• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性下消化道出血出院后复发的长期风险:一项大型全国队列研究。

Long-term Risks of Recurrence After Hospital Discharge for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Large Nationwide Cohort Study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;21(13):3258-3269.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.021
PMID:37276989
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Currently, large, nationwide, long-term follow-up data on acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) are scarce. We investigated long-term risks of recurrence after hospital discharge for ALGIB using a large multicenter dataset.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 5048 patients who were urgently hospitalized for ALGIB at 49 hospitals across Japan (CODE BLUE-J study). Risk factors for the long-term recurrence of ALGIB were analyzed by using competing risk analysis, treating death without rebleeding as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Rebleeding occurred in 1304 patients (25.8%) during a mean follow-up period of 31 months. The cumulative incidences of rebleeding at 1 and 5 years were 15.1% and 25.1%, respectively. The mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with out-of-hospital rebleeding episodes than in those without (hazard ratio, 1.42). Of the 30 factors, multivariate analysis showed that shock index ≥1 (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.25), blood transfusion (SHR, 1.26), in-hospital rebleeding (SHR, 1.26), colonic diverticular bleeding (SHR, 2.38), and thienopyridine use (SHR, 1.24) were significantly associated with increased rebleeding risk. Multivariate analysis of colonic diverticular bleeding patients showed that blood transfusion (SHR, 1.20), in-hospital rebleeding (SHR, 1.30), and thienopyridine use (SHR, 1.32) were significantly associated with increased rebleeding risk, whereas endoscopic hemostasis (SHR, 0.83) significantly decreased the risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These large, nationwide follow-up data highlighted the importance of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment during hospitalization and the assessment of the need for ongoing thienopyridine use to reduce the risk of out-of-hospital rebleeding. This information also aids in the identification of patients at high risk of rebleeding.

摘要

背景与目的

目前,关于急性下消化道出血(ALGIB)的大规模、全国性、长期随访数据仍然匮乏。本研究使用大型多中心数据集,旨在探讨 ALGIB 患者出院后长期复发的风险。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在日本 49 家医院紧急住院治疗的 5048 例 ALGIB 患者(CODE BLUE-J 研究)。使用竞争风险分析方法分析了 ALGIB 长期复发的危险因素,将无再出血死亡视为竞争风险。

结果

在平均 31 个月的随访期间,共有 1304 例患者(25.8%)发生再出血。1 年和 5 年的累积再出血发生率分别为 15.1%和 25.1%。与无院外再出血患者相比,有院外再出血患者的死亡风险显著更高(风险比,1.42)。在 30 个因素中,多变量分析显示,休克指数≥1(亚分布风险比[SHR],1.25)、输血(SHR,1.26)、院内再出血(SHR,1.26)、结肠憩室出血(SHR,2.38)和噻吩吡啶类药物的使用(SHR,1.24)与再出血风险增加显著相关。对结肠憩室出血患者的多变量分析显示,输血(SHR,1.20)、院内再出血(SHR,1.30)和噻吩吡啶类药物的使用(SHR,1.32)与再出血风险增加显著相关,而内镜止血(SHR,0.83)显著降低了风险。

结论

这些大规模的全国性随访数据强调了住院期间进行内镜诊断和治疗的重要性,以及评估持续使用噻吩吡啶类药物减少院外再出血风险的必要性。这些信息还有助于识别再出血风险较高的患者。

相似文献

1
Long-term Risks of Recurrence After Hospital Discharge for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Large Nationwide Cohort Study.急性下消化道出血出院后复发的长期风险:一项大型全国队列研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;21(13):3258-3269.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
2
Outcomes and recurrent bleeding risks of detachable snare and band ligation for colonic diverticular bleeding: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.可解脱圈套和带结扎治疗结肠憩室出血的结局和再出血风险:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jul;98(1):59-72.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
3
Characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors of surgery for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: nationwide cohort study of 10,342 hematochezia cases.急性下消化道出血手术的特点、结局和危险因素:全国范围内 10342 例血便病例的队列研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan;59(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02057-9. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
High risk stigmata and treatment strategy for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide study in Japan.日本全国研究:急性下消化道出血的高危特征及治疗策略。
Endoscopy. 2024 Apr;56(4):291-301. doi: 10.1055/a-2232-9630. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Endoscopic direct clipping versus indirect clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A large multicenter cohort study.内镜下直接夹闭与间接夹闭治疗结肠憩室出血:一项大型多中心队列研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Feb;10(1):93-103. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12197. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
6
Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A population-based five-year follow-up study.急性下消化道出血:一项基于人群的五年随访研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Dec;7(10):1330-1336. doi: 10.1177/2050640619863517. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Prevalence and risk factors of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in Crohn disease.克罗恩病中急性下消化道出血的患病率及危险因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(19):e804. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000804.
8
A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage and rebleeding rate between early and elective colonoscopy in outpatient-onset acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项多中心随机对照试验,比较门诊起病的急性下消化道出血患者早期结肠镜检查与择期结肠镜检查在近期出血痕迹识别率和再出血率方面的差异:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Apr 3;19(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2558-y.
9
Recent Trends in Treatment for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding in Japan.日本结直肠憩室出血治疗的最新趋势。
Digestion. 2020;101(1):12-17. doi: 10.1159/000504089. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Early feeding reduces length of hospital stay in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A large multicentre cohort study.早期喂养可减少急性下消化道出血患者的住院时间:一项大型多中心队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2206-2216. doi: 10.1111/codi.16751. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic treatment modalities for colonic diverticular bleeding: A systematic review with direct and network meta-analyses.结肠憩室出血的内镜治疗方式:一项直接和网状荟萃分析的系统评价
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Aug 16;17(8):109313. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.109313.
2
Updated evidence on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment for colonic diverticular bleeding.关于结肠憩室出血的流行病学、诊断和治疗的最新证据。
DEN Open. 2025 May 6;6(1):e70122. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70122. eCollection 2026 Apr.
3
Look inside the management of colonic diverticular rebleeding: a systematic review.
结肠憩室再出血的管理探讨:一项系统评价
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 25;18:17562848251321695. doi: 10.1177/17562848251321695. eCollection 2025.
4
Efficacy and safety of conservative treatment for colonic diverticular bleeding: Prospective study.结肠憩室出血保守治疗的疗效与安全性:前瞻性研究
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jan 29;13:a25097426. doi: 10.1055/a-2509-7426. eCollection 2025.
5
Association of blood group O with a recurrent risk for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding from a multicenter cohort study.血型 O 与多中心队列研究中急性下消化道出血再发风险的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13983. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64476-9.
6
Do not confuse movement for progress: The saga of urgent colonoscopies in lower gastro-intestinal bleeding.不要将行动误以为是进步:下消化道出血紧急结肠镜检查的故事。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;30(2):73-75. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_49_24. Epub 2024 Feb 15.