Suppr超能文献

《杜兰德适应性精神病态特质问卷》的不一致反应量表

An Inconsistency Responding Scale for the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire.

作者信息

Durand Guillaume

机构信息

School of Counselling, Psychotherapy and Spirituality, Faculty of Human Sciences. Saint Paul University, 223 Main Street, K1S 1C4. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. School of Counselling, Psychotherapy and Spirituality Faculty of Human Sciences Saint Paul University OttawaOntario Canada.

出版信息

Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2023 Mar 3;15(2):44-50. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5524. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.

Abstract

Careless and inconsistent responding is a common issue with self- reported instruments, observed in approximately 10% of respondents. The purpose of this study was to develop an Inconsistency Responding Scale (IRS) for the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Question- naire (DAPTQ). First, a derivation sample (N = 525) was used to develop the IRS-DAPTQ, a scale generating a total score from the absolute difference of 12 pairs of items with high intra-correlation. Second, the validity of the IRS-DAPTQ was assessed using human (N = 943) and randomly generated (N = 1000) data. The IRS-DAPTQ successfully differentiated human data from randomly generated data. The IRS-DAPTQ scores showed a negative association with conscientiousness and had higher specificity for a sample of the gen- eral population recruited online than for a sample of undergraduate students. These findings support the usefulness of the IRS-DAPTQ for identifying individuals displaying an inconsistent responding style.

摘要

粗心和不一致的回答是自我报告工具中常见的问题,约10%的受访者存在此情况。本研究的目的是为杜兰德适应性精神病态特质问卷(DAPTQ)开发一个不一致回答量表(IRS)。首先,使用一个推导样本(N = 525)来开发IRS-DAPTQ,该量表通过12对具有高内部相关性的项目的绝对差值生成总分。其次,使用人类数据(N = 943)和随机生成的数据(N = 1000)评估IRS-DAPTQ的有效性。IRS-DAPTQ成功地区分了人类数据和随机生成的数据。IRS-DAPTQ得分与尽责性呈负相关,并且对于在线招募的普通人群样本比本科生样本具有更高的特异性。这些发现支持了IRS-DAPTQ在识别表现出不一致回答风格的个体方面的有用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a1f/10233952/c1849d2aba1a/2011-2084-ijpr-15-02-44-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
An Inconsistency Responding Scale for the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire.
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2023 Mar 3;15(2):44-50. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5524. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
2
Incremental Validity of the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire Above Self-Report Psychopathy Measures in Community Samples.
J Pers Assess. 2019 Sep-Oct;101(5):493-502. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1464456. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
The Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire: Development and Validation.
J Pers Assess. 2019 Mar-Apr;101(2):140-149. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1372443. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Big Five Inventory-2.
J Pers Assess. 2025 May-Jun;107(3):384-391. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
7
Identifying Careless Responding With the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised Validity Scales.
Assessment. 2018 Jan;25(1):31-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191116641507. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Aug;29(8):990-1000. doi: 10.1037/pas0000395. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
9
Detecting Inconsistent Responding on the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Short Form.
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):465-478. doi: 10.1177/1073191117738048. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Construction and preliminary validation of an inconsistent responding scale for the HEXACO-100.
Psychol Assess. 2023 Mar;35(3):280-285. doi: 10.1037/pas0001203. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Fearless Dominance/Boldness Is Not Strongly Related to Externalizing Behaviors: An Item Response-Based Analysis.
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):413-428. doi: 10.1177/1073191120907959. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Heterogeneity of adaptive features among psychopathy variants.
Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):63-68. doi: 10.1037/per0000366. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Incremental Validity of the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire Above Self-Report Psychopathy Measures in Community Samples.
J Pers Assess. 2019 Sep-Oct;101(5):493-502. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1464456. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Response Inconsistency Scale.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):398-405. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
The Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire: Development and Validation.
J Pers Assess. 2019 Mar-Apr;101(2):140-149. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1372443. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Aug;29(8):990-1000. doi: 10.1037/pas0000395. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):218-29. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000085. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data.
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):828-45. doi: 10.1037/a0038510. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
9
10
An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory's nomological network: a meta-analytic review.
Personal Disord. 2012 Jul;3(3):305-26. doi: 10.1037/a0024567. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验