural heart interventions. With increasing interest and growth in transcatheter procedures, early resident and fellow teaching can be achieved with appropriate supervision.

摘要

背景

“七月效应”,即在培训的第一个月中出现更差结果的这种认知,先前已在重症医学和普通外科中得到证实。然而,在结构性心脏介入治疗(即经导管主动脉瓣置换术 [TAVR] 和二尖瓣夹合术)背景下的“七月效应”仍然未知。

方法

纳入2012 - 2016年全国住院患者样本中所有接受TAVR或二尖瓣夹合术的成年患者。通过手术月份和学年四分位数(即第一学年四分位数 [Q1] 与第四四分位数 [Q4] 之间)比较结果。使用风险调整后的逻辑差分回归比较教学医院和非教学医院之间的结果。

结果

在研究期间,共进行了94,170例TAVR手术(Q1:25,250例;Q4:23,170例)和8750例二尖瓣夹合术(Q1:2220例;Q4:2150例)。对于这两种手术中的任何一种,即使在风险调整后,住院死亡率也未随学年四分位数而变化。这些发现在按手术月份和更新设备时代(2015 - 2016年;所有P>0.05)进行的敏感性分析中持续存在。在亚组分析中,教学医院和非教学医院之间,两种手术中未调整和调整后的Q1与Q4住院死亡率相似。按医院教学状态对两种手术进行分层时,住院死亡率也未随手术月份而变化。然而,在TAVR教学医院中,术后中风、大出血和血管并发症的并发症发生率似乎在改善(所有P<0.05)。

结论

在这项大规模的全国性研究中,结构性心脏介入治疗未出现“七月效应”。随着经导管手术的兴趣增加和发展,可以在适当监督下实现早期住院医师和进修医师的教学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/8008953a012d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/bf696e0dad0c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/d24029c8befe/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/d0f5fb787a07/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/8008953a012d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/bf696e0dad0c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/d24029c8befe/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/d0f5fb787a07/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c730/10236779/8008953a012d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Debunking the July Effect in Transcatheter Interventions in Structural Heart Disease: Truth or Myth?揭穿结构性心脏病经导管介入治疗中的“七月效应”:事实还是神话?
Struct Heart. 2022 Mar 17;6(1):100001. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100001. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Debunking the July Effect in Cardiac Surgery: A National Analysis of More Than 470,000 Procedures.破除心脏外科学中的 7 月效应:超过 47 万例手术的全国性分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):929-934. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement at teaching versus nonteaching hospitals.教学医院与非教学医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术的疗效
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3550-3555. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16833. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
4
Hospital teaching status and trascatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in the United States: Analysis of the national inpatient sample.美国医院教学状况与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果:全国住院患者样本分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1200-1205. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27236. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
Association of Hospital Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume With Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair.医院住院患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量与经导管主动脉瓣置换术和经导管二尖瓣修复术后临床结局的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):464-468. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6093.
6
Association of Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Quality With 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.医院外科主动脉瓣置换质量与经导管主动脉瓣置换后 30 天和 1 年死亡率的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;4(1):16-22. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4051.
7
Institutional experience and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Results from an international multicentre registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的机构经验和结果:来自国际多中心注册研究的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;245:222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.079. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
8
Center volume is associated with diminished failure to rescue and improved outcomes following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.中心体积与择期开放腹主动脉瘤修复后失败救援减少和改善结局相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):400-408.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.076. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.非教学医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):954-962. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27968. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Worse outcomes for patients undergoing brain tumor and cerebrovascular procedures following the ACGME resident duty-hour restrictions.美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)对住院医师值班时长进行限制后,接受脑肿瘤和脑血管手术的患者预后更差。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):262-76. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS1314. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Debunking the July Effect in lung transplantation recipients.揭穿肺移植受者中的“七月效应”。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Feb 15;18:376-399. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Operator Experience and Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in the United States.美国经导管二尖瓣修复术的术者经验与结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 17;74(24):2955-2965. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Debunking the July Effect in Cardiac Surgery: A National Analysis of More Than 470,000 Procedures.
破除心脏外科学中的 7 月效应:超过 47 万例手术的全国性分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):929-934. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Procedural Volume and Outcomes for Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的操作量与结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2541-2550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1901109. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (NIS).《手术数据集实用指南:医疗保健成本与利用项目国家住院样本(NIS)》
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 1;153(6):586-587. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0542.
8
Identifying Increased Risk of Readmission and In-hospital Mortality Using Hospital Administrative Data: The AHRQ Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.利用医院管理数据识别再入院和住院死亡率增加的风险:AHRQ埃利克斯豪泽共病指数
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):698-705. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000735.
9
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
10
Mortality among high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to U.S. teaching-intensive hospitals in July: a retrospective observational study.美国教学医院收治的高危急性心肌梗死患者的死亡率:一项回顾性观察研究。
Circulation. 2013 Dec 24;128(25):2754-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004074. Epub 2013 Oct 23.