Rosendal Kristin, Kettunen Anne, Olesen Ingrid
The Fridtjof Nansen Institute (FNI), Lysaker, Norway.
Nofima AS, Ås, Norway.
J Fish Biol. 2025 Jan;106(1):20-32. doi: 10.1111/jfb.15470. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
Sea lice represent a persistent and growing problem, challenging the resilience and growth of the salmon aquaculture industry. In this Norwegian case study, we studied and discuss how the absence of policy instruments directed at stimulating breeding for lice resistance (LR) might be explained. We found well-documented opportunities for selection progress for LR. Hence, breeding on LR appears with an untapped potential. We discuss how market-based, legal, institutional and interest-based factors can explain the absence of policy instruments stimulating LR breeding. Methodologically, we obtained data from document and literature studies and interviews with key players (salmon breeders, farmers, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and governmental bodies in Norway). First, LR is a polygenic trait, which makes it poorly suited for patenting. Furthermore, if only a small proportion of fish farmers choose seeds with higher LR, other operators can easily take on the free-rider role because they will not suffer from reduced gain in growth performance as a result of a much stronger emphasis on LR in the breeding goal. The market is thus not expected to stimulate stronger selection for LR in Norwegian salmon breeding. Second, neither genetic engineering (e.g., gene editing), still struggling with consumer acceptance, nor the uncertainty associated with possible changes in the Norwegian Gene Technology Act stimulate investment in LR via, for example, CRISPR technology. Thirdly, public policy instruments in their entirety have targeted other types of innovations against salmon lice, and none have so far been used to stimulate breeding companies to emphasize LR more strongly in their breeding programmes. From a political point of view, it seems that breeding has been left to the market and the private sector. However, neither the NGOs nor the public seem to be aware of, or pay significant attention to, the breeding potential to improve LR and fish welfare. Fragmented management of the aquaculture sector can camouflage the close ties between political and business interests. The industry is hesitant to invest significantly in long-term breeding targets such as significantly higher genetic LR. This may strengthen the assumption that strong economic interests will reduce the role of science in knowledge-based management. As farmed salmon are increasingly being exposed to stressful delousing treatments, mortality and associated welfare problems have increased significantly. For instance, large fish die more often from cardiomyopathy syndrome (CMS), resulting in growing demand for CMS-resistant salmon. This gives rise to a paradoxical situation: increasing treatments with high mortality and fish welfare issues in farmed salmon, while the lice threat to wild salmon persists.
海虱是一个持续且日益严重的问题,对鲑鱼养殖业的恢复力和发展构成挑战。在这个挪威的案例研究中,我们研究并探讨了如何解释缺乏旨在刺激抗虱(LR)育种的政策工具这一现象。我们发现有充分记录的实现LR选择进展的机会。因此,LR育种似乎具有未被挖掘的潜力。我们讨论了基于市场、法律、制度和利益的因素如何能够解释缺乏刺激LR育种的政策工具的原因。在方法上,我们从文件和文献研究以及对关键参与者(挪威的鲑鱼育种者、养殖者、非政府组织(NGO)和政府机构)的访谈中获取了数据。首先,LR是一个多基因性状,这使其不太适合申请专利。此外,如果只有一小部分养鱼户选择具有更高LR的鱼苗,其他经营者很容易扮演搭便车的角色,因为他们不会因育种目标中更加强调LR而在生长性能上遭受收益减少的情况。因此,预计市场不会刺激挪威鲑鱼育种中对LR进行更强的选择。其次,无论是仍在努力获得消费者认可的基因工程(如基因编辑),还是与挪威《基因技术法》可能的变化相关的不确定性,都不会刺激通过例如CRISPR技术对LR进行投资。第三,总体而言,公共政策工具针对的是对抗鲑鱼虱的其他类型创新,到目前为止,没有任何工具被用于刺激育种公司在其育种计划中更加强调LR。从政治角度来看,似乎育种被留给了市场和私营部门。然而,非政府组织和公众似乎都没有意识到或高度关注提高LR和鱼类福利的育种潜力。水产养殖部门的分散管理可能掩盖了政治和商业利益之间的紧密联系。该行业对于在诸如显著提高基因LR等长期育种目标上进行大量投资持犹豫态度。这可能强化了一种假设,即强大的经济利益会削弱科学在基于知识的管理中的作用。随着养殖鲑鱼越来越多地接受压力较大的除虱处理,死亡率和相关的福利问题显著增加。例如,大鱼更常死于心肌病综合征(CMS),导致对耐CMS鲑鱼的需求不断增加。这就产生了一种自相矛盾的情况:养殖鲑鱼的处理次数增加,死亡率和鱼类福利问题增多,而虱子对野生鲑鱼的威胁依然存在。