• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际前列腺症状评分-改良版(IPSS-M)在实际临床实践中的影响。

Impact of IPSS-M implementation in real-life clinical practice.

作者信息

Zamanillo Irene, Poza Maria, Ayala Rosa, Rapado Inmaculada, Martinez-Lopez Joaquín, Cedena Maria Teresa

机构信息

Hematology Department and Research Institute (imas12), University Hospital 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1199023. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1199023. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1199023
PMID:37274292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10233005/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The IPSS-M is a recently published score for risk stratification in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), based on clinical and molecular data. We aimed to evaluate its relevance on treatment choice in a real-life setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data from 166 MDS patients. We calculated IPSS-R and IPSS-M scores and compared Overall Survival (OS) and Leukemia Free Survival (LFS). We also analyzed which patients would have been affected by the re-stratification in terms of clinical management.

RESULTS

We found that 86.1% of the patients had at least one genetic alteration. The most frequent mutated genes were (25.9%), (16.8%) and (14.4%). IPSS-M re-stratified 48.2% of the patients, of which 16.9% were downgraded and 31.3% were upgraded. IPSS-M improved outcome prediction, with a Harrell's c-index of 0.680 vs 0.626 for OS and 0.801 vs 0.757 for LFS. In 22.2% of the cohort, the reclassification of the IPSS-M could potentially affect clinical management; 17.4% of the patients would be eligible for treatment intensification and 4.8% for treatment reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

IPSS-M implementation in clinical practice could imply different treatment approaches in a significant number of patients. Our work validates IPSS-M in an external cohort and confirms its applicability in a real-life setting.

摘要

目的

国际预后评分系统-分子版(IPSS-M)是最近发布的用于骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)风险分层的评分系统,基于临床和分子数据。我们旨在评估其在实际临床环境中对治疗选择的相关性。

方法

我们回顾性收集了166例MDS患者的临床、细胞遗传学和分子数据。我们计算了国际预后评分系统修订版(IPSS-R)和国际预后评分系统-分子版(IPSS-M)得分,并比较了总生存期(OS)和无白血病生存期(LFS)。我们还分析了哪些患者在临床管理方面会受到重新分层的影响。

结果

我们发现86.1%的患者至少有一处基因改变。最常见的突变基因是(此处原文缺失具体基因名称)(25.9%)、(此处原文缺失具体基因名称)(16.8%)和(此处原文缺失具体基因名称)(14.4%)。IPSS-M对48.2%的患者进行了重新分层,其中16.9%的患者分层降低,31.3%的患者分层升高。IPSS-M改善了预后预测,总生存期的Harrell c指数为0.680,而之前为0.626;无白血病生存期的Harrell c指数为0.801,而之前为0.757。在22.2%的队列中,IPSS-M的重新分类可能会影响临床管理;17.4%的患者符合强化治疗标准,4.8%的患者符合减少治疗标准。

结论

在临床实践中实施IPSS-M可能意味着在相当数量的患者中采用不同的治疗方法。我们的研究在外部队列中验证了IPSS-M,并证实了其在实际临床环境中的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/4c2ddc67763a/fonc-13-1199023-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/c9e9e0b0ba7d/fonc-13-1199023-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/aa663008ad6d/fonc-13-1199023-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/58b7805744e8/fonc-13-1199023-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/8e6b6e81dc31/fonc-13-1199023-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/4c2ddc67763a/fonc-13-1199023-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/c9e9e0b0ba7d/fonc-13-1199023-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/aa663008ad6d/fonc-13-1199023-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/58b7805744e8/fonc-13-1199023-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/8e6b6e81dc31/fonc-13-1199023-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b785/10233005/4c2ddc67763a/fonc-13-1199023-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of IPSS-M implementation in real-life clinical practice.国际前列腺症状评分-改良版(IPSS-M)在实际临床实践中的影响。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1199023. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1199023. eCollection 2023.
2
Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的分子国际预后评分系统
NEJM Evid. 2022 Jul;1(7):EVIDoa2200008. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200008. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
3
Evaluation of new IPSS-Molecular model and comparison of different prognostic systems in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.骨髓增生异常综合征患者新IPSS分子模型的评估及不同预后系统的比较
Blood Sci. 2023 Jul 5;5(3):187-195. doi: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000166. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Assessment and validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.评估和验证骨髓增生异常综合征的分子国际预后评分系统。
Leukemia. 2023 Jul;37(7):1530-1539. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01910-3. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Assessing the Relevance of Non-molecular Prognostic Systems for Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.评估在下一代测序时代非分子预后系统在骨髓增生异常综合征中的相关性。
Ann Lab Med. 2025 Jan 1;45(1):44-52. doi: 10.3343/alm.2024.0089. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
A retrospective validation of the IPSS-M molecular score in primary and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).IPSS-M分子评分在原发性及治疗相关骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)中的回顾性验证
Leuk Lymphoma. 2023 Oct;64(10):1689-1694. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2232491. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
Decreased transthyretin predicts a poor prognosis in primary myelodysplastic syndrome.转甲状腺素蛋白降低预示原发性骨髓增生异常综合征预后不良。
Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 7;10:1125768. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1125768. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms.比较分子国际预后评分系统(M-IPSS)和修订后的国际预后评分系统(R-IPSS)在泰国骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的应用。
Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):1301-1304. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2156682.
9
IPSS-R in 555 Taiwanese patients with primary MDS: Integration of monosomal karyotype can better risk-stratify the patients.555 例台湾地区原发性骨髓增生异常综合征患者的 IPSS-R:单体核型的整合可以更好地对患者进行危险分层。
Am J Hematol. 2014 Sep;89(9):E142-9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23765. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database.修订后的国际预后评分系统(IPSS)比 IPSS 和世界卫生组织预后评分系统更能显著预测骨髓增生异常综合征的生存和白血病演变:意大利罗马米洛迪斯plasia 区域数据库的验证。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2671-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.0764. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Relevance of Non-molecular Prognostic Systems for Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.评估在下一代测序时代非分子预后系统在骨髓增生异常综合征中的相关性。
Ann Lab Med. 2025 Jan 1;45(1):44-52. doi: 10.3343/alm.2024.0089. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的分子国际预后评分系统
NEJM Evid. 2022 Jul;1(7):EVIDoa2200008. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200008. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
2
Real-World Validation of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes.分子国际预后评分系统在骨髓增生异常综合征中的真实世界验证。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 20;41(15):2827-2842. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01784. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Risk prediction in MDS: independent validation of the IPSS-M-ready for routine?
骨髓增生异常综合征的风险预测:IPSS-M的独立验证——是否适合常规应用?
Leukemia. 2023 Apr;37(4):938-941. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01831-1. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms.比较分子国际预后评分系统(M-IPSS)和修订后的国际预后评分系统(R-IPSS)在泰国骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的应用。
Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):1301-1304. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2156682.
5
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms.世界卫生组织血液淋巴肿瘤分类第五版:髓系和组织细胞/树突状肿瘤。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1703-1719. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Somatic mutations predict prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome patients with normal karyotypes.体细胞突变可预测核型正常的骨髓增生异常综合征患者的预后。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Jul 26;6(1):274. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00606-3.
7
Clinical significance of cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities in 634 Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.634 例中国骨髓增生异常综合征患者细胞遗传学和分子遗传学异常的临床意义。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1759-1771. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3786. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
IDH1 Mutation Is an Independent Inferior Prognostic Indicator for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes.异柠檬酸脱氢酶1(IDH1)突变是骨髓增生异常综合征患者独立的不良预后指标。
Acta Haematol. 2017;138(3):143-151. doi: 10.1159/000479546. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Incorporation of molecular data into the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System in treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.将分子数据纳入治疗骨髓增生异常综合征患者的修订国际预后评分系统。
Leukemia. 2016 Nov;30(11):2214-2220. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.138. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the prospective European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry.修订后的国际预后评分系统(IPSS-R)在低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的验证:来自欧洲白血病网骨髓增生异常综合征(EUMDS)前瞻性注册研究的报告
Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(3):372-83. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13450. Epub 2015 Apr 24.