Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA. 2023 Jun 6;329(21):1840-1847. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7271.
US hospitals report data on many health care quality metrics to government and independent health care rating organizations, but the annual cost to acute care hospitals of measuring and reporting quality metric data, independent of resources spent on quality interventions, is not well known.
To evaluate externally reported inpatient quality metrics for adult patients and estimate the cost of data collection and reporting, independent of quality-improvement efforts.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective time-driven activity-based costing study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland) with hospital personnel involved in quality metric reporting processes interviewed between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, about quality reporting activities in the 2018 calendar year.
Outcomes included the number of metrics, annual person-hours per metric type, and annual personnel cost per metric type.
A total of 162 unique metrics were identified, of which 96 (59.3%) were claims-based, 107 (66.0%) were outcome metrics, and 101 (62.3%) were related to patient safety. Preparing and reporting data for these metrics required an estimated 108 478 person-hours, with an estimated personnel cost of $5 038 218.28 (2022 USD) plus an additional $602 730.66 in vendor fees. Claims-based (96 metrics; $37 553.58 per metric per year) and chart-abstracted (26 metrics; $33 871.30 per metric per year) metrics used the most resources per metric, while electronic metrics consumed far less (4 metrics; $1901.58 per metric per year).
Significant resources are expended exclusively for quality reporting, and some methods of quality assessment are far more expensive than others. Claims-based metrics were unexpectedly found to be the most resource intensive of all metric types. Policy makers should consider reducing the number of metrics and shifting to electronic metrics, when possible, to optimize resources spent in the overall pursuit of higher quality.
美国医院向政府和独立的医疗保健评级机构报告许多医疗保健质量指标数据,但衡量和报告质量指标数据的急性护理医院的年度成本,而不考虑用于质量改进的资源,这一点尚不清楚。
评估成人患者的住院质量指标,并估算数据收集和报告的成本,而不考虑质量改进工作。
设计、地点和参与者:马里兰州巴尔的摩市约翰霍普金斯医院的回顾性时间驱动作业成本研究,医院参与质量指标报告流程的人员于 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日接受采访,了解 2018 日历年的质量报告活动。
结果包括指标数量、每种指标类型的年度人均工时和每种指标类型的年度人员成本。
共确定了 162 个独特的指标,其中 96 个(59.3%)是基于索赔的,107 个(66.0%)是结果指标,101 个(62.3%)与患者安全相关。为这些指标准备和报告数据需要估计 108478 个人工时,估计人员成本为 5038218.28 美元(2022 年美元),外加 602730.66 美元的额外供应商费用。基于索赔的(96 个指标;每年每个指标 37553.58 美元)和图表摘要的(26 个指标;每年每个指标 33871.30 美元)指标每个指标的资源使用最多,而电子指标的消耗要少得多(4 个指标;每年每个指标 1901.58 美元)。
专门为质量报告投入了大量资源,并且某些质量评估方法比其他方法昂贵得多。基于索赔的指标是所有指标类型中最耗费资源的,这令人意外。政策制定者应考虑减少指标数量,并尽可能转向电子指标,以优化在追求更高质量的总体过程中所花费的资源。