• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于索赔的绩效反馈报告的用途与局限性:来自综合初级保健倡议的经验教训

Uses and Limitations of Claims-based Performance Feedback Reports: Lessons From the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.

作者信息

Gerteis Margaret, Peikes Deborah, Ghosh Arkadipta, Timmins Lori, OʼMalley Ann S, Barna Michael, Taylor Erin F, Day Timothy J, Swankoski Kaylyn, Payne Perry W, Brown Randall

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2018 Jul/Aug;40(4):187-193. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000099.

DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000099
PMID:28837449
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Performance feedback is central to data-driven models of quality improvement, but the use of claims-based data for feedback has received little attention.

PURPOSE

To examine the challenges, uses, and limitations of quarterly Medicare claims-based performance feedback reports generated for practices participating in the Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative from 2012 to 2015.

METHODS

Mixed methods study of nearly 500 CPC practices in seven regions, combining pilot testing; systematic monitoring; surveys; in-depth interviews; user feedback; and input from data feedback team.

RESULTS

Designing reports required addressing issues about timing, data completeness and reliability, variations in patient risk across practices, and use of benchmarks and metrics understandable to users. Practices' ability to use reports constructively depended on their experience, analytic resources, expectations, and perceptions about the role of primary care in improving reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Generating claims-based feedback reports that support practices' quality improvement efforts requires a significant investment of analytic expertise, time, resources, continuous improvement, and technical assistance.

IMPLICATIONS

Claims-based performance feedback can provide insight into patterns of patients' care across provider settings and opportunities for improvement, but practices need data from other sources to manage patients in real time or assess the short-term effects of specific changes in care delivery.

摘要

背景

绩效反馈是数据驱动的质量改进模型的核心,但基于索赔数据进行反馈的应用很少受到关注。

目的

探讨2012年至2015年为参与综合初级保健(CPC)倡议的医疗机构生成的季度医疗保险基于索赔的绩效反馈报告的挑战、用途和局限性。

方法

对七个地区近500家CPC医疗机构进行混合方法研究,结合试点测试、系统监测、调查、深入访谈、用户反馈以及数据反馈团队的意见。

结果

设计报告需要解决有关时间安排、数据完整性和可靠性、各医疗机构患者风险差异以及使用用户可理解的基准和指标等问题。医疗机构建设性地使用报告的能力取决于其经验、分析资源、期望以及对初级保健在改善报告结果中作用的认知。

结论

生成支持医疗机构质量改进工作的基于索赔的反馈报告需要投入大量的分析专业知识、时间、资源、持续改进以及技术援助。

启示

基于索赔的绩效反馈可以洞察不同医疗机构的患者护理模式以及改进机会,但医疗机构需要来自其他来源的数据来实时管理患者或评估护理提供方面特定变化的短期影响。

相似文献

1
Uses and Limitations of Claims-based Performance Feedback Reports: Lessons From the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.基于索赔的绩效反馈报告的用途与局限性:来自综合初级保健倡议的经验教训
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Jul/Aug;40(4):187-193. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000099.
2
Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.综合初级保健倡议的两年成本和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414953. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Health care provider quality improvement organization Medicare data-sharing: a diabetes quality improvement initiative.医疗服务提供者质量改进组织医疗保险数据共享:一项糖尿病质量改进倡议。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:22-5.
4
Strengthening Multipayer Collaboration: Lessons From the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.加强多方合作:综合初级保健倡议的经验教训
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):602-633. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12280.
5
Aggregating Claims Data Across Payers: Approaches, Challenges, and Lessons Learned From the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.聚合支付方的理赔数据:全面初级保健倡议的方法、挑战和经验教训。
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.1177/1062860619843350. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.初级保健实践在 EvidenceNOW 西南倡议中报告电子临床质量指标以改善心脏健康的能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569.
7
The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Effects On Spending, Quality, Patients, And Physicians.《综合初级保健倡议:对支出、质量、患者和医生的影响》。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):890-899. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1678. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Use of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small to Medium-Size US Primary Care Practices.美国中小型初级保健实践中质量改进策略的使用。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S35-S43. doi: 10.1370/afm.2172.
9
Impact of Medical Homes on Expenditures and Utilization for Beneficiaries With Behavioral Health Conditions.医疗之家对有行为健康问题的受益人的支出和利用的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Aug 1;69(8):871-878. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700433. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Changes in Utilization and Expenditures for Medicare Beneficiaries in Patient-centered Medical Homes: Findings From the Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration.以患者为中心的医疗之家中医疗保险受益人的利用和支出的变化:多付款人高级初级保健实践示范的研究结果。
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):775-783. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000966.

引用本文的文献

1
Do medical specialists accept claims-based Audit and Feedback for quality improvement? A focus group study.医学专家是否接受基于索赔的审核和反馈来进行质量改进?一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 8;14(4):e081063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081063.
2
Creating a culture of quality: our experience with providing feedback to frontline hospitalists.营造质量文化:我们为一线住院医师提供反馈的经验。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001141.
3
Association between GP participation in a primary care group and monitoring of biomedical and lifestyle target indicators in people with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study (ELZHA cohort-1).
中文译文:2 型糖尿病患者中全科医生参与初级保健小组与监测生物医学和生活方式目标指标之间的关联:一项队列研究(ELZHA 队列-1)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 27;10(4):e033085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033085.
4
Measurement without management: qualitative evaluation of a voluntary audit & feedback intervention for primary care teams.无管理的测量:对初级保健团队的自愿审核和反馈干预的定性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4226-7.